Cover not available

Article published In: Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2] 2018
► pp. 141–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter

 | Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Published online: 12 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18028.big
Abstract
In this paper, argumentation practices will be discussed in view of their potential for favoring effective information sharing and the creation of ‘emergent common ground’, i.e. the common ground that is sought, created and co-constructed in the process of communication. Argumentation is usually tightly knit with information sharing: if the parties have not previously shared a sufficient amount of relevant knowledge, it is difficult for them to produce effective argumentation. Based on these premises, in this paper the argumentation stages of medical encounters will be viewed as opportunities to reveal and integrate insufficient common ground between clinicians and patients. By relying on the analysis of a corpus of real life encounters in a chronic care setting, the interaction between information sharing and argumentation will be shown, along with problematic cases of misunderstandings or ineffective argumentation due to lack of common ground. Implications for the clinical practice will be discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Medical interactions as ‘advice seeking’ activity types
    • 2.1The role of common ground in the interaction between doctors and patients
    • 2.2The learning process within medical interactions
      • 2.2.1The formation of assessments
  • 3.Aligning assessments in emergent common ground through argumentation
    • 3.1Discussion
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Allan, K. 2013. “What Is Common Ground?” In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, and M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics (pp. 285–310). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asterhan, C. S. C., and B. B. Schwartz. 2009. “Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications from Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog.” Cognitive Science 33 (3):374–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigi, S. 2014. “Key Components of Effective Collaborative Goal Setting in the Chronic Care Encounter.” Communication and Medicine 11 (2):103–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Can Argumentation Skills Become a Therapeutic Resource? Results from an Observational Study in Diabetes Care.” In F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (Eds.). Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 281–294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016a. Communicating (with) Care. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. “Communication Skills for Patient Engagement: Argumentation Competencies as Means to Prevent or Limit Reactance Arousal, with an Example from the Italian Healthcare System.” Frontiers in Psychology, 71:1472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigi, S., and G. Lamiani. 2016. “The Power of Words: Deliberation Dialogue as a Model to Favor Patient Engagement in Chronic Care.” In G. Graffigna (Ed.), Promoting Patient Engagement and Participation for Effective Healthcare Reform (pp. 66–92). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, J. B., Stewart, M., McCracken, E., McWhinney, I. R., and J. Levenstein. 1986. “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 2. Definition and Application.” Family Practice 3 (2):75–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, R. M., and R. L. J. Street. 2011. “The Values and Value of Patient-Centered Care.” Annals of Family Medicine 9 (2):100–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. 2010. “Questioning in Medicine.” In A. F. Freed and S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?”. The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse (pp. 42–68). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, H., Hashimoto, H., and T. Kiuchi. 2013. “The Evolving Concept of “Patient-​Centeredness” In Patient-Physician Communication Research.” Social Science and Medicine (1982) 961:147–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. 2008. “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (3):385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Intercultural Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I., and F. Zhang. 2009. “Activating, Seeking, and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):331–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “On the Dynamic Relations Between Common Ground and Presupposition.” In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, and M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics (pp. 375–396). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., Benson, J., and J. Draper. 2003. “Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides.” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 78 (8):802–809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrie, N. 2012. “Strategic Maneuvering in Treatment Decision-Making Discussions: Two Cases in Point.” Argumentation 26 (2):171–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “The Promise and Prospects of Argumentation for Public Health Communication.” Journal of public health research 4 (1):547–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrie, N., and P. Schulz. 2014. “The Effects of General Practitioners’ Use of Argumentation to Support Their Treatment Advice: Results of an Experimental Study Using Video-​Vignettes.” Health communication 30 (10):951–961. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Exploring the Relationships Between Participatory Decision-Making, Visit Duration, and General Practitioners’ Provision of Argumentation to Support their Medical Advice: Results from a Content Analysis.” Patient education and counseling 98 (5):572–577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrie, N., Schulz, P., and S. Zurbriggen. 2015. “The Effects of Reasoned Shared Decision-Making on Consultation Outcomes: Results of a Randomized-Controlled Experiment Among a Student Population.” Studies in Communication Sciences 15 (2):182–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamiani, G., Bigi, S., Mancuso, M. E., Coppola, A., and E. Vegni. 2017. “Applying a Deliberation Model to the Analysis of Consultations in Haemophilia: Implications for Doctor-Patient Communication.” Patient Education and Counseling 100 (4):690–695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamiani, G., Strada, I., Mancuso, M. E., Coppola, A., Vegni, E., and E. A. Moja; the Pro-Adherence Study Group. 2015. “Factors Influencing Illness Representations and Perceived Adherence in Haemophilic Patients: A Pilot Study.” Haemophilia 21 (5):598–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levenstein, J., McCracken, E., McWhinney, I. R., Stewart, M., and J. B. Brown. 1986. “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 1. A Model for the Doctor-Patient Interaction in Family Medicine.” Family Practice 3 (1):24–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1992. “Activity Types and Language.” In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macagno, F. forthcoming. “Practical Reasoning and the Act of Naming Reality.” Revue internationale de philosophie.
Mead, N., and P. Bower. 2000. “Patient-Centredness: a Conceptual Framework and Review of the Empirical Literature.” Social Science and Medicine (1982) 51 (7):1087–1110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moja, E., and E. Vegni. 1998. “La Medicina Centrata sul Paziente.” Annali di Medicina Interna 131:56–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, D., Chen, Y., and S. Ju. 2018. “Argumentative Patterns in Chinese Medical Consultations.” Argumentation, 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilgram, R. 2009. “Argumentation in Doctor-Patient Interaction: Medical Consultation as a Pragma-Dialectical Communicative Activity Type.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2):153–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, M. G., Leone, D., and S. Bigi. 2017. “The Ethical Convenience of Non-Neutrality in Medical Encounters: Argumentative Instruments for Healthcare Providers.” Teoria 37 (2):139–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubinelli, S. 2013. “Rational versus Unreasonable Persuasion in Doctor–Patient Communication: A Normative Account.” Patient Education and Counseling 92 (3):296–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, P. 2015. “Argumentation and Persuasion in Patient-Centred Communication.” Patient Education and Counseling 981:543–544. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., and J. Draper. 1998. Skills for Communicating with Patients. Oxon: Radcliff Medical Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. 2016. “Argumentative Patterns in Over-the-Counter Medicine Advertisements.” Argumentation 301:81–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, M., and D. Roter. 1989. Communicating with Medical Patients. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Levenstein, J., McCracken, E., and I. R. McWhinney. 1986. “The Patient-Centred Clinical Method. 3. Changes in Residents’ Performance over Two Months of Training.” Family Practice 3 (3):164–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., and T. L. Freeman (Eds). 1995. Patient Centered Medicine; Transforming the Clinical Method. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., and P. Houtlosser. 2005. “Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” OSSA Conference Archive, Paper 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Poppel, L. 2014. “The Strategic Function of Variants of Pragmatic Argumentation in Health Brochures.” In S. Rubinelli and A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Argumentation and health (pp. 97–112). (Benjamins current topics; No. 64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veldhuijzen, W. 2011. Challenging the Patient Centred Paradigm: Designing Feasible Guidelines for Doctor-Patient Communication. Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierda, R., and J. Visser. 2012. “Direct-to-Consumer Advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):81–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Kleschatzky, Elisabeth & Kati Hannken-Illjes
2025. Non-comparability and unplannability as material topoi in antenatal care conversations. Patient Education and Counseling 133 ► pp. 108624 ff. DOI logo
Li, Chengtuan, Jing Han & Zhiwei Zhao
2025. Establishing emergent common ground. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Akkermans, Aranka, Sanne Prins, Amber S. Spijkers, Jean Wagemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Dick L. Willems, Marcus J. Schultz, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath, Job B. M. van Woensel, Marc van Heerde, Anton H. van Kaam, Moniek van de Loo, Anne Stiggelbout, Ellen M. A. Smets & Mirjam A. de Vos
2023. Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine 49:4 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Bigi, Sarah & Maria Grazia Rossi
2023. Fostering interdisciplinary knowledge translation at the interface between healthcare communication and pragmatics. In A Pragmatic Agenda for Healthcare [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 338], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Chengtuan
2022. A study of linguistic manipulations of activating, seeking and creating common ground in intercultural business communication. Pragmatics and Society 13:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Bigi, Sarah
2021. Achieving shared understanding in chronic care interactions: the role of caregivers. Working with Older People 25:3 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Akkermans, Aranka, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Nanon H. M. Labrie, Inge Henselmans & Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
2019. Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2018. Commentary on “The role of argumentative strategies in the construction of emergent common ground in a patient-centered approach to the medical encounter”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue