Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 7:3 (2018) ► pp.316–346

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Engaging publics through climate math

Lessons from Boulder’s 2016 Climate Action Plan

 | University of Colorado Boulder
 | University of Colorado Boulder
 | University of Colorado Boulder
 | University of Colorado Boulder
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18020.nap
Abstract
Energy democracy hopes to foster community engagement and participation in shaping our transition from fossil fuels to a renewable energy-based economy. These considerations result from critiques by environmental justice, climate justice, and just transition advocates. Although many are sympathetic to energy democracy ideals, climate goals often are articulated in math terms. This essay defines the aforementioned key terms and asks: what are the limitations and possibilities of engaging publics when climate action solely is articulated in numbers? A compelling case study is the City of Boulder – recognized as a global leader in climate science and a national leader in innovative environmental planning. This essay shares work from 2016, when the City shared a climate action plan for public feedback, supported several public participation events, and passed climate action legislation goals. We argue a just transition and energy democracy ideals are hindered if we reduce climate goals to math.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Case study background
  • Math as a climate action approach
  • Climate action plans as rhetorical genre
    • CAPS as a rhetorical genre
    • CAPS, argumentation, and public participation
  • Methods
  • Boulder’s bold plan
    • Carbon counting
    • Time
    • Accountability
    • Energy democracy
  • City designed “dialogues”
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (73)
References
350.org. n.d. Retrieved from [URL]
400.350.org. n.d. “400 PPM.” Retrieved from [URL]
Aakhus, Mark. 1999. “Science Court: Case Study in Designing Discourse to Manage Policy Controversy.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12(2): 20–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aakhus, Mark, and Marcin Lewiński. 2017. “Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy.” Argumentation 31 (1): 179–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Benjamin. 2017. “A Mathematical Model of Altruism.” The Atlantic. Retrieved from [URL]
Antonick, Gary. 2013. “The Mathematics of Climate Change.” The New York Times, Retrieved from [URL]
Armstrong, Andrea, and Harriet Bulkeley. 2014. “Micro-Hydro Politics: Producing and Contesting Community Energy in the North of England.” Geoforum 561: 66–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asen, Robert. 2010. “Reflections on the Role of Rhetoric in Public Policy.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13 (1):121–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Democracy, Deliberation, and Education. College Station, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Ingrid, Ann Peterson, Gregory Brown, and Clive McAlpine. 2012. “Local Government Response to the Impacts of Climate Change: An Evaluation Of Local Climate Adaptation Plans.” Landscape and Urban Planning 1071:127–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassett, Ellen, and Vivek Shandas. 2010. Innovation and climate action planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (4):435–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Laura W. 2008. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory 18 (1):93–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulder’s Climte Commitment. 2017. Boulder’s Climate Commitment: Rising to the Climate Challenge, Powering a Vibrant Future. Retrieved from [URL]
Bridge, Gavin. 2010. “Geographies of peak oil: The other carbon problem.” Geoforum 41 (4): 523–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carcasson, Martín, and Leah Sprain. 2016. “Beyond Problem Solving: Reconceptualizing the Work of Public Deliberation as Deliberative Inquiry.” Communication Theory 261: 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castán Broto, Vanesa, and Harriet Bulkeley. 2013. “A Survey of Urban Climate Change Experiments in 100 Cities.” Global Environmental Change 231: 92–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
City of Boulder. 2017. “City of Boulder Announces 2017 Boulder Energy Challenge Winners.” Retrieved from [URL]
Cook, John, Naomi Oreskes, Peter T. Doran, William R. L. Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed W. Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton, Stephan Lewandowsky, Andrew G. Skuce, and Sarah A. Green. 2016. “Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Human-Caused Global Warming.” Environmental Research Letters 111:1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. 2007. “Nature’s ‘Crisis Disciplines’: Does Environmental Communication Have an Ethical Duty?” Environmental Communication 11: 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Onís, Catalina M., and Phaedra C. Pezzullo. 2017. “The Ethics of Embodied Engagement: Ethnographies of Environmental Justice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Justice, ed. by Ryan Holifield, Jayajit Chakraborty, and Gordon Walker, 231–240. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delgado, Fernando Pedro. 1995. “Chicano Movement Rhetoric: An Ideographic Interpretation.” Communication Quarterly 431: 446–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2014. Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairchild, Denise. 2017. “Conclusion: Building an Energy Democracy Movement.” In Energy Democracy: Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions, ed. by Denise Fairchild, and Al Weinrub, 239–250. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairchild, Denise, and Al Weinrub. 2017. “Introduction.” In Energy Democracy: Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions, ed. by Denise Fairchild, and Al Weinrub, 1–20. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gastil, John. 2008. Political Communication and Deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. Thomas. 2012a. “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 481: 198–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Note on 21st Century Critical Communication Inquiry.” Argumentation & Advocacy 48(4): 258 – 267. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jean. 2011. “Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts.” Argumentation, 25 (3): 285–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jean, and Lee Honeycutt. 2009. “When Science Goes Public: From Technical Arguments to Appeals to Authority.” Studies in Communication Sciences 9 (2): 19–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffin, Leland G. 1964. “The Rhetorical Structure of the ‘New Left’ Movement: Part I.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 501: 113–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammerback, John C., and Richard J. Jensen. 1994. “Ethnic Heritage as Rhetorical Legacy: The Plan of Delano.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 801: 53–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hicks, Darrin, and Lenore Langsdorf. 1999. “Regulating Disagreement, Constituting Participants: A Critique of Proceduralist Theories of Democracy.” Argumentation 13 (2): 139–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoornweg, Daniel, Mila Freire, Marcus J. Lee, Perinaz Bhada-Tata, and Belinda Yuen. 2011. Cities and Climate Change: Responding to an Urgent Agenda. Retrieved from [URL]
Hunt, Alistair, and Paul Watkiss. 2011. “Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in Cities: A Review of the Literature.” Climatic Change 1041: 13–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Sally. 2008. “Black Box Arguments.” Argumentation 221: 437–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Design Thinking in Argumentation Theory and Practice.” Argumentation 291: 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Sally, and Mark Aakhus. 2014. “Becoming More Reflective About the Role of Design in Communication.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 42 (2): 125–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, Andrew, Tim Rayner, Heike Schroeder, Neil Adger, Kevin Anderson, Alice Bows, Corinne Le Quéré, Manoj Joshi, Sarah Mander, Nem Vaughan, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2013. “Going Beyond Two Degrees? The Risks and Opportunities of Alternative Options.” Climate Policy 131: 751–769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just Transition Collaborative (JTC) (n.d.). Just Transition Collaborative University of Colorado Boulder. Retrieved from [URL]
Kahn, Brian. 2016, September 27. “The World Passes 400 PPM Threshold. Permanently.” Climate Central. Retrieved from [URL]
Maldonado, Julie, Heather Lazrus, Shiloh-Kay Bennett, Karletta Chief, Carla May Dhillon, Bob Gough, Linda Kruger, Jeff Morisette, Stefan Petrovic, and Kyle Powys Whyte. 2016. “The Story of Rising Voices: Facilitating Collaboration Between Indigenous and Western Ways of Knowing.” In Responses to Disasters and Climate Change: Understanding Vulnerability and Fostering Resilience, ed. by Michele Companion and Miriam S. Chaiken, 15–26. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez, Cecilia. 2017. “From Commodification to the Commons: Charting the Pathway for Energy Democracy.” In Energy Democracy: Advancing Equity in Clean Energy Solutions, ed. by Denise Fairchild, and Al Weinrub, 21–36. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill. 2012, July 19. “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math.” The Rolling Stone. Retrieved from [URL]
Middleton, Michael, Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook. 2015. Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric In Situ. New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Middleton, Michael, Samantha Senda-Cook, and Danielle Endres. 2011. “Articulating Rhetorical Field Methods: Challenges and Tensions.” Western Journal of Communication 75 (4): 386–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millard-Ball, Adam. 2012. “The Limits to Planning: Causal Impacts of City Climate Action Plans.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 331: 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musi, Elena, and Mark Aakhus. 2018. “Discovering Argumentative Patterns in Energy Polylogues: A Macroscope for Argument Mining.” Argumentation 32 (3): 397–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neves, Ana Rita, and Vitor Leal. 2010. “Energy Sustainability Indicators for Local Energy Planning: Review of Current Practices and Derivation of a New Framework.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 141: 2723–2735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nield, David. 2016, November 16. “More Than 6,000 Cities Are Already Crushing Carbon Emission Targets For 2020.” Science Alert, Retrieved from [URL]
Paliewicz, Nicholas. 2012. “Global Warming and the Interaction between the Public and Technical Spheres of Argument: When Standards for Expertise Really Matter.” Argumentation and Advocacy 481: 231–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paliewicz, Nicholas S., and George, F. (Guy) McHendry, Jr. 2017. “When Good Arguments Do Not Work: Post-Dialectics, Argument Assemblages, and the Networks of Climate Skepticism.” Argumentation and Advocacy 531: 287–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearce, Warren, Reiner Grundmann, Mike Hulme, Sujatha Raman, Eleanor Hadley Kershaw, and Judith Tsouvalis. 2017. “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus.” Environmental Communication 231: 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pezzullo, Phaedra C. 2007. Toxic Tourism: Rhetorics of Pollution, Travel, and Environmental Justice. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Afterword: Decentering & Regenerating the Field.” In Text + Field: Innovations in Rhetorical Methods, eds. by Sara McKinnon, Robert Asen, Karma R. Chávez, and Robert Glenn Howard, 177–188. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Unearthing the Marvelous: Environmental Imprints in Rhetorical Criticism.” Review of Communication 161: 25–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pezzullo, Phaedra C., and Robert J. Cox. 2017. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (5th eds.). Thousand Oaks, C: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (5th eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pezzullo, Phaedra C., and Catalina M. de Onís. 2018. “Rethinking Rhetorical Field Methods on a Precarious Planet.” Communication Monographs 85 (1): 103–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sierra Club (n.d.). “Is Your City #readyfor100?” Retrieved from [URL]
Simons, Herbert W. 1970. “Requirements, Problems, and Strategies: A theory of Persuasion for Social Movements.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 561: 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Linda T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprain, Leah, and Hughes, Jessica M. F. 2015. “A New Perspective on Stories in Public Deliberation: Analyzing Small Stories in Discussions About Immigration.” Text & Talk 351: 531–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, Charles J., Craig Allen Smith, and Robert E. Denton. 2012. Persuasion and Social Movements (6th ed.) Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (3rd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UN-HABITAT. 2012. State of the World’s Cities 2012/2013 – Prosperity of Cities. London: Earthscan. Retrieved from [URL]
Warner, Koko, Kees van der Geest, Sönke Kreft, Saleemul Huq, Sven Harmeling, Koen Kusters, and Alex de Sherbinin. 2012. “Evidence From the Frontlines of Climate Change: Loss and Damage to Communities Despite Coping and Adaptation.” Loss and Damage in Vulnerable Countries Initiative. Policy Report. Report No. 9. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, Elke U., and Paul C. Stern. 2011. “Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States.” American Psychologist 661: 315–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whyte, Kyle. 2017. “Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” English Language Notes 55 (1–2): 153–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
World-Bank. 2010. Cities and Climate Change: An Urgent Agenda. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yalçın, Melike, and Benoit Lefèvre. 2012. “Local Climate Action Plans in France: Emergence, Limitations and Conditions for Success.” Environmental Policy and Governance 221: 104–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Iris M. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. by Seyla Benhabib, 120–136. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Hipnar, Ashley & Mônica Haddad
2025. Global Cities at the Crossroads: Pursuing Justice in Planning for Climate Change. Journal of Planning Literature DOI logo
Kiskaddon, Erin, P. Soupy Dalyander, Allison DeJong, Colleen McHugh, Jessi Parfait, Abby Littman, Scott A. Hemmerling & Alyssa Dausman
2023. Evaluation of emission reduction and other societal and environmental outcomes: Structured decision making for the Louisiana climate action plan. Journal of Environmental Management 345 ► pp. 118936 ff. DOI logo
Wahlund, Madeleine & Jenny Palm
2022. The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science 87 ► pp. 102482 ff. DOI logo
Paliewicz, Nicholas S. & George F. (Guy) McHendry, Jr.
2020. Post-dialectics and fascistic argumentation in the global climate change debate. Argumentation and Advocacy 56:3 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue