Article published In: Argumentation and Health
Edited by Sara Rubinelli and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
[Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:1] 2012
► pp. 33–50
Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority
A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions
Published online: 27 February 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil
Argumentation can play an important role in medical consultation. A doctor could, for instance, argue in support of a treatment advice to overcome a patient’s hesitance about it. In this argumentation, the doctor might explicitly present him- or herself as an authority, thereby presenting an argument by authority. Depending on the specific conditions under which the doctor advances such an argument, the doctor’s argument by authority can constitute a sound or a fallacious contribution to the discussion. In this paper, I shall determine what the specific soundness conditions are that apply to a doctor’s argumentation by authority in medical consultation.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Mitchell, Gordon R.
2023. Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on
potentially pandemic pathogens. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Bogaards, Maarten
Labrie, Nanon
Rivera, Francisco Javier Uribe & Elizabeth Artmann
Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz
Miserez Caperos, Celine
2013. Review of Macedo (): The development of children’s argument skills. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:2 ► pp. 267 ff.
Rubinelli, Sara
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
