Cover not available

In:The Loss of Primordial Language and the Future of National Languages
Edited by Irene Capdevila and Francesc Feliu
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 47] 2026
► pp. 88–101

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

On the loss of Lithuanian in former East Prussia

A case of “Linguistic Necrosis”

 | University of Pisa
Published online: 23 March 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.47.06cer
Abstract
This article discusses the history of the Lithuanian language as spoken (and written) in the territories of former East Prussia and its recent decline. At the present time, this language has practically disappeared from the region (i.e. today’s Kaliningrad Oblast) even though it successfully coexisted with other languages there for many centuries. Beginning with the importance of Prussian Lithuanian for the development of the Lithuanian language tout court, this contribution aims to reconstruct the orientations of the various language policies that have alternated from the 16th century until today. In particular, the relationship of unequal bilingualism with the long-term hegemonic language of the area, German, will be examined. Since the Second World War, Russification policies (involving demography, regional languages, toponymy, etc.) have created the conditions for a sort of “linguistic necrosis”, i.e. the localised death of this language — which, happily, still remains very much alive in the Republic of Lithuania. The historical trajectory of Prussian Lithuanian has found a symbolic conclusion in the recent closure of the section for Lithuanian studies at Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University in Kaliningrad.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical background: The Age of Reformation
  • 3.German and Lithuanian: Unequal bilingualism
    • 3.1Unfavourable factors
    • 3.2Favourable factors
  • 4.Germanisation
  • 5.Russification
  • 6.The present day
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Aleknavičienė, Ona and Christiane Schiller (eds.) 2008. Jokūbo Perkūno traktatas Wohlgegründetes bedenken über die ins litauische übersetzten zehn Fabeln aesopi und derselben passionierte zuschrift. Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aleknavičienė, Ona. 2022. “Lietuvių kalba kaip kalbos politikos objektas prūsijos Karalystėje: xviii a. pradžios diskursas.” Archivum Lithuanicum 24: 57–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banfi, Emanuele. 2009. “Lingue a rischio di estinzione.” In XXI secolo. Comunicare e rappresentare, a cura di Tullio Gregory, vol. III, 347–359. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana fondata da Giovanni Treccani. 〈[URL]〉
Berend, Nora. 2015. “L’espansione nell’Est e nel Nord Europa.” In Storia del cristianesimo, a cura di Marina Benedetti, vol. II [L’età medievale (secoli VIII-XV)], 265–287. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christiansen, Eric. 1980. The Northern Crusades. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citavičiūtė, Liucija. 2004. Karaliaučiaus universiteto lietuvių kalbos seminaras. Istorija ir reikšmė lietuvių kultūrai. Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 2008. Jono Šulco ezopo pasakėčios. Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalby, Andrew. 2003. Language in Danger: The Loss of Linguistic Diversity and the Threat to Our Future. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dini, Pietro U. 2001. “Die sprachliche Lage in den baltischen Städten: Riga, Vilnius und Königsberg.” Res Balticae 7: 205–209.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Foundations of Baltic Languages. Vilnius: Eugrimas. 〈[URL]〉
2018. L’anello baltico. Lituania, Lettonia, Estonia: un profilo storico-culturale. Viterbo: Vocifuoriscena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023. Foundations of Old Prussian: Philology and Linguistics. Lanham / Boulder / New York / London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drotvinas, Vincentas (ed.) 2008. Michaelio Mörlino traktatas Principium primarium in lingva Lithvanica. Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gineitis, Leonas. 1998. Kristijono Donelaičio aplinka [Senoji Lietuvos literatūra, 9]. Vilnius: Lietuvių literatūros ir tautosakos institutas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 2000. Halte à la mort des langues. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, K. David. 2007. When Langues Die. The Extinction of the World’s Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juška, Albertas. 1994. “Reformacija — esminis faktorius, saugojęs lietuvybę Mažojoje Lietuvoje.” In Protestantizmas Lietuvoje: istorija ir dabartis, 28–34. Vilnius: Apyaušris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1800. “Nachscrift eines Freundes.” In Christian G. Mielcke Littauisch-deutsches und Deutsch-littauisches Wörterbuch, s.n.p. Königsberg: Hartung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korsakas, Kostas (ed.) 1970. Lietuvininkai. Apie vakarų Lietuvą ir jos gyventojus devynioliktame amžiuje. Vilnius: Vaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koženiauskienė, Regina. 1990. XVI–XVII amžiaus prakalbos ir dedikacijos. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuolys, Darius. 2013. “L’epos di Kristijonas Donelaitis.” In Quaderni del Premio Letterario Giuseppe Acerbi: letteratura lituana, a cura di Simona Cappellari e Giorgio Colombo, 59–64. Mantova: Gilgamesh edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepner, Theodor. 1744. Der Preuſche Littauer oder Vorſtellung der Nahmens-Herleitung […]. Danʒig: Joh. Heinrich Rüdigern. 〈[URL]〉
Murray, Alan V. (ed.) 2001. Crusade and Conversion on the Baltic Frontier 1150–1500. Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel and Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palionis, Jonas. 1995. Lietuvių kalbos rašomosios kalbos istorija. II pataisytas ir papildytas leidimas. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piročkinas, Arnoldas. 1994. “Mažosios Lietuvos lietuvių raštijos kūrėjai tautinės savimonės požiūriu (Nuo M. Mažvydo iki K. Donelaičio).” In Protestantizmas Lietuvoje: istorija ir dabartis, 18–27. Vilnius: Apyaušris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pupkis, Aldons. 1984. “Prie lietuvių kalbos kultūros teorijos ištakų.” Mūsų kalba 3: 14–19. [reprinted in Lietuvių kalbos normintojai ir puoselėtojai, 2010, 11–17. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogge, Adolf. 1881. “Heinrich Lysius in Litauen und Masuren.” Altpreußische Monatsschrift 18: 116–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinkevičius, Zigmas. 1984–1995. Lietuvių kalbos istorija (7 voll.) Vilnius: Vaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “Lithuanian in East Prussia.” Linguistica Baltica 1: 63–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. The History of the Lithuanian Language. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue