Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp.243–282

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Legal argumentation in Mesopotamia since Ur III

 | University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Poland
Published online: 28 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19015.sch
Abstract
In this paper, I show that we can find some foundations of logic and legal argumentation in the tablets of Mesopotamia at least since the dynasty of Ur III. In these texts, we see the oldest correct application of logical inference rules (e.g. modus ponens). As concerns the legal argumentation established in Mesopotamia, we can reconstruct on the basis of the tablets the following rules of dispute resolutions during trials: (1) There are two parties of disputants: (i) a protagonist who formulates a standpoint and (ii) an antagonist who disagrees with the protagonist’s standpoint and formulates an alternative statement. (2) There is a rational judge represented by high-ranking citizens who should follow only logical conclusions from facts and law articles as premises.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Archeology of logic
  • 3.The role of court proceedings in dispute resolutions since Ur III
  • 4.Examples of logical and rhetorical arguments from business correspondence
  • 5.Examples of logical arguments from legal proceedings
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (21)
References
Cicero. 2006. On invention, The best kind of orator, Topics (trans: Hubbell, H. M.; Loeb Classical Library 386). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, S. W. 1996. Nippur IV. The Early Neo-Babylonian Governor’s Archive from Nippur. Oriental Institute Publications. Volume 1141. Chicago: the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culbertson, L. E. 2009. Dispute Resolution in the Provincial Courts of the Third Dynasty of Ur. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culbertson, L. Local Courts in Centralizing States: The Case of Ur III Mesopotamia, [in:] Social Theory in Archaeology and Ancient History, 185–202.
Friberg, J. 2007. A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts. Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection Cuneiform Texts I. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtz, Sh. E. 2009. Neo-Babylonian Court Procedure. Series: Cuneiform monographs. Brill: Leiden, Boston. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Neo-Babylonian Trial Records. Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienast, B., Volk, K. 1995. Die Sumerischen und Akkadischen Briefe des III Jahrtausends aus der Zeit vor der III Dynastie von Ur. Freiburg: F. Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lafont, B. 2000. Les texts judiciaries sumériens, [in] Joannes (ed.), Rendre la justice en Mesopotamie. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercer, S. A. B. 1913. The Oath in Cuneiform Inscriptions, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 331, 33–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michalowski, P., Walker, C. B. 1989. A New Sumerian “Law Code”, [in] H. Behrens et al. (eds.), Dumu-e2-dub-ba-a: Studies in Honor of Ake W. Sjoberg. Philadelphia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molina, M. 2000. La ley mas Antigua: Textes legales sumerios. Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. New Ur III Court Records Concerning Slavery, [in:] P. Michalowski (ed.). On the Third Dynasty of Ur: Studies in Honor of Marcel Sigrist. Journal of Cuneiform Studies Supplementary Series 1. ASOR, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, M. 2001. Reading Mesopotamian Law Cases PBS 5 100: A Question of Filiation, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 44/31:243–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, M. T. 1995. Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. With a contribution by Harry A. Hoffner, Ir.; edited by Piotr Michalowski. Scholars Press Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumann, A. 2019a. Did the Neo-Babylonians Construct a Symbolic Logic for Legal Proceedings?, Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLoG Journal of Logics and their Applications, 6(1): 31–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019b. On the Origin of Indian Logic from the Viewpoint of the Pāli Canon, Logica Universalis, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Francisca, A., Henkemans, S., Verheij, B., Wagemans, J. H. M. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D. 1995. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Series: Studies in Argumentation Theory. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisberg, D. B. 2003. Neo-Nabylonian Texts in the Oriental Institute Collection. Oriental Institute Publications. Volume 1141. Chicago: the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Moubarez, Hany
2025. Cuneiform Š umma Sentences: Conditionals or Implications?. Studia Humana 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew & Elena Lisanyuk
2025. Legal Normativism, Argumentation and Logic. Argumentation 39:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Hall, Edith
2022. Some Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Lysias’ Forensic Orations. Trends in Classics 14:2 ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2020. Judgments and Truth: Essays in Honour of Jan Woleński. Studia Humana 9:3-4 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2021. On the Origin of Logical Determinism in Babylonia. Logica Universalis 15:3 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2021. Logical Reasoning for Forecasting in Mesopotamia. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 66:3 ► pp. 721 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2023. Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Schumann, Andrew
2025. The Origins and Worldwide Significance of Judaic Hermeneutics. Religions 16:6 ► pp. 717 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue