Cover not available

Review published In: Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 10:2 (2021) ► pp.262–272

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Frans H. van Eemeren. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer, 2018. 199 pp.

Reviewed by
 | University of Innsbruck
Published online: 5 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00013.kie
References (43)
References
Blair, J. Anthony. 2010. “Logic in the Pragma-Dialectical theory.” In Frans H. van Eemeren et al. (Eds.), ISSA Proceedings 2010. ([URL]; last seen November 28, 2018)
Dijk, Teun A. van and Kintsch, Walter. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.). 2002. Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2015. Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). 1994. Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Maintaining a delicate balance.” In Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and Tjark Kruiger. 1978. Argumentatietheorie. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative indicators in discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels. 2009. Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H. M. Wagemans 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.) (2011). Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtlosser, Peter and Agnès van Rees (Eds.). 2006. Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip. 2006. How we reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalinowski, Georges. 1972. Einführung in die Normenlogik. Frankfurt/M.: Athenäum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 1998. “Speech Act Sequences in Latin prose: Questions and Answers.” In: Charles M. Ternes and Dominique Longrée (éd.), Oratio soluta – oratio numerosa. Les mécanismes linguistiques de cohésion et de rupture dans la prose latine (pp. 65–86). Luxembourg: Centre Alexandre-Wiltheim.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Impoliteness and emotional arguments.” Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), 243–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Fiktive Argumente.” In Carl Friedrich Gethmann (ed.), Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft (pp. 505–538). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Whose Freedom? The Battle over America‘s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David K. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 21 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1983. Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian. 1998. “Les raisons des émotions.” In Marina Bondi (ed.), Forms of Argumentative Discourse (pp. 3–50). Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. L’argumentation. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, Monika and Jeannette Chur. 1996. Semantik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society 51, 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Jacky. 2016. A dialogue game for critical discussion. Groundwork in the formalisation and computerisation of the pragma-dialectical model of argumentation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, John. 2004. The death of argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, John and Douglas N. Walton. 1989. Fallacies. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. The Place of emotion in argumentation. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Appeal to Pity. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Scare Tactics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 1976. Studien zur Sprechakttheorie. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue