In:Constructing Languages: Norms, myths and emotions
Edited by Francesc Feliu and Josep M. Nadal
[IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature 13] 2016
► pp. 199–214
Language myths and the historiography of French
Published online: 25 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.13.12lod
https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.13.12lod
Sociolinguists in the UK have recently come to recognise the importance of language mythologies (shared assumptions about language whose factual status is not established, but which are widely prevalent and support and reinforce each other), for they can be shown to have a significant effect on the way speakers use their language on a day-to-day basis. Richard Watts has recently explored the effect of such myths, not on ordinary speakers but on writers of histories of English. He has shown that certain fundamental language myths have hardened into ideology and have had a profound effect on the historiography of English. This paper looks at the historiography of French from a similar perspective and shows how profoundly language myths via standard ideology have shaped the way histories of French have traditionally been written. Although the overt effects of this ideology have weakened in recent decades, contemporary histories of the language still show the effects of this ideology in their treatment of the vernacular and in their underlying approach to language change.
References (34)
Aiol = Normand, Jacques, and Gaston Raynaud (eds.). 2012. Aiol: Chanson de geste (Éd. 1877). Paris: Société des Anciens Textes Français.
Berschin, Helmut, Josef Felixberger, Hans Gœbl. 2008. Französische Sprachgeschichte (Überarbeitete Aufgabe), Hildesheim: Olms.
Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne Marie. 2002. “L’imaginaire linguistique: un niveau d’analyse et un point de vue théorique”. In L’Imaginaire linguistique, Anne Marie Houdebine-Gravaud (ed.), 9–21. Paris: L’Harmattan (Langue & Parole).
Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation”. In Regimes of language: ideologies, polities and identities. Paul V.Kroskrity (ed.), 35–83. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Koch, Peter, and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von prachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte”. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36: 15–43.
Lodge, R. Anthony. 2013. “La frontière oc/oil en Auvergne au Moyen âge: fiction idéologique?” In Romania. Réalité(s) et concepts. Anne-Marie Chabrolle-Cerretini (éd.), 21–35. Paris: Lambert-Lucas.
Milroy, James. 2003. “On the discourse of historical linguistics: language-internal explanation and language ideologies”. Forum for Modern Language Studies 39: 357–370.
. 2007. “The ideology of the standard language”. In The Routledge Companion to Socviolinguistics, C. Llamas, L. Mullany, & P. Stockwell (eds.), 133–139. London / New York: Routledge.
Rey, Alain, Fréderic Duval, and Gilles Siouffi. 2007. Mille Ans de la langue française. Paris: Perrin.
Romaine, Suzanne, and Euen Reid. 1976. “Glottal sloppiness? A sociolinguistic view of urban speech in Scotland”. Teaching English 9 (3): 12–18.
Straka, Georges. 1952. “La prononciation parisienne. Ses différents aspects”. Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Strasbourg 30: 212–225.
Watts, Richard J. 2000. “Mythical strands in the ideology of prescriptivism”. In The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800, L. Wright (ed.), 29–48. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2012. “Language myths”. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, J.M. Hernández-Campoy and J.C. Conde-silvestre (eds.), 586–606. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marin I. Herzog. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Jansen, Silke, Sonja Higuera del Moral, Jessica Stefanie Barzen, Pia Reimann & Markus Opolka
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
