Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp.214–244

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The strategic use of argumentation from example in re-evaluating a people

The case of Al Aswany’s pro-democratization columns

 | Ain Shams University, Cairo
Published online: 25 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17031.oma
Abstract
With the help of the extended pragma-dialectical theory, this paper aims to analyze how Al Aswany, an Egyptian political columnist who argued in favor of the feasibility of democratization before the Arab Spring, maneuvered strategically by argumentation from example in two of his columns in supporting the standpoint that the Egyptian people had become no longer politically inactive. The analysis is conducted in view of the institutional preconditions of political columns and the specific rhetorical exigency a columnist may face in this specific argumentative situation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The argumentative predicament of evaluating a political group by means of examples
    • 2.1Argumentation from example: An overview
    • 2.2Potential maneuvers in evaluating a political group
    • 2.3The characterization of political columns as a macro context
  • 3.The image of the Egyptian people and political activism in Mubarak’s era: A description of the rhetorical exigency
  • 4.The “Egypt Awakened” case
  • 5.“The Coming Civil Disobedience on April 6th.” Case
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Arthos, J. 2003. Where there are no rules or systems to guide us: Argument from example in hermeneutic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech 89(4), pp. 320–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aswany, A. 2011. On the state of Egypt. (J. Wright, Trans.). Cairo/NY: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beinin, F. 2009. Workers’ struggles under ‘socialism’ and ‘neoliberalism’. In R. Mahdi, & P. Marfleet (Eds.), Egypt: Moment of change. (pp. 87–102). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demon, K. 1997. A paradigm for the analysis of paradigms: The rhetorical exemplum in ancient and imperial Greek theory. Rhetorica 15 (2), pp. 125–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. In context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation 251, (pp. 141–161). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Berlin / Dordrecht: De Gruyter / Floris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. A Systematic Theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Strategic manoeuvring. Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. (pp. 131–160). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Houtlosser, P. 2005. More about an arranged marriage. In C. A. Willard (Ed.), Critical problems in argumentation. Selected papers from the 13th Biennial Conference on Argumentation Sponsored by the American Forensic Association and National Communication Association August, 2003. Washington, DC: National Communication Association, (pp. 345–355).
2006. Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation 201, pp. 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. 2007. Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. 2013. Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garssen, B. 1997. Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. NY: International Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. N. & Townsley, E. 2011. The space of opinion: Media intellectuals and the public sphere. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khatib, L. 2010. Arab film and Islamic fundamentalism. In J. Curran (Ed.), Media and society (pp. 316–334) London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Omar, A. 2016. Strategic maneuvering in supporting the feasibility of political change: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Egyptian anti-regime columns. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). London: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published in 1958)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plug, H. J. 2017. The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren & Peng, W. (Eds.) Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics. (pp. 159–177). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salisbury, H. 1988. A time of change: A reporter’s tale of our time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2009. Revolution: Facebook-style. The New York Times Magazine. (22/1/2009). [Retrieved from: [URL]]
Soliman, S. 2011. The autumn of dictatorship: Fiscal crisis and political change in Egypt under Mubarak. (P. Daniel, Trans.) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swedenburg, T. 2012. Imagined Youths. In R. Mahdi, & P. Marfleet, (Eds.), Egypt: Moment of change. (pp. 285–294). Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabishat, M. 2012. Society in cinema: Anticipating the revolution in Egyptian fiction and movies. Social Research 79(2), pp. 377–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarouty, S. 2015. Businessmen, clientelism, and authoritarianism in Egypt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Younis, S. 2014 Hal Kanat al-Thawrah Tahwul Demoqrati: al-Dawlah wa al-Thawrah wa al-Demoqratiyyah [Was the revolution a democratic transition? State, revolution, and democracy]. al-Demoqratiyyah [Journal of Democracy] 61. Cairo: Markaz al-Ahram [Retrieved from: [URL]].
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue