Cover not available

In:Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 193–214

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Variability, adaptability and negotiability in conversational humor

A matter of gender

 | University of Alicante, GRIALE Research Group
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.10alv
Abstract
The present study has as its aim to analyze conversational utterances containing humor produced by men and women from the pragmatic perspective of Verschueren (2002), ultimately seeking to check whether discrepancies exist between the respective strategies that they use. In most cases, the interlocutors utilize different linguistic procedures to adapt their utterance –or not– to the humorous mode, by means of various conversational strategies that will depend both on gender and on the contextual situation. It all is determined by the nature of the corpus gathered as well as by the concepts of variability, adaptability and negotiability described by Verschueren (1999, 2002). Briz and the Val.Es.Co. Group’s Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales [Corpus of Colloquial Conversations], which is currently going through a digitization process, was used to achieve our aims. The analysis showed us that, when humor appears, each gender’s identity is defined through different strategies and procedures to adapt to the context.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The phases and linguistic elements of humor in conversation
  • 3.Variability, negotiability and adaptability: conversational strategies in humorous utterances
  • 4.Gender identity: men and women in conversation
  • 5.Humorous analysis of the conversation of men and women
    • 5.1Linguistic procedures and data
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Corpus:
Briz, Antonio & Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002 (digital). Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bibliography:
Alvarado, M. Belén. 2006. “Las marcas de la ironía.” In Interlingüística, 16. Online.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Ironía y cortesía.” In En Ruiz Gurillo L. & X. Padilla (eds.). Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. 333–345. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Las fórmulas rutinarias del español: teoría y aplicaciones. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Una propuesta de estudio para el humor en la conversación coloquial.” ELUA, 26, pp. 7–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Failed humor in conversational utterances in Spanish: a matter of (im)politeness.” In Ruiz Gurillo, L. & Alvarado Ortega, B.: Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Humor y género: Análisis de conversaciones entre mujeres.” Feminismos, 24, pp. 17–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Independencia y fórmulas rutinarias: reestructuración de la Esfera III.” RESLA. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28:1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2001a. Humorous Texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin. Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001b. “Humor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of detection.” In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri & G. Riva (eds.): Say not to say: new perspectives on miscommunication. 166–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “A primer for the linguistics of humor.” In Raskin, V. (ed.): The primer of humor research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” In HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research, 4. 293–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy. 2009a. “Responses to failed humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Impolite responses to failed humor.” In Humor in interaction, Neal Norrick and Chiaro (eds.), 143–163. Amsterdan/Philadelphia. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1978, 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Oxford. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coser, Rose (1960): “Laughter among colleagues: A study of the social functions of humor among the staff of a mental hospital.” Psychiatry 23: 83–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Attardo, Salvatore and Boxer, Diana. 2006. “Reactions to irony in discourse: evidence fo the least disruption principle.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1239–1256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2000. “Functions of humor in the conversation of men and women.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 32. 709–742. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “The pragmatics of humor support.” Humor 14–1: 55–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2006. “Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the work-place.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 38: 26–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra. 2002. “Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 1683–1710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origins. London. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. “Gender and joking: on the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 32: 55–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Responding to irony in different contexts: on cognition in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1387–1411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Gender and humor: The state of the art.” In Journal of Pragmatics, 38. 4–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. “The social stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores.” In Coupland & Jaworski (eds.) 1997. Sociolinguistics : A reader and Coursebook. New York. Martin’s Press. 168–178.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s place. New York : Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sarah. 2005. “Gender and impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 263–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2003. “Issues in conversational joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1333–1359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 2012. La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & Xose Padilla (eds.). 2009. Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & M. Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.) 2013: Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santaemilia, José. 2002. “Towards a pragmatics of gendered conversation: a few general considerations.” In Quaderns de Filología, vol. VII, pp. 93–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suderland, Jane & Lia Litosseliti (eds.) 2002: Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdan. John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “(Im)Politeness, face an perceptions of rapport: un packaging their bases an interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London, Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Para entender la pragmática. Madrid, Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Cestero Mancera, Ana María
2024. Humor en interacción: Patrones sociopragmáticos en el habla de Madrid. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante :41 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2023. Humor negotiation in interactional sequences in Spanish. In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 335], ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor
2024. Mock impoliteness in Spanish: evidence from the VALESCO.HUMOR corpus. HUMOR 37:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Timofeeva-Timofeev, Larissa & Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
2021. Marcas e indicadores humorísticos en las narraciones escritas de niños y niñas de 8, 10 y 12 años en español. Spanish in Context 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor & Esther Linares-Bernabéu
2020. Subversive humor in Spanish stand-up comedy. HUMOR 33:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue