Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:3 (2021) ► pp.349–367

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Bricks as arguments

Representing polysemy in Amsterdam School architectural design

 | University of Pittsburgh
Published online: 14 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20012.con
Abstract
This study applies Leo . 2019. “Depicting Visual Arguments: An “ART” Approach,” in Informal Logic: A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument, ed. by Federico Puppo, 332–374. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar ART approach and KC (Key Component) table method to social housing buildings designed by a significant Dutch architectural movement during the early twentieth century – the so-called Amsterdam School. Unlike members of other contemporary architectural movements, architects of the Amsterdam School seldom wrote about their theories or beliefs, leaving very little evidence about their feelings and attitudes apart from the architectural forms they constructed. The expressive designs of Amsterdam School social housing buildings Het Schip and De Dageraad present promising opportunities for theoretical reflection on architecture as a form of embodied visual and multimodal argumentation (‘bricks as arguments’), however, other theoretical tools may be necessary to supplement the ART approach in order to fashion a critical method capable of apprehending the full scope of argumentation in the complex and rich Dutch polylogue.
Article outline
  • Multimodal and visual argumentation
  • Social housing in the Netherlands
  • Bricks as arguments
    • The ‘Spire’ at Het Schip
    • Decorative brickwork at Het Schip and De Dageraad
    • The ‘Verboden’ sign at Het Schip
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • Works cited
References (47)
Works cited
Aakhus, Mark and Sally Jackson. 2005. Technology, Interaction, and Design. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, eds. Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 411–436. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amsterdam School Museum Het Schip. 2018. Wall text, Permanent Exhibition,. Amsterdam School Museum Het Schip, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Appelman, Sonja, Wouter Beekers, John Cüsters, Jos van der Lans, Margriet Pflug. 2016. Canon Volkhuisvesting. Amsterdam: Vereniging Canon Sociaal Werk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barteet, Cody. 2019. Architectural Rhetoric and the Iconography of Authority in Colonial Mexico: The Casa de Montejo. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdsell, David and Leo Groarke. 2007. “Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43(3&4): 103–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blesser, Barry and Linda-Ruth Salter. 2009. Spaces Speak: Are You Listening? Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Manfred, Sigrid Johannisse, and Vladimir Stissi. 1997. Michel de Klerk: Architect and Artist of the Amsterdam School, 1884–1923. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Attitudes Towards History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casciato, Maristella. 1983. “Michel de Klerk: Utopia Built.” In The Amsterdam School: Dutch Expressionist Architecture, 1915–1930, ed. by Wim de Wit, 93–120. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chryslee, Gail J., Sonja K. Foss and Arthur L. Ranney. 1996. “The Construction of Claims in Visual Argumentation.” Visual Communication Quarterly 3(2): 9–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dodd, N. L. and M. P. P. Stultjens. 1996. “Jewish Education in Schools in the Netherlands from 1815 to 1940.” Studia Rosenthaliana 30(1): 67–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finnegan, Cara. 2001. “The Naturalistic Enthymeme and Visual Argument: Photographic Representation in the ‘Skull Controversy.’” Argumentation and Advocacy 371: 133–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, David. 1996. “Can Pictures Be Arguments?” Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1): 11–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, Michelle. 2007. “Seeing the Mind in the Matter: Functional Brain Imaging as Framed Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 431: 175–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, Michael A. 1994. “Multi-modal Argumentation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24(2): 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, Leo. 1996. “Logic, Art and Argument.” Informal Logic 181: 105–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?” Argumentation 291: 133–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Depicting Visual Arguments: An “ART” Approach,” in Informal Logic: A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument, ed. by Federico Puppo, 332–374. Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski, and David Godden. 2016. “Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 521: 217–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahner, Leslie A. 2013. “The Riot Kiss. Framing Memes as Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy 491: 151–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, Gerard. 1999. “Incongruous Bodies: Arguments for Personal Sufficiency and Public Sufficiency.” Argumentation and Advocacy 361: 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heijdra, Ton. 2019. Email to author, September 26, 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heijdra, Ton, Alice Roegholt, and Richelle Wansing. 2012. Workers’ Palace: The Ship by Michel de Klerk. Amsterdam: Museum Het Schip.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Louis M. 1901. Krotten en Sloppen: Een Onderzoek Naar Den Woningtoestand Te Amsterdam Ingesteld in Opdracht Van Den Amsterdamschen Bestuurdersbond. Amsterdam: Van Looy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2003. “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multisemiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inmann, Thomas. 2010. Ancient Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism. New York: Forgotten Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewish Historical Museum. 2018. Wall text, Permanent Exhibition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Ralph H. 2005. Why Visual Arguments? ed. by H. V. Hansen, C. Tindale, and R. H. Johnson. [URL]
Kjeldsen, Jens E. 2007. “Visual Argumentation in Scandinavian Political Advertising: A Cognitive, Contextual and Reception Oriented Approach.” Argumentation and Advocacy 431: 124–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change.” Argumentation 27(4): 425–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation 291: 115–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin. 2014. “Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understand of Fallacies.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36(49): 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin and Mark Aakhus. 2014. “Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.” Argumentation 281: 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, Selma. 1994. We Lived with Dignity: The Jewish Proletariat of Amsterdam, 1900–1940. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Daniel J. 1977. “Two Concepts of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 131: 121–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Och, Gunnar. 2015. “Die Erfindung des Jüdischen Witzes: Diskursanalytische Überlegungen zu Texten des Frühen 19. Jahrhunderts.” In Der Jüdische Witz: Zur Unabgegoltenen Problematik einer Alten Kategorie, ed. by Gunnar Och and Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek, 19–48. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palczewski, Catherine H. 2005. “The Male Madonna and the Feminine Uncle Sam: Visual Argument, Icons, and Ideographs in 1909 Anti-Women Suffrage Postcards.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 91(4): 365–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Steven W. 2010. “‘A Picture Held Us Captive’: The Later Wittgenstein on Visual Argumentation.” Cogency 2(2): 105–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfister, Damien Smith and Carly S. Woods. 2016. “The Unnaturalistic Enthymeme: Figuration, Interpretation, and Critique after Digital Mediation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 521: 236–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Kathleen G. 2017. “Visual Argument in Intercultural Contexts: Perspectives on Folk/Traditional Art.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43(3&4): 152–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roegholt, Alice and Ton Heijdra. 2018. The Dageraad. Amsterdam: Museum Het Schip.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roque, Georges. 2012. “Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal,” in Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory, eds. Frans van Eemeren and Bart Garssen, 273–290. Amsterdam: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searing, Helen E. 1971. Housing in Holland and the Amsterdam School. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
Torrens, Kathleen M. 1999. “Fashion as Argument: Ninetenth-Century Dress Reform.” Argumentation and Advocacy 361: 77–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verzets Resistance Museum. 2018. Wall text, Permanent Exhibition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chi, Jiaqi & Zihan Zhang
2022. 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue