Cover not available

In:Computational Phraseology
Edited by Gloria Corpas Pastor and Jean-Pierre Colson
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 24] 2020
► pp. 247–272

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Too big to fail but big enough to pay for their mistakes

A collostructional analysis of the patterns [too ADJ to V] and [ADJ enough to V]

 | Freie Universität Berlin |
 | Université de Neuchâtel |
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.24.13ste
Abstract
In this paper, we illustrate the usefulness of the family of methods collectively known as Collostructional Analysis for phraseological research. Investigating two patterns, [too ADJ to V] and [ADJ enough to V], we show how a technique originally developed for the investigation of words and constructions can be fruitfully applied to issues pertinent to phraseology, such as the co-existence of compositional and idiomatic semantics and the analysis of semantically complementary patterns more generally. To this end, we use the three conventional methods (Simple, Distinctive and Co-varying Collexeme Analyses) and propose a novel extension (Distinctive Co-varying Collexeme Analysis) particularly suitable for the investigation of complementary patterns. We show that collostructional analysis is suitable for confirming hypotheses derived from qualitative analyses, as well as uncovering subtle differences that are otherwise inaccessible for non-empirical research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Descriptive background
    • 2.2Methodological background
  • 3.Case studies
    • 3.1Data: Source, extraction, cleaning
    • 3.2Case study: Simple collexeme analysis (SCA)
    • 3.3Case study: Distinctive collexeme analysis (DCA)
    • 3.4Case study: Co-varying collexeme analysis (CCA)
    • 3.5Case study: Distinctive co-varying collexeme analysis (DCCA)
  • 4.Summary
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Church, K. W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Exploiting on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evert, S. (2004). The statistics of word cooccurrences. Word pairs and collocations. (PhD Thesis, Universität Stuttgart). [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010a). Corpus Encoding Tutorial. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010b). CQP query language tutorial (CWB Version 3.0). [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flach, S. (2016). Collostructions: An R implementation for the family of collostructional methods. Version 0.0.7. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Let’s go look at usage: A constructional approach to formal constraints on go-VERB. In T. Herbst, & P. Uhrig (Eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (Volume 3) (pp. 231–252). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Funke, S. (2007). The cfa Package. Version 0.9–3. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004a). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus- based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). Covarying collexemes in the into-causative. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 225–236). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements. In D. Glynn, & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (Human Cognitive Processing, vol. 43) (pp. 391–404). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, K. E. (2014a). Too female to be ruthless and too pregnant to argue: Semantic conflict and resolution in the [too ADJ to V]-construction. Suvremena Lingvistika, 40(77), 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014b). This construction is too hot to handle: A corpus study of an adjectival construction. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association (pp. 740–748). Kyoto: Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Adjectives and usage-patterns in the [X enough to VERB]-construction. International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-13). Northumbria University, Newcastle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, M. (2009). No detail too small. Language Log. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, C. (2003). The meaning of too, enough, and so… that. Natural Language Semantics, 11(1), 69–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedersen, T. (1996). Fishing for exactness. In Proceedings of the South-Central SAS Users Group Conference (pp. 188–200). Austin, TX: South-Central SAS Users Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F. (2012). Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) (pp. 486–493). Istanbul: ELRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2011). Cognitive linguistics meets the corpus. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries, & M. Ž. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (Human Cognitive Processing, vol. 32) (pp. 257–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Collostructional analysis. In T. Hoffmann, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction Grammar (pp. 290–306). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Flach, S. (2016). The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. (Language and the Human Lifespan). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Channel and constructional meaning: A collostructional case study. In G. Kristiansen, & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 129–152). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Corpora and grammar. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, Vol II (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 29) (pp. 933–952). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wason, P. C., & Reich, S. S. (1979). A verbal illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(4), 591–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Daugs, Robert & Ulrike Schneider
2025. Negate me not, negate me never: cross-varietal distributional skews in modal negation from a diachronic perspective. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff
2025. Introduction to the special issue on collostructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21:3 ► pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard & Stefan Th. Gries
2025. GO (a)round and V vs. GO (a)round Ving . Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Kara, Elif
2024. What Depression Feels Like: A Collostructional Analysis of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 72:3 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Zehentner, Eva
2024.  Alternations (at) that time: NP versus PP time adjuncts in the history of English. Linguistics Vanguard 10:s1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Na & Fuyin Li
2023. Mandarin Analytic Causative Constructions with Shǐ and Ràng: A Usage-Based Collostructional Analysis. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13495], ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Daugs, Robert
2022. English modal enclitic constructions: a diachronic, usage-based study of’dand’ll. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2020. Paradigmatic pattern analysis. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 8:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue