In:Metapragmatics of Humor: Current research trends
Edited by Leonor Ruiz-Gurillo
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 14] 2016
► pp. 57–77
Beyond verbal incongruity
A genre-specific model for the interpretation of humor in political cartoons
Published online: 24 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.04gue
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.14.04gue
Abstract
The General Theory of Verbal Humor (Attardo and Raskin 1991) opened the path to study the mechanisms of humor. Research on the comprehension and production of cartoons has traditionally adopted cognitive-semantic theories to explain how readers interpret their humorous messages. While perfectly applicable, these theories focus on the linguistic components of cartoons, analyzing exclusively the text in their speech balloons or captions with little to no attention paid to what the visual components add to their meaning. This paper analyzes the nature of cartoons as narrative monomodal or multimodal ensembles and revisits previous approaches with the goal of proposing a new genre-specific model for the understanding of their humorous messages.
Keywords: Humor, political cartoons, multimodality, social semiotics.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Definition of the genre
- 3.Linguistic approaches to humor
- 3.1Semantic-cognitive theories
- 3.2Cognitive theories
- 4.A genre-specific perspective
- 5.Analysis
- 6.Conclusions
Notes References
References (45)
Agüero Guerra, Marta. 2013a. “Análisis semántico-cognitivo del discurso humorístico en el texto multimodal de las viñetas de Forges.” ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante 27: 7–30.
. 2013b. “Multimodal Literacy and Humor Perception in Spanish Editorial Cartoons.” Thesis (M.Ed.), Carthage College.
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347.
Barrero, Manuel. 2012. “De la viñeta a la novela gráfica. Un modelo para la comprensión de la historieta.” In Narrativa gráfica. Los entresijos de la historieta, ed. by Ana M. Peppino Barale, 29–60. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Brône, Geert, and Kurt Feyaerts. 2003. The Cognitive Linguistics of Incongruity Resolution: Marked Reference-Point Structures in Humor. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño. July 20-25. Accessed June 30, 2015. [URL]
Carrier, David. 2009. “Caricature.” In A Comics Studies Reader, ed. by Jeet Heer, and Kent Worcester, 105–115. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Cohn, Neil. 2013. The Visual Language of Comics. Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Coulson, Seanna. 2002. “What’s So Funny?: Conceptual Integration in Humorous Examples.” Accessed June 30, 2015. [URL]
Coulson, Seana, and Todd Oakley. 2005. “Blending and Coded Meaning: Literal and Figurative Meaning in Cognitive Semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (10): 1510–1536.
Economou, Dorothy. 2009. “Photos in the News: Appraisal Analysis of Visual Semiosis and Verbal-Visual Intersemiosis.” PhD diss., University of Sydney. Accessed June 30, 2015. [URL]
El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2003. “Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of Newspaper Cartoons.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 75–96.
. 2011. “The Pragmatics of Humor Reception: Young People’s Responses to a Newspaper Cartoon.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 24 (1): 87–108.
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 1998. “Conceptual Integration Networks.” Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133–187.
Forceville, Charles. 1994. “Pictorial Metaphor in Advertisements.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (1): 1–29.
. 2005. “Addressing an Audience: Time, Place, and Genre in Peter van Straaten’s Calendar Cartoons.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18 (3): 247–78.
. 2006. “Non-verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, ed by Gitte Kristiansen, Michael Achard, Rene Dirven, and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza, 379–402. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hempelmann, Christian F., and Willibald Ruch. 2005. “3 WD Meets GTVH: Breaking the Ground for Interdisciplinary Humor Research.” Humor: International Journal Of Humor Research 18 (4): 353–387.
Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006 [1996]. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2003. “Humor as Ideological Struggle. The View from Cognitive Linguistics.” Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Logroño. July 20-25. Accessed June 30, 2015. [URL]
Martin, Jim, and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway. 2005. “A System for Image-Text Relations in New (and Old) Media.” Visual Communication 4 (3): 337–371.
O’Halloran, Kay L. 2008. Mathematical Discourse Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.
Paolillo, John C. 1998. “Gary Larson’s Far Side: Nonsense? Nonsense!” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 11 (3): 261–290.
Peñalba García, Mercedes. 2014. “La temporalidad en el cómic.” Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica 23: 687–713.
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Synthese Language Library. vol. 24. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub.
Samson, Andrea C. 2008. “Cognitive and Neural Humor Processing: The Influence of Structural Stimulus Property and Theory of Mind.” PhD diss., University of Fribourg. Accessed June 30, 2015. [URL]
Schank, Roger C., and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Serafini, Frank. 2011. “Expanding Perspectives for Comprehending Visual Images in Multimodal Texts.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 54 (5): 342–350.
. 2014. Reading the Visual: An Introduction to Teaching Multimodal Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Dunbar, Robin I. M. & Emma Stirling-Middleton
Pavlina, Svetlana Yu.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
