In:La integración de la pronunciación en el aula de ELE: Integrating pronunciation in the Spanish language classroom
Editado por Zsuzsanna Bárkányi, M. Mar Galindo Merino y Aarón Pérez-Bernabeu
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 42] 2024
► pp. 72–87
Chapter 5De la comprensión auditiva a la pronunciación
Article language: Spanish
Published online: 28 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.42.05mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.42.05mar
Resumen
En este capítulo nos ocupamos tanto del papel de la enseñanza / aprendizaje de la pronunciación a
partir de la comprensión auditiva como de la percepción multimodal. Tras el esbozo de unas bases conceptuales sobre la
comprensión auditiva y el procesamiento del habla, presentamos brevemente los principales modelos teóricos y los cinco
principios de investigación basada en la evidencia que, en nuestra opinión, sustentan un buen diseño curricular de la
pronunciación. Finalizamos con una propuesta práctica, ejemplificada en los contrastes de las consonantes líquidas en
español, que parte de la percepción: actividades contextualizadas, rentables, significativas y lúdicas, en progresión
de lo simple a lo complejo, de lo general a lo particular, teniendo en cuenta el carácter multimodal del habla y su
dimensión corporeizada.
Extended abstract
From listening to pronunciation
In this chapter we will analyze the relationship between listening comprehension and
pronunciation. Following the general structure of the volume, we will begin by presenting some basic concepts in this
area, such as the tasks and phases in oral speech processing, and in relation to previous research on integrated
pronunciation instruction. As for the theoretical basis, some well-known psycholinguistic models will be considered,
such as the Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM; Best, 1995; Best, McRoberts & Goodell, 2001), Speech Learning Model (SLM; Flege, 1995), or the Second Language Linguistic Perception Model (L2LP; Escudero, 2005; van Leussen &
Escudero, 2015), which have in common the premise that perception precedes production, both in mother
tongue and second language development, and that improving the former leads to significant progress in the latter, as
has been empirically demonstrated by several studies (Escudero, 2005; Baese-Berk and Samuel, 2016; Baese-Berk,
2019). Throughout the chapter we will discuss the five principles of evidence-based research that underpin
good pronunciation curriculum design (Colantoni, Escudero, Marrero-Aguiar &
Steele, 2021): (1) the desirability of focusing instruction on perception, for the reasons mentioned
before; (2) the relevance of prosody, as opposed to focusing on segments alone, linked with other levels of the
language; (3) the need to use contextualized stimuli, authentic input, natural speech in environments similar to those
found outside the classroom, but progressing from the simple to the complex; (4) the selection of elements (sounds,
accent, intonation) with high functional load, prioritizing the most frequent contrasts in Spanish, those with more
minimal pairs and more morphophonological repercussions; and, finally, 5) the concept of Spanish as the language of
many millions of speakers with different varieties, all of them on an equal footing, so that we advocate selecting
realizations shared by most of our speech, from a pan-Hispanic perspective. In the last section a specific proposal
has been presented that exemplifies the implementation of the above premises, taking into account the multidimensional
character of the language and its embodied dimension.
Article outline
- 1.Introducción
- 2.Contextualización de la relación entre la comprensión auditiva y la pronunciación
- 2.1De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de comprensión auditiva. El procesamiento del habla: Etapas y tareas
- 2.2Percepción y pronunciación. La lengua materna como filtro: La sordera fonológica
- 2.3La comprensión auditiva. La pronunciación y los niveles de análisis del lenguaje: Relaciones y diferencias
- 3.Contribuciones de la investigación actual a la relación entre comprensión auditiva y pronunciación
- 4.Buenas prácticas en la integración de la pronunciación
- 4.1Selección de materiales
- 4.2Progresión
- 4.3Multimodalidad: La comprensión auditiva también es visual
- 4.4Líquidas fluidas con Rosalía y Raw Alejandro
- 5.Conclusiones y líneas de investigación para el futuro
Nota Referencias bibliográficas
References (48)
Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions
between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic
categories. Attention, Perception, &
Psychophysics, 81, 981–1005.
Baese-Berk, M. M. y Samuel, A. G. (2016). Listeners
beware: Speech production may be bad for learning speech sounds. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 89, 23–36.
Baker, W., y Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual
paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual
differences. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 44, 165–181.
Best, C. T. (1995). Learning
to perceive the sound pattern of English. En C. Rovee-Collier y L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances
in infancy research, vol.
9 (pp. 217–304). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. y Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination
of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological
system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 109(2), 775–794.
Casado, M. [directora
y presentadora] (2022, 31 de
marzo). Las tres puertas [Entrevista de
televisión]. Accesible en [URL]
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. y Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching
pronunciation hardback with audio CDs (2): A course book and reference
guide. Cambridge University Press.
Charles, T., Trenkic, D., Gambier, Y., Caimi, A. y Mariotti, C. (2015). Speech
segmentation in a second language: The role of bimodal
input (pp. 173–198). En Y. Gambier, A. Caimi y C. Mariotti (Eds.) Subtitles
and language learning: Principles, strategies and practical
experiences, (pp. 173–198). Peter Lang.
Colantoni, L. y Steele, J. (2008). Integrating
articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological
acquisition. Applied
psycholinguistics, 29(3), 489–534.
Colantoni, L., Escudero, P., Marrero-Aguiar, V. y Steele, J. (2021). Evidence-based
design principles for Spanish pronunciation teaching. Frontiers in
Communication, 6, 639889.
Dahl, T. I., y Ludvigsen, S. (2014). How
I see what you’re saying: The role of gestures in native and foreign language listening
comprehension. The Modern Language
Journal, 98(3), 813–833.
Derwing, T. M. y Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation
fundamentals: evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic
Perception and Second Language Acquisition: Explaining the Attainment of Optimal Phonological
Categorization. [Tesis doctoral]. LOT Dissertation
Series 113, Utrecht University.
Firth, S. (1992). Pronunciation
syllabus design: A question of focus. En P. Avery y S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Teaching
American English
pronunciation (pp. 173–183). Oxford University Press
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second
language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and
linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language
research, 92, 233–277.
Flege, J. E., Aoyama, K. y Bohn, O. S. (2021). The
revised speech learning model (SLM-r). En Wayland, R. (Ed). Second
language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical
progress, (pp. 84–118), Cambridge University Press.
Foote, J. A. y Trofimovich, P. (2017). Second
language pronunciation learning: An overview of theoretical
perspectives. En Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., y Murphy, J. M. (Eds.) The
Routledge handbook of contemporary English
pronunciation, (pp. 75–90). Routledge.
Guberina, P. (1965). La
méthode audio-visuelle structuro-globale. Revue de Phonétique
Appliquée, 1, pp. 35–64.
Jiménez Calderón, F. y A. Rufat Sánchez (Eds.) (2019). Manual
de formación para profesores de
ELE. SGEL.
Kim, Y. S. G. y Pilcher, H. (2016). What
is listening comprehension and what does it take to improve listening
comprehension? En R. Schiff y M. Joshi (eds.), Handbook
of interventions in learning
disabilities, (pp. 159–173). Springer.
Kissling, E. M. (2015). Phonetics
instruction improves learners’ perception of L2 sounds. Language teaching
research, 19(3), 254–275.
Levis, J. M. (2017). Evidence-based
pronunciation teaching: A pedagogy for the future. Journal of Second Language
Pronunciation, 3(1), 1–8.
Levis, J. M., Derwing, T. M. y Sonsaat-Hegelheimer, S. (eds.) (2022). Second
language pronunciation: Bridging the gap between research and teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Llanos, I. (2023, 20 de
marzo). Charlando con Rosalía y Rauw Alejandro [Archivo de
vídeo] [URL]
Llisterri, J. (1995). Relationships
between Speech Production and Speech Perception in a Second
Language- En Elenius, K. y Branderud, P. (Eds.) Proceedings
of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm, Sweden, 13–19 August,
1995. Vol. 4 (pp. 92–99). Stockholm: KTH / Stockholm University
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E. y Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training
Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal
of the Acoustical Society of
America, 89(2), 874–886.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second
language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Marrero Aguiar, V. (2001). Fonética
perceptiva. Addenda. Material complementario de la asignatura Fonética y Fonología de la lengua
española. Madrid, UNED.
Martín Leralta, S. (2009). Competencia
estratégica para la comprensión auditiva en español como lengua extranjera, ASELE
Colección Monografías (12). Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
Padilla García, X. (2015). La
pronunciación del español. Fonética y enseñanza de lenguas. Universidad de Alicante.
Pérez Bernabeu, A. (2019). Comprensión
auditiva y percepción multimodal: una nueva mirada a la comprensión de la oralidad desde la coherencia al
paradigma comunicativo de enseñanza de idiomas. Doblele. Revista de lengua y
literatura, 5, 47–65.
Polivanov, E. (1931). La
perception des sons d’une langue étrangere. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de
Prague, 4, 79–96.
Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening
comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL
Quarterly 17(2), 219–240.
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage
Factors Affecting Undergraduate’s Judgments of Nonnative English-Speaking Teaching
Assistants. Research in Higher
Education, 33(4), 511–531.
Saito, K., Hanzawa, K., Petrova, K., Kachlicka, M., Suzukida, Y. y Tierney, A. (2022). Incidental
and multimodal high variability phonetic training: Potential, limits, and future
directions. Language
Learning, 72(4), 1049–1091.
Strange, W. (2011). Automatic
selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: a working
model. Journal of
Phonetics 39, 456–466.
Strange, W.; Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech
perception and second language learners: the re-education of selective
perception. En Hansen E. y Zampini, Phonology and
second language
acquisition (pp. 159–198). John Benjamins.
Sueyoshi, A. y Hardison, D. M. (2005). The
role of gestures and facial cues in second-language listening
comprehension. Language
Learning, 55(4), 661–699.
Tanner, M. (2020). Back
to the future of pronunciation teaching: Putting the zoom back into the ‘zoom
principle.’ In O. Kang, S. Staples, K. Yaw y K. Hirschi (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 11th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching
conference, 341–352. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Thomson, R. I. (2018). High
variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT) A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner
ought to know. Journal of Second Language
Pronunciation, 4(2), 208–231.
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie, Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 7. Trad. español: Principios de fonología. Cincel, 1973.
