In:The Grammar of Interaction: Epistemicity, information management and discourse in language use
Edited by Susana Rodríguez Rosique and Jordi M. Antolí Martínez
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 46] 2025
► pp. 38–74
Get fulltext
The Spanish Epistemic Dative Construction
A modal-evidential stance expression
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 17 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.46.02del
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.46.02del
Abstract
The Epistemic Dative Construction is the non-causative modal variant of the Possessive Dative
Construction. In the intra-clausal Possessor-Possessee relation, the Dative Clitic designates the Possessor, as
Co-Dative compatible with all the other Dative functions. With transitive predicates, the Clitic (N2)
functions as reference point for the Direct Object (N1), conceived as Possessee. The latter denotes the
property or quality which, from the perspective of the conceptualizing Subject (N0) — the evidential source
—, stands out in the Dative participant’s domain (N2), treated as object of thought. The verbal predicate
specifies the modal-evidential nature of the appraisal. The judgment’s relative reliability further hinges on the
Subject’s commitment and diagnostic competence, the tangibility or verifiability of the N1 entity, the
expectation patterns associated with the Dative participant’s profile, and other modal markers.
Keywords: Spanish, epistemic dative, stance, evidentiality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The Possessive Dative
- 2.1External possessor construction
- 2.2The Possessive: A co-dative
- 2.3The standard syntactic-semantic configuration
- 2.4Possession: An open experiential Gestalt
- 3.The Epistemic Possessive Dative
- 3.1External Possessor Construction sui generis
- 3.2Epistemic modality meets evidentiality
- 3.3Nominal versus sentential complementation
- 3.4Varying degrees of subjectivity
- 3.4.1Sensory registration
- 3.4.2Extrasensory perception
- 3.4.3Dialogic engagement
- 3.4.4Imaginary representation
- 3.4.5Overt stance taking
- 4.Conclusion
Notes List of abbreviations used References
References (41)
Bally, Charles. 1926. “L’expression
des idées de sphère personnelle et de solidarité dans les langues
indo-européennes.” In Festschrift Louis
Gauchat, F. Fankhauser and J. Jakob (eds.), 68–78. Sauerländer: Arau.
. [1926]
1996. “The expression of concepts of the personal domain and indivisibility in
Indo-European languages.” Translated by Christine Beal and Hilary Chappell. In The
Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part/Whole
Relation, H. Chappell and W. B. McGregor (eds.), 31–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bosque, Ignacio (dir.) 2004. REDES.
Diccionario combinatorio del español
contemporáneo. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic
meaning. A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter.
. 2018. “Evidentiality.
The notion and the term.” In The Oxford handbook of
evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 261–272, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bres, Jacques and Mellet, Sylvie. 2009. “Une
approche dialogique des faits grammaticaux.” Langue
Française 163: 3–20.
Bres, Jacques, Nowakowska, Aleksandra and Sarale, Jean-Marc. 2019. Petite
grammaire alphabétique du
dialogisme. París: Classiques Garnier.
Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William B. (eds.). 1996. The
Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part/Whole
Relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cifuentes Honrubia, José Luis. 2015. Construcciones
posesivas en español. Leiden / Boston: Brill / Rodopi.
Cornillie, Bert and Pietrandrea, Paola. 2012. “Modality
at work. Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal
markers.” Journal of
Pragmatics 44 (15): 2109–2115.
Cornillie, Bert, Marín Arrese, Juana Isabel and Wiemer, Björn. 2018. “La
gramática, la semántica y la pragmática de la evidencialidad. Apuntes teóricos y
metodológicos.” In Gramática, semántica y pragmática
de la evidencialidad, B. Cornillie and D. Izquierdo Alegría (eds.), 15–36, Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.
Delbecque, Nicole and Lamiroy, Béatrice. 1996. “Towards
a typology of the Spanish dative.” In The Dative.
Vol.1. Descriptive Studies, W. Van Belle and W. Van Langendonck (eds.), 73–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dendale, Patrick and Tasmowski, Liliane. 2001. “Introduction:
evidentiality and related notions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 33 (3): 339–348.
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1999. “Los
dativos.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua
española, vol.2, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (dirs.), 1855–1930, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession.
Cognitive sources, forces and
grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Izquierdo Alegría, Dámaso and González Ruiz, Ramón. 2016. “Un
acercamiento a los fundamentos de la evidencialidad y a su recepción y tratamiento en la lingüística
hispánica.” In La evidencialidad en español: teoría y
descripción, R. González Ruiz, D. Izquierdo Alegría and Ó. Loureda Lamas (eds.), 9–45. Madrid / Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana / Vervuert.
Izquierdo Alegría, Dámaso. 2019. “¿Qué
tipo de información codifica realmente un evidencial? Propuesta de una distinción conceptual entre fuente,
base y modo de acceso para el reconocimiento de unidades
evidenciales.” Estudios
Filológicos 63: 211–236.
Kliffer, Michael D. 1987. “Los sustantivos
intrínsecamente relacionales: un examen multi-nivelístico.” Revista Española de
Lingüística, 17 (2): 283–300.
König, Ekkehard and Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. “Les
constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues
d’Europe.” In Actance et Valence dans les Langues
d’Europe, J. Feuillet (ed.), 525–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lamiroy, Béatrice and Delbecque, Nicole. 1998. “The
possessive dative in Romance and Germanic
languages.” In The Dative. Vol. 2. Theoretical and
Constrastive Studies, W. Van Langendonck and W. Van Belle (eds.), 29–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1995. “Possession and
possessive constructions.” In Language and the
Cognitive Construal of the World, J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (eds.), 52–79. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
1999. “Reference point
constructions.” In Grammar and
Conceptualization, R. W. Langacker, 171–202. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Maldonado, R. 1998. “Datividad
y distancia conceptual.” In Estudios de Lingüística
Cognitiva II, J. L. Cifuentes Honrubia (ed.), Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, 687–706.
Maldonado, Ricardo. 1999. A
media voz. Problemas conceptuales del clítico
Se. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Miller, George A. and Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1976. Language and
perception. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic
modality, language, and
conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Picallo, M. Carme and Rigau, Gemma. 1999. “El
posesivo y las relaciones posesivas.” In Gramática
descriptiva de la lengua española, vol.1, I. Bosque and V. Demonte (dirs.), 973–1023. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Real Academia Española (RAE): Corpus de
Referencia del Español Actual (CREA). Online: [URL]. [consulted
between December 2023 and October
2024]
Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua
Española. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española
(NGLE). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1982. “Le
‘datif épistémique’ en français et la Condition d’Opacité de
Chomsky.” In Grammaire des insultes et autres
études, N. Ruwet. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 172–204.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English
Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sketch Engine. Spanish Web
corpus. 2018. (esTenTen18). Online :
Sketch Engine: [URL]. [consulted between December 2023 and October 2024]
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward
a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring
Systems. Cambridge, MIT Press.
