Cover not available

In:From Verbal Periphrases to Complex Predicates
Edited by Mar Garachana Camarero, Sandra Montserrat Buendia and Claus Dieter Pusch
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 31] 2022
► pp. 149–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Anteriors and resultatives in Old Spanish

ORCiD logo with link | Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg | Freie Universität Berlin
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.31.08ros
Abstract
This paper proposes a quantitative analysis of the opposition between the Old Spanish intransitive constructions aver (‘have’) + participle and ser (‘be’) + participle. It is misleading to characterise this opposition as auxiliary selection in a strict sense because aver and ser are not allomorphs. Whereas aver + PtcP is used as an anterior, ser + PtcP often receives a resultative interpretation. For this reason, the two constructions display distributional differences. In particular, the use of ser + PtcP is disfavoured in contexts that also disfavour a resultative interpretation: sentences involving bounded temporal adverbials or stative locative adverbials, as well as sentences involving irrealis modality. The use of multivariate statistical methodology demonstrates the significance of these constraints. In addition, it suggests a difference in the use of the two constructions with reflexive morphology that illuminates their different historical origin, and likewise, their difference in function.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The envelope of variation of A and S
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Multivariate analysis
    • 4.1Measurements
      • time
      • auxiliated verbs
      • reflexivity
      • subject referentiality
      • adverbial modification
      • auxiliary morphology
      • modality
      • persistence
    • 4.2Model selection and description of results
      • time
      • auxiliated verbs
      • reflexivity
      • subject referentiality
      • adverbial modification
      • auxiliary morphology
      • modality
      • persistence
    • 4.3Discussion of results
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Aarts, Bas. 2004. Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28. 1–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 1998. The loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. In: Historical Linguistics 1997. Selected Papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997, Schmid, Monika S., Jennifer R. Austin, and Dieter Stein (eds.), 77–100. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance. In: Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: the Rosendal Papers, Eythórsson, Thórhallur (ed.), 115–142. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythorsson, and Jóhanna Barðdal. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4): 677–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberenz, Rolf. 1991. Castellano antiguo y español moderno: reflexiones sobre la periodización en la historia de la lengua. Revista de filología española 71, 79–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés. 2006. La Historiografía medieval como fuente de datos lingüísticos. Tradiciones consolidadas y rupturas necesarias. In: Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, Bustos Tovar, José Jesus, and José Luis Girón Alchonchel (eds.), 11, 1779–1807. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, Daniel. 1994. Die Auxiliarisierung von habere. Freiburg i. Br.: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. Habilitation thesis.
Kühner, Raphael, and Carl Stegmann. 1962. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Band 1: Satzlehre. München: Hüber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1987. Estudios lingüísticos, literarios y estilísticos. Valencia: Servicio de Publicación Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Legendre, Geraldine, and Antonella Sorace. 2003. Auxiliaires et intransivité en français et dans les langues romanes. In: Les langues romanes: problèmes de la phrase simple, Godard, Danièle (ed.), 185–233. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre (Lateinische Grammatik von Leumann-Hofmann-Szantyr, Erster Band). München: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Ian. 2006. Unaccusative Verbs in Romance Languages. Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas, and Artemis Alexiadou. 2010. Perfects, resultatives and auxiliaries in Early English. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 389–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 2008. The English Resultative perfect and its relationship to the Experiential perfect and the simple past tense. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 323–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., and Sergej Jaxontov. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In: Typology of Resultative Constructions, Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Kelvin M. 1977. La versión de Alfonso XI del Roman de Troie. Ms. H-j-6 del Escorial. Illinois: Applied Literature Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Jose, Douglas Bates, Saikat DebRoy, Deepayan Sarkar, and the R Development Core Team. 2009. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 1985. Copulas, verbs of possession and auxiliaries in Old Spanish: the evidence for structurally interdependent changes. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 62(4): 337–355.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at <[URL]>. Last access 26 December 2015.
Rodríguez Molina, Javier. 2006. Ser + participio en español antiguo: perífrasis resultativa, no tiempo compuesto. In: Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, Bustos Tovar, José Jesus, and José Luis Girón Alchonchel (eds.), II, 1059–1072. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2012. How to measure replacement: auxiliary selection in Old Spanish bibles. Folia Linguistica Historica 33(1): 135–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, and Pierrette Thibault. 1977. L’alternance entre les auxiliaires avoir et être en français parlé à Montréal. Langue française 34(1): 81–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, Judith D., and John B. Willett. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis. Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolova, Natalya I. 2006. Split intransitivity in Old Spanish: irreals and negation factors. Revue roumaine de linguistique LI(2): 301–320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English. A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yllera, Alicia. 1980. Sintaxis histórica del verbo español: Las perífrasis medievales. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow. 2004. Animacy encoding in English: why and how. In: DiscAnnotation ‘04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Webber, Bonnie, and Donna Byron (eds.), 118–125. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpora used
Admyte. 1992. Archivo digital de manuscritos y textos españoles. Tomo 0. Madrid: Micronet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2014. Banco de datos (CORDE) [en línea]. Corpus diacrónico del español. Available online at <[URL]>. Last access 20 April 2012.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kapkan, Danguolė Kotryna
2025. BE-perfects and grammaticalization in Bulgarian and Lithuanian. Studies in Language DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue