Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:3 (2020) ► pp.315–341

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

“Well, in the case of my mom…”

Personal stories as negotiable arguments in public forums

 | Kettering Foundation
 | Kansas State University
Published online: 17 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19005.luk
Abstract
This article is guided by the question: What are the argumentative functions of personal stories in public deliberations? Drawing on the analytical traditions of argumentation theory and discourse analysis, we analyzed three public forums on mental illness, where personal stories were used in a number of argumentative functions. Our analysis reveals that in a deliberative forum personal stories were used as negotiable arguments rather than as mere assertions of individual experience. Personal stories were primarily used as arguments by example to challenge the framing proposed by the moderator and to pitch problem definitions that participants considered most relevant. In this function, personal stories were alternatively engaged as inductive or abductive arguments by other forum participants. Additionally, personal stories were used to support solution proposals and to uphold social ideals.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Personal stories as a prominent feature of public deliberation
    • 2.1Narrative arguments by example
  • 3.Method for analyzing personal stories
    • 3.1Forum participants
    • 3.2Analytical categories
    • 3.3Personal stories vs. personal concern vs. generic narratives
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Effects of issue framing on forum dynamics
    • 4.2Pragmatic functions of personal story arguments
      • 4.2.1Challenging the moderator’s framing
      • 4.2.2Supporting a solution, projecting an ideal
      • 4.2.3Identity statement
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (50)
References
Bex, Floris. 2013a. “Abductive Argumentation with Stories.” ICAIL-2013 Workshop on Formal Aspects of Evidential Inference, Rome (Italy). ([URL], accessed on 24.01.2019).
. 2013b. “Values as the Point of a Story.” In From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making. A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon, ed. by Katie Atkinson, Henry Prakken, and Adam Wyner. 63–78. London: College Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bex, Floris, and Trevor Bench-Capon. 2017. “Arguing with Stories.” In Narration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos. 31–45. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Laura. 2008. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory 181: 93–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Listening to the City: Difference, Identity, and Storytelling in Online Deliberative Groups.” Journal of Public Deliberation 5 (1): article 4. (available at: [URL]).
. 2013. “Framing Democracy and Conflict through Storytelling in Deliberative Groups.” Journal of Public Deliberation 9 (1): article 4. (available at [URL]).
Boswell, John. 2013. “Why and How Narratives Matter in Deliberative Systems.” Political Studies 611: 620–636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Donald. 2014. “Narrative as Deliberative Argument.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways Toward Terrorism and Genocide 7(1): 95–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Walter. 1987. Communication as Narration. Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Govier, Trudy, and Lowell Ayers. 2012. “Logic and Parables: Do these Narratives Provide Arguments?” Informal Logic 32 (2): 161–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, Morwena, and Gale Macleod. 2008. “Personal Narratives and Policy: Never the Twain?” Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain 42 (1): 121–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihnen, Constanza, and John Richards. 2011. “On Combining Pragma-Dialectics With Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 213–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus. 2002. “What Mediators do with Words: Implementing three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Resolution.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20 (2): 177–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Michael. 2018. “Advancing the Narrative Policy Framework: The Musings of a Potentially Unreliable Narrator.” Policy Studies Journal 46 (4): 724–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Michael, Elizabeth Shanahan, and Mark MacBeth (eds). 2014. The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Michael, and Mark McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to be Wrong.” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jonnes, Dennis. 1990. The Matrix of Narrative: Family Systems and the Semiotics of Story. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majed. 2010. “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzizanowski, Michal. 2010. The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1968. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linde, Charlotte. 1993. Life-stories: The Creation of Coherence. NY, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lukianova, Ekaterina, Igor Tolochin, Genevieve Fuji Johnson, and Katherine R. Knobloch. 2019. “Varieties and Effects of Emotional Content in Public Deliberation: A Comparative Analysis of Advocate Arguments at a Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Journal of Language and Politics (online first: ).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury PublishingGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustonen, Anne-Marie, Tommi Paakkonen, Esko Ryokas, and Petteri Nieminen. 2017. “Abortion Debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: Textual Analysis of Experiential Thinking and Argumentation in Parliamentary and Layperson Discussions.” Reproductive Health 141: article 163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olmos, Paula. (ed). 2017. Narration as Argument. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelan, James, and Peter Rabinowitz. 2012. “Time, Plot, Progression.” In Narrative Theory: Core Concepts and Critical Debates, ed. by David Herman, James Phelan, Peter Rabinowitz, Brian Richardson, and Robyn Warhol. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, and John Lee. 2006. “Is Telling Stories Good For Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation after 9/11.” American Sociological Review 711: 699–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryfe, David. 2006. “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 341: 72–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Toward a Sociology of Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1): article 3. (available at [URL])
Sanders, Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 251: 347–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Somashekhar, Sandhya. (2013, June 3). “Obama Calls for National Conversation on Mental Health.” Washington Post.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprain, Leah, and Jessica Hughes. 2015. “A New Perspective of Stories in Public Deliberation: Analyzing Small Stories in Discussions about Immigration.” Text and Talk 35 (4): 531–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steiner, Juergen, Maria Clara Jaramillo, Maia Rousiley, and Simona Mameli. 2017. Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tindale, Christopher. 2017. “Narratives and the Concept of Argument.” In Narration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos. 11–30. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 1988. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. Abington, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1996. The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse in Political Deliberation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1): 11–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns in Discourse.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 6 (1): 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 2005. Abductive Argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy.” Informal Logic 32 (2): 190–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Adam Wyner, and Dan Cartwright. 2010. “Argumentation in the Framework of Deliberation Dialogue.” In Arguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeworld and Shared Reasoning, ed. by Corneliu Bjola, and Markus Kornprobst. 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Black, Laura W., Anna W. Wolfe & Soo-Hye Han
2023. Storytelling and Deliberative Play in the Oregon Citizens’ Assembly Online Pilot on COVID-19 Recovery. American Behavioral Scientist 67:8 ► pp. 963 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue