Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Revisiting the effects of phonological short-term memory on second language vocabulary acquisition
A meta-analysis
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Tohoku University.
Published online: 20 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25009.kur
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25009.kur
Abstract
The present study provided the first meta-analysis of the relationship between phonological short-term memory
(PSTM) and auditory L2 vocabulary acquisition while incorporating important moderator variables (e.g., age) and recent scholarly
interests (e.g., vocabulary learning context). Results based on 52 effect sizes from 18 studies revealed a small-to-medium effect
of PSTM (r = .31). PSTM test type was identified as a significant moderator, indicating that PSTM assessed
through nonword/word repetition tasks shows a stronger association than digit span tasks. Vocabulary learning context approached
statistical significance, suggesting that PSTM may exert a greater influence in intentional vocabulary learning settings compared
to incidental, contextual learning ones. These findings reinforce the role of PSTM in L2 vocabulary development and highlight its
relevance for L2 teaching practices.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Phonological short-term memory: The overview and its relationship with vocabulary learning
- The role of PSTM in L2 vocabulary acquisition
- Factors modulating the relationship between PSTM and L2 vocabulary acquisition
- PSTM-related variables
- PSTM test type
- Learner Age and L2 proficiency
- Vocabulary-related variables
- Vocabulary learning context
- Vocabulary form learning modality
- Vocabulary test type
- The study
- Method
- Literature search
- Selection criteria
- Coding
- Analysis
- Results
- Summary effect size
- Moderator analysis
- Discussion
- The association strength between PSTM and L2 vocabulary learning (RQ1)
- Potential moderators of the PSTM-vocabulary correlation
- PSTM-related variables (RQ2)
- Vocabulary-related variables (RQ3)
- Considerations into PSTM test type
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Declaration of AI Use
- Note
References
References (78)
References marked with an asterisk (*) are studies included in the meta-analysis.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human
memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence, Psychology of learning
and
motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 89–195). Elsevier.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working
memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 4(3), 281–288.
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The
phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological
Review, 105(1), 158–173.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working
memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Psychology
of learning and
motivation (Vol. 81, pp. 47–89). Elsevier.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2019). The
phonological loop as a buffer store: An
update. Cortex, 1121, 91–106.
Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When
long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and
Language, 27(5), 586–595.
*Bisson, M.-J., Kukona, A., & Lengeris, A. (2021). An
ear and eye for language: Mechanisms underlying second language word learning. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 24(3), 549–568.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction
to meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Bowey, J. A. (1996). On
the association between phonological memory and receptive vocabulary in five-year-olds. Journal
of Experimental Child
Psychology, 63(1), 44–78.
*Chapuis, N. D., & Berthele, R. (2024). Teaching
methods emphasizing phonological forms enhance L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching
Research, Online First.
*Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What
makes students click: Working memory and look-up
behavior. System, 32(4), 481–503.
Coady, J. A., & Evans, J. L. (2008). Uses
and interpretations of non-word repetition tasks in children with and without specific language impairments
(SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication
Disorders, 43(1), 1–40.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working
memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 12(5), 769–786.
*Degani, T., & Goldberg, M. (2019). How
individual differences affect learning of translation-ambiguous vocabulary. Language
Learning, 69(3), 600–651.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias
in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical
test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
*Elias, M., & Degani, T. (2022). Cross-language
interactions during novel word learning: The contribution of form similarity and participant
characteristics. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 25(4), 548–565.
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective
attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing,
blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied
Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194.
Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is
nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the
nonwords. Memory &
Cognition, 23(1), 83–94.
(2006). Nonword
repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513–543.
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation
of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal
study. Journal of Memory and
Language, 28(2), 200–213.
(1990). Phonological
memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection?. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 29(3), 336–360.
*Hu, C. (2003). Phonological
memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language
Learning, 53(3), 429–462.
*Hu, C.-F. (2017). Resolving
referential ambiguity across ambiguous situations in young foreign language learners. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 633–656.
(2024). Resolving
referential ambiguity for nouns and verbs across situations by foreign language
learners. English Teaching &
Learning, 48(1), 23–47.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental
and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
handbook of second language acquisition (1st
ed., pp. 349–381). Wiley.
*Hummel, K. M. (2021). Phonological
memory and L2 vocabulary learning in a narrated story task. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 50(3), 603–622.
In’nami, Y., Hijikata, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2021). Working
memory capacity and L2 reading: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 44(2), 381–406.
*Jiang, M., Zou, D., Lee, L.-K., Wang, F. L., & Wu, N.-I. (2023). The
cognitive process with intensive and rapid vocabulary acquisition tasks using multimedia
glosses. The Journal of
AsiaTEFL, 20(1), 64–88.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects
of working memory in L2 learning. Language
Teaching, 44(2), 137–166.
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological
short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language
learning. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 11(2), 261–271.
Kurokawa, S., Hein, A. M., & Uchihara, T. (2025). Incidental
vocabulary acquisition through captioned viewing: A meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 75(4), 939–987.
Li, S. (2022). Working
memory and second language learning. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (1st
ed., pp. 348–360). Routledge.
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working
memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin
&
Review, 21(4), 861–883.
Lindstromberg, S. (2020). Intentional
L2 vocabulary learning. In S. Webb (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of vocabulary
studies (pp. 240–254). Routledge.
Makita, K., Yamazaki, M., Tanabe, H. C., Koike, T., Kochiyama, T., Yokokawa, H., Yoshida, H., & Sadato, N. (2013). A
functional magnetic resonance imaging study of foreign-language vocabulary learning enhanced by phonological rehearsal: The
role of the right cerebellum and left fusiform gyrus. Mind, Brain, and
Education, 7(4), 213–224.
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental
vocabulary learning in SLA: Effects of frequency, aural enhancement, and working
memory. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 40(3), 651–675.
*Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Jelec, A., Janiszewska, D., Rataj, K., & Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (2018). Different
phonological mechanisms facilitate vocabulary learning at early and late stages of language acquisition: Evidence from Polish
9-year-olds learning English. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 1–35.
*Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The
roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary
learning. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413.
*Martinez, D., & Singleton, J. L. (2019). Individual
differences in lexical learning across two language modalities: Sign learning, word learning, and their relationship in
hearing non-signing adults. Acta
Psychologica, 1981, 102892.
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). Contrasting
contributions of phonological short-term memory and long-term knowledge to vocabulary learning in a foreign
language. Memory, 13(3–4), 422–429.
Montero Perez, M. (2020). Incidental
vocabulary learning through viewing video: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working
memory. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 42(4), 749–773.
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological
memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 29(4), 557–581.
Olsthoorn, N. M., Andringa, S., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2014). Visual
and auditory digit-span performance in native and non-native speakers. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 18(6), 663–673.
Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (2009). A
model linking immediate serial recall, the Hebb repetition effect and the learning of phonological word
forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences, 364(1536), 3737–3753.
Papagno, C. (2022). The
phonological loop as a “Language Learning Device”: An
update. In J. W. Schwieter & Z. (Edward) Wen (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (1st
ed., pp. 51–72). Cambridge University Press.
Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological
short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and
Language, 30(3), 331–347.
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1992). Phonological
short-term memory and the learning of novel words: The effect of phonological similarity and item
length. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section
A, 44(1), 47–67.
Peters, E. (2020). Factors
affecting the learning of single-word items. In S. Webb (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of vocabulary
studies (pp. 125–142). Routledge.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How
big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language
Learning, 64(4), 878–912.
(2015). Meta-analyzing
second language research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing
quantitative methods in second language
research (pp. 106–128). Routledge.
R Core Team (2024). R: A language and
environment for statistical computing (Version 4.4.1) [Computer
software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rosenthal, E., Riccio, C., Gsanger, K., & Jarratt, K. (2006). Digit
Span components as predictors of attention problems and executive functioning in
children. Archives of Clinical
Neuropsychology, 21(2), 131–139.
Service, E. (1992). Phonology,
working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Section
A, 45(1), 21–50.
(2012). Working
memory in second language acquisition: Phonological
short-term. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied linguistics (1st
ed.). Wiley.
*Service, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (1993). Differences
between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and
Language, 32(5), 608–623.
Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is
the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary
acquisition? Applied
Psycholinguistics, 16(2), 155–172.
Service, E., & Simard, D. (2022). How
Measures of Working Memory Relate to L2 Vocabulary. In J. W. Schwieter & Z. (Edward) Wen (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (1st
ed., pp. 529–549). Cambridge University Press.
Shin, J., & Hu, Y. (2022). A
methodological synthesis of working memory tasks in L2
research. In J. W. Schwieter & Z. (Edward) Wen (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (1st
ed., pp. 722–746). Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive
psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as
significant. Psychological
Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve:
A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 143(2), 534–547.
*Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological
sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary
acquisition. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 293–321.
*Teng, M. F. (2023). Effectiveness
of captioned videos for incidental vocabulary learning and retention: The role of working
memory. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 38(1–2), 206–234.
(2024). Young
beginning learners’ vocabulary learning via input and output tasks: The role of working
memory. Studies in Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 14(4), 731–767.
Teng, M. F., & Uchihara, T. (2024). Factors
affecting incidental vocabulary learning. In M. F. Teng & B. L. Reynolds (Eds.), Researching
incidental vocabulary learning in a second
language (pp. 131–148). Routledge.
*Teng, M. F., & Zhang, D. (2023). The
associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary
learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 61(3), 1021–1049.
Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2002). Language
familiarity effects in short-term memory: The role of output delay and long-term knowledge. The
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section
A, 55(4), 1363–1383.
Vallar, G., & Baddeley, A. (1987). Phonological
short-term store and sentence processing. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 4(4), 417–438.
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting
meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical
Software, 36(3), 1–48.
Webb, S., Uchihara, T., & Yanagisawa, A. (2023). How
effective is second language incidental vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis. Language
Teaching, 56(2), 161–180.
Wen, Z. E., & Jackson, D. O. (2022). Working
memory. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual
differences (pp. 54–66). Routledge.
Wen, Z. E., Juffs, A., & Winke, P. (2020). Measuring
working memory. In P. Winke & T. Brunfaut (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language
testing (pp. 167–176). Routledge.
Wen, Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.). (2015). Working
memory in second language acquisition and processing. Multilingual Matters.
*Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological
memory and rule learning. Language
Learning, 53(1), 67–121.