Cover not available

Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 2:2 (2013) ► pp.269–278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

I. Fairclough & N. Fairclough. Political discourse analysis. A method for advanced students. London: Routledge, 2012.

Reviewed by
Published online: 5 August 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.2.08tse
References (14)
References
Andone, Corina. 2010. “Maneuvering Strategically in a Political Interview. Analyzing and Evaluating Responses to an Accusation of Inconsistency.” Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doury, Marianne, Ton van Haaften, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2011. “Strategic Maneuvering in Critical Reactions to Pragmatic Argumentation: The Case of Henry Porter Contra Tony Blair.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 21–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T. 2002. “A Pragma-dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.” Argumentation 161: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart. 1997. Argumentatieschema’s in Pragma-dialectisch Perspectief. Een Theoretisch en Empirisch Onderzoek [Argument schemes in a pragma-dialectical perspective. A theoretical and empirical examination]. With a summary in English. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihnen, Constanza. 2012. “Instruments to Evaluate Pragmatic Argumentation: A Pragmadialectical Perspective.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 143–159. Amsterdam: Springer Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihnen, Constanza, and John E. Richardson. 2011. “On Combining Pragma-dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewínski, Marcin. 2010. Internet Political Discussion Forums as an Argumentative Activity Type. A Pragma-dialectical Analysis of Online Forms of Strategic Manoeuvring in Reacting Critically. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammed, Dima A. 2009. The Honourable Gentelman Should Make up his Mind. Strategic Manoeuvring with Accusations of Inconsistency in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca. 1992. Analysing Complex Argumentation. The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonnard, Yvon. 2011. Getting an Issue on the Table. A Pragma-dialectical study of Presentational Devices in Confrontational Strategic Maneuvering in Dutch Parliament. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue