Cover not available

Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:3 (2019) ► pp.392398

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (20)
References
Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B. 2009. Argumentative design. N. M. Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 1451–174). New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. 2003. Arguig to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Greco Morasso, S., Grossen, M., & Rigotti, E. 2009. Argupolis, a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different communication contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golder, C. 1996. Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne et Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, S. 2011. Argumentation in dispute mediation. A reasonable way to solve conflict. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Compagny. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. 2015. L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. In N. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 39–82). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. 2003. The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J. 2014. Does argumentation matter ? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication. Health Communication, 29(10), 996–1008. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miserez-Caperos, C. 2017. Étude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de Doctorat. Retrieved from [URL]
Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C. 2015. Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 135–149). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E. 2006. Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation, 20(4), 519–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A. 2006. Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. 2010. Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. 2015. Sur l’adéquation des théories de l’argumentation aux sciences de l’apprentissage et les fondements d’une théorie de “l’argumentissage”. In N. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 269–322). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. 2001. The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negociation. Discourse processes, 32(2–3), 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tartas, V., & Simonneaux, L. 2015. Argumentation et conceptualisation en astromonie en classe de CM2 (grade 5). In N. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 135–164). Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue