Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 2:3 (2013) ► pp.346–351
Book review
. Proceedings of the 4th Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Tokyo: The Japan Debate Association, 2012.
Reviewed by
Published online: 16 January 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.3.05pop
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.3.05pop
References (8)
Andone, C. 2013. Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clarke, L., and C. Chess. 2008. “Elites and Panic: More to Fear than Fear Itself.” Social Forces, 87 (2): 993–1014.
van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 2007. “The Contextuality of Fallacies.” Informal Logic 27 (1): 59–68.
van Eemeren, F. H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H., P. Houtlosser, C. Ihnen, and M. Lewinski. 2010. “Contextual Considerations in the Evaluation of Argumentation. In Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton’s Theories of Reasoning and Argumentation, ed. by C. Reed, and C. W. Tindale, 115–133. London: College Publications.
