Cover not available

In:Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 107–125

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Lawyers, great lawyers, and liars

The metapragmatics of lying in lawyer jokes

 | University of Alicante
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.06cam
Abstract
This chapter analyses the pragmatic structure of lawyer jokes, specifically those based on explicit references to lawyers’ inclination towards lying and their ability thereto. Lying has been extensively studied as an indication that the Cooperative Principle has not been followed; however, the explicit reference to lying as a practice found in lawyer jokes has not received much attention. From a sample of lawyer jokes collected from various online sources, the metapragmatic mechanisms of non-truthful statements and lying are described from a double point of view: the social implication of lawyers as liars and a Gricean analysis of lawyers not following cooperative principles in communication. The analysis demonstrates how these can lead to humorous reactions, but also, to the construction and acceptance of a cultural stereotype that represents a given profession as a dishonest one. This study shows that lying is indeed a source of humorous effects, and that such results are not hampered by the explicit reference to lying. This seems to favor a new approach to the analysis of jokes whose success may be based on their explicitness, but also on a clear metapragmatic awareness.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: lawyers as the target of humor
  • 2.Lawyer jokes and the language of humor
  • 3.Lies and humor
  • 4.Our analysis: let sleeping lawyers lie
    • 4.1Explicit lying: labelling
    • 4.2Lying and the maxim of quantity
    • 4.3Lying and the maxim of quality
    • 4.4Lying and the maxim of manner
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Works cited
  • Appendix
References (40)
Works cited
Primary Sources
http://jokes.cc.com/funny-lawyer-jokes/
http://www.bullyonline.org/successunlimited/humour/lawyer.htm
http://www.extremelysmart.com/humor/lawyerjokes.php
http://www.iciclesoftware.com/LawJokes/IcicleLawJokes.html
http://www.jokes4us.com/peoplejokes/lawyerjokes/lawyeronelinerjokes.html
http://www.languageandlaw.org/JOKES.HTM
http://www.swapmeetdave.com/Humor/Lawyer.htm
http://www.tensionnot.com/jokes/lawyer_jokes/
Secondary Sources
Attardo, Salvatore, 1993. “Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 537–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin/New York: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2001. Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton deGruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2007. Humour in the English Language. London/Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camden, Carl, Michael T. Motley & Ann Wilson. 1984. “White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 48 (4) : 309–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carson, Thomas L. 2010. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramton, Roger C. 1996. “What do Lawyer Jokes Tell us about Lawyers and Lawyering.” Cornell Law Forum 23: 3–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fallis, Don. 2008. What is lying? Paper presented at the 2008 Pacific Division Meeting of the American Philosophical Association at Pasadena, California. Available at [URL].
Galanter, Marc. 1992. “Law Abounding: Legalisation Around the North Atlantic.” The Modern Law Review, 55 (1): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “The Faces of Mistrust: The Image of Lawyers in Public Opinion, Jokes and Political Discourse.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 66: 805-845.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The great American lawyer joke explosion.” Humor 21 (4): 387–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancher, Michael. 1980. “How to play games with words: Speech-act jokes.” Journal of Literary Semantics 9 (1): 20–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobden, Karen L. and James M. Olson. 1994. “From Jest to Antipathy: Disparagement Humor as a Source of Dissonance-Motivated Attitude Change.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 15 (3): 239–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. 2007. “‘So your story now is that …’: Metapragmatic framing strategies in courtroom interrogation.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler, 223–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kane, Thomas R., Jerry Suls and James T. Tedeschi. 1977. “Humour as a Tool of Social Interaction.” In It’s a Funny Thing, Humour, ed. by Antony J. Chapman and Hugh C. Foot, 13–16. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maio, Gregory R., James M. Olson and Jacqueline E. Bush. 1997. “Telling Jokes that Disparage Social Groups: Effects on the Jokes Teller’s Stereotypes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27 (22): 1986–2000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. “Lying and falsely implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overton, Thomas W. 1995. “Lawyers, Light Bulbs, and Dead Snakes: The Lawyer Joke as Societal Text. “ UCLA Law Review, 42: 1069-1114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minkoff, David. 2013. Ultimate Book of Jewish Jokes. Pavillion Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. 1987. “On the Popular Images of the Lawyer: Reflections in a Dark Glass.” California Law Review, 75 (1): 379–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Puma, Cris. 1994. “The Missing Link: Does Lawyer-Bashing Warrant Additional Protection for Lawyers?.” Journal of the Legal Profession, 19: 207–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1998. “The sense of humor and the truth.” In The Sense of Humor. Exploration of a Personality Characteristic, ed. by Willibald Ruch, 95–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres, Vicki. 1993. “Chief of Bar Assn. Asks End to Lawyer-Bashing.” Los Angeles Times, July 6, 1993 ([URL]).
Yamaguchi, Haruhiko. 1988. “How to pull strings with words: deceptive violations in the garden-path joke.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 323–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2003. “Humor and the search for relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1295–1331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “A relevance-theoretic classification of jokes.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 131–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Analyzing jokes with the Intersecting Circles Model of humorous communication. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 9 (1): 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf. 1983. “Disparagement Humor.” In Handbook of Humor Research, Volume 1, ed. by Paul E. McGhee and Jeffrey H. Goldstein,. 85–107. New York-Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue