Commentary published In: Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2] 2018
► pp. 228–230
Commentary
Published online: 12 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18025.pop
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18025.pop
References (8)
Eemeren, Frans H. van. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin / Dordrecht: De Gruyter / Floris.
. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser. 2006. “Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation 201: 381–392.
Labrie, Nanon. 2012. “Strategic maneuvering in treatment decision-making discussions: Two cases in point.” Argumentation 261: 171–199.
Pilgram, Roosmaryn. 2009. “Argumentation in doctor–patient interaction: Medical consultation as a pragma-dialectical communicative activity type.” Studies in Communication Sciences 91: 153–169.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca. 2011. “Shared medical decision-making: Strategic maneuvering by doctors in the presentation of their treatment preferences to patients.” In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden, and Gordon Mitchell, 1811–1818. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Sic Sat.