In:Verb Classes and Aspect
Edited by Elisa Barrajón López, José Luis Cifuentes Honrubia and Susana Rodríguez Rosique
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 9] 2015
► pp. 264–287
Some reflections on verbs with clitic increase
Verbs of motion
Published online: 25 November 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.12gar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.9.12gar
In this paper we will address the different values of se, one of the classic problems in Spanish grammar. Specifically, we will talk about the clitic which in the usual descriptions has no argumental value and is non-referential: the clitic sometimes called the reflexive-intensive and more recently the aspectual. We will also examine the clitic which appears with a number of verbs of motion and has also been termed aspectual. As we are dealing with a paradigmatic use of se, we will use the term “clitic increase” in order not to give the impression that we are dealing with a specific problem of the form se. This study is set out as follows: in Section 1 we introduce the two structures to be analysed. The first, is the use with transitive verbs, what we might call prototypical (comerse la paella ([to eat up the paella]) and the second deals with intransitive verbs. In Section 2, verbs of motion with clitic increase are analysed, the more relevant grammatical properties are described and a constant meaning is assigned to the appearance of the clitic. This leads us to a proposal for syntactic analysis in which the clitic is the head of the VoiceP. Then, in Section 3, we review the main properties of the first structure type and we show that our analysis also takes these into consideration. In 4, we consider the question of whether the differences introduced by the appearance of the clitic should be explained by lexicon or grammar. We end with conclusions and bibliography.
Keywords: agentivity, clitic ‘se’, control, movement verbs, thematic roles
References (24)
Armstrong, Grant. 2013. “Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive se constructions in Spanish.” Borealis: An international journal of Hispanic linguistics 2 (2): 81–128.
Bogard, Sergio. 2006. “El clítico se. Valores y evolución.” In Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, Concepción Company y Company (dir.), vol. 2, 755–870, México: FCE-UNAM.
Bull, William. 1952. “The Intransitive Reflexive: Ir and Irse.” The Modern Language Journal 36 (8): 382–386.
Cartagena, Nelson. 1972. Sentido y estructura de las construcciones pronominales en español. Concepción: Publicaciones del Instituto Central de Lenguas, Universidad de Concepción.
Cuervo, Rufino José. 1874. Notas a la gramática de la lengua castellana de don Andrés Bello. Edición, variantes y estudio preliminar por Ignacio Ahumada Lara, Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo, 1981.
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico.” In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte (eds.), 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
De Miguel, Elena and Fernández Lagunilla, Marina. 2000. “El operador aspectual se.” Revista Española de Lingüística 30 (1): 13–43.
Di Tullio, Ángela. 2012. “La interpretación del se no argumental: La lectura agentiva frente a la lectura aspectual.” Unpublished manuscript. Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina. Video conference: [URL]
Doron, Edith. 2005. “The aspect of Agency in Erteschik-Shir.” In The syntax of aspect. Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport (eds.), 154–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador. 1986. Gramática Española. 4. El verbo y la oración. Volume ordered and completed by Ignacio Bosque. Madrid: Arco / Libros.
Folli, Raffaella and Harley, Heidi. 2005. “Consuming results in Italian and English: Flavours of v.” In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova (eds.), 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
García Fernández, Luis. 2011. “Algunas observaciones sobre se aspectual.” In Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto, Juan Cuartero Otal, Luis García Fernández and Carsten Sinner (eds.), 43–71. München: Peniope.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. “On external arguments.” In Functional Projections, Elena Benedicto and Jeffrey Runner (eds.), 103–130. Amherst: Massachusetts.
. 1996. “Severing the external argument from its verb.” In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. “Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics.” In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem and Peter van Emde Boas (eds.), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.
. 1991. “Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution.” In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag and Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), 29–53. Stanford: CSLI.
Nishida, Chiyo. 1994. “The Spanish reflexive clitic ‘se’ as an aspectual class marker.” Linguistics 32 (3): 425–458.
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Kamyshna, I.I., L.B. Pavlovych & A.M. Kamyshnyi
de Benito Moreno, Carlota
de Benito Moreno, Carlota
Fábregas, Antonio
Quintana Hernández, Lucía
Armstrong, Grant
2018.
se-marked directed motion constructions. In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 15], ► pp. 11 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
