Article published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 7:1 (2018) ► pp.1–17
Establishing validity among pre-school children
Published online: 7 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.16019.han
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.16019.han
Abstract
This paper lays out theoretical considerations and first analyses on the giving of and asking for reasons among preschool children age 3–7 in natural child-child play interaction. We attempt to give an integrated, multimodal analysis of the verbal, paraverbal and extraverbal means of these reasoning activities. In our data we find many instances of younger children who are giving reasons during play interaction. Often these reasoning activities do not occur in an open conflict and are not primarily directed at working out a local dissensus. Rather, these interactions seem to foreground the epistemic function of argumentation. We will argue that these practices should be understood and researched as early forms of argumentation.
Keywords: argumentation, validity, child-child communication, cooperation, multimodality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Children arguing: between the management of dissensus and the establishment of validity
- 3.“Embodied eloquence”, multimodality and protorhetoric
- 4.Method and data
- 5.Two exemplary analyses
- 5.1What is a restaurant?
- 5.2“Now it works supergood”
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (31)
Andresen, H. 2005. Vom Sprechen zum Schreiben. Sprachentwicklung zwischen dem vierten und siebten Lebensjahr. Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart.
Antos, G. 1985. Proto-Rhetorik. Zur Ontogenese rhetorischer Fähigkeiten. In: Dyck, J., Jens, W., Ueding, G. (Ed.): Rhetorik. Ein internationales Jahrbuch Bd. 4. De Gruyter: Tübingen, 7–28.
Arendt, B. 2015. Kindergartenkinder argumentieren. Peer-Gespräche als Erwerbskontext. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 62/ 1, 21–33.
Bose, I. 2003. „doch da sin ja nur muster.“ Kindlicher Sprechausdruck im sozialen Rollenspiel. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main.
Bose, I. and K. Hannken-Illjes. 2012. Protorhetorik. In: Ueding, G. (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Bd. 101: Nachträge A-Z. De Gruyter: Berlin, S. 966–975.
Conley, T. 2000. What Counts as Topos in Contemporary Research. In: Schirren, T., Ueding, G. (Eds.): Topik und Rhetorik. Niemeyer: Tübingen, 579–586.
Crowell, A. and D. Kuhn. 2014. Developing dialogic argumentation skills. A 3-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development 15/ 2, 363–381.
Doury, M. 2012. Preaching to the converted. Why argue when everyone agrees? Argumentation 261, 99–114.
Gunn, J. 2007. Gimme Some Tongue (On Recovering Speech). Quarterly Journal of Speech 93/ 3, 361–364.
Hannken-Illjes, K. 2008. On Building a Winning Team. In: Hans Hansen, Christopher Tindale (Eds.), Proceedings of the OSSA-Conference on Argumentation. Windsor, Canada. (CD-ROM).
Jacquin, J. 2015. Multi-modal Counterargumentation in the Workplace: The Contribution of Gesture and Gaze to the Expression of Disagreement. GESPIN 4, 155–160.
Johnstone Jr., H. 1965. Some Reflections on Argumentation. In: Natanson, M., Johnstone Jr., H. (Hg): Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Argumentation. Pennsylvania State UP: University Park, 1–9.
Klein, W. 1980. Argumentation und Argument. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 10, 38/391, 9–57.
Knoblauch, H. 2000. Topik und Soziologie. Von der sozialen zur kommunikativen Topik. In: Schirren, T. / Ueding, G. (Hg.): Topik und Rhetorik. Niemeyer: Tübingen, 651–668.
Krummheuer, G. 1995. The ethnography of argumentation. In: Cobb, P., Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.): The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 229–269.
Kyratzis, A., T. Shuqum Ross and S. B. Koymen. 2010. Validating justifications in preschool girls’ and boys’ friendship group talk implications for linguistic and socio-cognitive development. Journal of Child Language 37/ 1, 115–144.
Miller, M. 1980. Zur Ontogenese moralischer Argumentationen. Zs. F. Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 10, 38/391: 58–108.
Muller-Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A. -N., Tartas, V. and Iannaconne, A. 2009. Psychosocial Processes in Argumentation. In: Muller-Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A. -N. (Hg.): Argumentation and Education. Theoretical Foundations and Practices. Springer: Berlin, 67–90.
Perret-Clermont, A. -N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S. and Miserez-Caperos, C. 2015. Knowledge-Oriented Argumentation in Children. In: Garssen, B. J., Godden, D., Mitchell, G. and Snoeck Henkemans, F. (Hg.): Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. SicSat: Amsterdam, 1118–1126.
Pontecorvo, C. and F. Arcidiacono. 2010. Development of Reasoning through Arguing in Young Children. Культурно-Историческая Психология/ Cultural-Historical Psychology 4, 19–29.
Resnick, L. B., S. Michaels, and C. O’Connor. 2010. How (Well-structured) Talk Builds the Mind. In: R. Sternberg and D. Preiss (Hg.), From Genres to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Education Research and their Applications. Springer: New York, 163–194.
Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., Stukenbrock, A. and Uhmann, S. 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10, 353–402.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kleschatzky, Elisabeth & Kati Hannken-Illjes
Bubikova-Moan, Jarmila & Margareth Sandvik
Convertini, Josephine
Hannken-Illjes, Kati
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
