Cover not available

In:Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 215–233

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Teasing in casual conversations

An opportunistic discursive strategy

 | Aix-Marseille Université, Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix en Provence, France
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.11pri
Abstract
In order to study teasing in casual conversations, I will focus the present work on a specific humorous device that frequently occurs in casual conversations: “linguistic pinning” (Traverso, 1999) described as a verbatim repetition of a word or expression said by the hearer to create humor. Teasing, as many other forms of conversational humor in a broad sense, is thus seen as a rebound on, at least, the prior turn. Consequently, the humorous speaker will be depicted as both a participant able to adapt her/himself to the context (discursive and more generally, relational) and an opportunist, watching out for the possibility of producing humor.
After a description of the forms and function of linguistic pinning and after a comparison to other related phenomena (repetition and punning), I will analyze seven examples of pinning to show its discursive functioning and some reactions it triggers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Teasing and teasing in casual conversations
  • 3.Linguistic pinning as a specific teasing device
    • 3.1Formal and functional characteristics of linguistic pinning
    • 3.2Pinning and repetitions
    • 3.3Pinning and punning
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Analysis of the data
    • 5.1Pinning revealing a linguistic inappropriateness (real or considered as such)
    • 5.2Pinning revealing a second meaning
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (26)
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1953. “The Position of Humor in Human Communication.” Cybernetics, New York, Josiah Macy, JR. Fundation : 1–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana and Florencia Cortés-Conde. 1997. “From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display.” Journal of Pragmatics 27: 275–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1987. “Po-faced receipts of teases.” Linguistics 25: 219–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. “No Aggression, Only Teasing: The Pragmatics of teasing and Banter.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (2): 241–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Anchors Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golopentja, Sanda. 1988. « Interaction et histoire conversationnelles. » In Echanges sur la conversation, ed. by Cosnier, Gelas and Kerbrat-Orecchioni. Paris. Editions du CNRS, 69–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guardiola, Mathilde, Roxane Bertrand, Sylvie Bruxelles, Carole Etienne, Emilie Jouin-Chardon, Florence Oloff, Béatrice Priego-Valverde, and Véronique Traverso. 2012. “Other-repetition: displaying others’ lexical choices as commentable.” Oral presentation, ISICS: International Symposium on Imitation and Convergence in Speech September, 3-5: Aix en Provence.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face”, Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2106–2119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Humour, face and (im)politeness in guetting acquainted.” In Situated Politeness. Ed. by B. Davies, M. Haugh and A. Merrison. London. Continuum: 165–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Jocular Mockery as Interactional Practice in Everyday Anglo-Australian Conversation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 34–1: 76–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1099–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee. Clevedon. Multilingual Matters, 152–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann M. Kring, Randall C. Young and Erin Heerey. 2001. “Just teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 217 (2): 229–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Martin D. and Susan M. Ervin-Tripp. 2006. “Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational Joking. Bloomington. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments : some features of preferred/dispreferred turns shape”. In Structure of Social Action, ed. by Atkinson and Heritage. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice. 2003. L’humour dans la conversation familière: description et analyse linguistiques. Paris. L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “How funny it is when everybody gets going! A case of co-construction of humor in conversation.” In Circulo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación (CLAC), [URL]
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1940. “On joking relationships.” Africa 13: 133–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1973. “On some puns with some intimations.” In Report of the twenty-third annual roundtable meeting in linguistics and language studies, ed. by R. W. Shuy, 135–144. Washington DC. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2001. “Getting Serious: Joke -> serious ‘no’.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1947–1955. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking voices. Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traverso, Véronique 1999. L’analyse des conversations. Paris. Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane. 2001. “Les enjeux de l’analyse conversationnelle ou les enjeux de la conversation.” Revue québéquoise de Linguistique 30: 177–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sheikhan, Amir & Michael Haugh
2023. Epistemics and conversational humour in intercultural first conversations. In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 335], ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Amoyal, Mary, Roxane Bertrand, Brigitte Bigi, Auriane Boudin, Christine Meunier, Berthille Pallaud, Béatrice Priego-Valverde, Stéphane Rauzy & Marion Tellier
2022. Principes et outils pour l’annotation des corpus. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :38 DOI logo
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice, Noël Nguyen & Roxane Bertrand
2022. Alignement, affiliation et trajectoire interactionnelle dans la conversation. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :38 DOI logo
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2022. Teasing. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Priego-Valverde, Béatrice
2021. Failed humor in conversation: disalignment and (dis)affiliation as a type of interactional failure. HUMOR 34:4 ► pp. 613 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue