Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 176:1 (2025) ► pp.44–75

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The role of working memory and attention control in incidental L2 vocabulary learning from reading-while-listening

ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
ORCiD logo with link | Yonsei University
Published online: 14 February 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.24001.jun
Abstract
This study investigated the role of working memory and attention control in incidental L2 vocabulary learning from engaging in reading-while-listening. Fifty-nine Cantonese ESL learners engaged in reading-while-listening to two English stories in which twelve adjective-pseudonoun collocations appeared three times in meaningful contexts. Immediately after the reading-while-listening task and again one week later, participants completed unannounced posttests that measured their receptive and productive knowledge about the pseudonouns and their collocations. Their working memory was assessed with an automated operation span task, and attention control ability was measured with three squared tasks that consisted of Stroop, Flanker, and Simon squared tasks. The results indicated that attention control played a significant role in remembering the target pseudonoun forms and their collocational features for both recall and recognition. The working memory, by contrast, did not emerge as a determinant factor. The implications of the findings were discussed in the context of L2 vocabulary learning.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • L2 vocabulary learning from reading-while-listening
    • The role of working memory in incidental L2 vocabulary learning
    • Attention control as a potential individual difference factor
  • The current study
  • Methodology
    • Design
    • Participants
    • The target collocations and measurement tools
    • Reading-while-listening task
    • Working memory capacity and attention control tasks
      • Operation span task (Ospan)
      • Three squared tasks (ThreeSquared)
      • Stroop squared task (Stroop)
      • Flanker squared task (Flanker)
      • Simon squared task (Simon)
    • Procedure
  • Analysis
  • Results
    • The role of working memory and attention control in incidental vocabulary learning from reading-while-listening
    • The role of working memory and attention control in incidental collocation learning from reading-while-listening
  • Discussion
    • The role of working memory and attention control in incidental vocabulary learning from reading-while-listening
    • The role of working memory and attention control in incidental collocation learning from reading-while-listening
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (100)
References
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 235–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(24), 13468–13472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2000). The effects of sentence writing as semantic elaboration on the allocation of processing resources and second language lexical acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–90). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological review, 105(1), 158–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323–363.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0–5. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisson, M., Heuven, W. J., Conklin, K., & Tunney, R. J. (2014). The role of repeated exposure to multimodal input in incidental acquisition of foreign language vocabulary. Language Learning, 64(4), 855–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2013). Memory-based aptitude for nativelike selection: The role of phonological short-term memory. In M. Long, & G. Granena (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 203–228). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136–163.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., & Engle, R. W. (2020). Attention Control: A Cornerstone of Higher-Order Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6), 624–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2021). Reducing adverse impact in high-stakes testing. Intelligence, 871, 101561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Mashburn, C. A., Tsukahara, J. S., & Engle, R. W. (2022). Attention control and process overlap theory: Searching for cognitive processes underpinning the positive manifold. Intelligence, 911, 101629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgoyne, A. P., Tsukahara, J. S., Mashburn, C. A., Pak, R., & Engle, R. W. (2023). Nature and measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(8), 2369–2402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, R., Lo, B. C. Y., & Allen, N. B. (2008). The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional control, cognitive style, and affect. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32(3), 303–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2021). Comparing incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and reading-while-listening. System, 971, 102442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than Nonformulaic language by native and Nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 72–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research, 36(3), 257–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunnings, I., & Sturt, P. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. Journal of Memory and Language, 751, 117–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth & Patricia A. Carpenter. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 191. 450–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Draheim, C., Pak, R., Draheim, A. A., & Engle, R. W. (2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(4), 1143–1197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2021). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 242–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P. M. J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second-language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 974–986. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 145–199). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farshi, N., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). Effects of differences in language aptitude on learning grammatical collocations under elaborated input conditions. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 476–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2020). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing: Which mode of input is most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 421, 499–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six- and seven-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 377–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2010). Working memory and reactivity. Language Learning, 601, 712–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrell, F. E., & Dupont, C. (2015). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 3.17–0. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 141, 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Indrarathne, B., & Kormos, J. (2018). The role of working memory in processing L2 input: Insights from eye-tracking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 211, 355–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jean, M., & Geva, E. (2009). The development of vocabulary in English as a second language children and its role in predicting word recognition ability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(1), 153–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, J., & Lee, M. (2023). Incidental collocational learning from reading-while-listening and the impact of synchronized textual enhancement. IRAL — International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, J., & Zhang, W. (2024). The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: An extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023). IRAL — International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, J., Stainer, M. J., & Tran, M. H. (2022). The impact of textual enhancement and frequency manipulation on incidental learning of collocations from reading. Language Teaching Research. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 981, 122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & S, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 261.271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotyusov, A. I., Kasanov, D., Kosachenko, A. I., Gashkova, A. S., Pavlov, Y. G., & Malykh, S. (2023). Working memory capacity depends on attention control, but not selective attention. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, M., & Révész, A. (2020). Promoting grammatical development through captions and textual enhancement in multimodal input-based tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 421, 625–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). The role of working memory in attentional allocation and grammatical development under textually-enhanced, unenhanced and no captioning conditions. Journal for the psychology of language learning, 3(1), 6–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57(2), 229–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(1), 185–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S. (2023). Working memory and second language learning: A critical and synthetic review. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 348–360). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit Learning in the L2 Classroom: A Student-Centered Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 651–675. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mashburn, C. A., Burgoyne, A. P., Tsukahara, J. S., Pak, R., Coyne, J. T., Sibley, C., Foroughi, C., & Engle, R. W. (2024). Knowledge, attention, and psychomotor ability: A latent variable approach to understanding individual differences in simulated work performance. Intelligence, 1041, 101835. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 302–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montero Perez, M. M. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through viewing video: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(4), 749–773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49–100. . PMID: 10945922.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 196–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Northbrook, J., Allen, D., & Conklin, K. (2022). ‘Did you see that?” — The role of repetition and enhancement on lexical bundle processing in English learning materials. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 453–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 97–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, E. (2014). The effects of repetition and time of post-test administration on EFL learners’ form recall of single words and collocations. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 75–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 113–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 164–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 888–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 621, 93–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2020). Multi- or single-word units? The role of collocation use in comprehensible and contextually appropriate second language speech. Language Learning, 70(2), 548–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A. & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N. C., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 293–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segal, D. (2023). Sustained attention plays a critical role in reading comprehension of adults with and without ADHD. Learning and Individual Differences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, D., & Nation, P. (2008). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62(4), 339–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suárez, M. D. M., Gilabert, R., & Moskvina, N. (2021). The mediating role of vocabulary size, working memory, attention and inhibition in early vocabulary learning under different TV genres: An exploratory study. TESOL Journal, 12(4), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szudarski, P. (2012). Effects of meaning- and formed-focused instruction on the acquisition of verb–noun collocations in L2 English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 11, 3–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teng, F. (2023). Effectiveness of captioned videos for incidental vocabulary learning and retention: the role of working memory, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Working memory and prior vocabulary knowledge in incidental vocabulary learning from listening, reading, reading-while-listening, and viewing captioned videos. System, 1241, 103381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teng, M. F., & Cui, Y. (2023). Comparing incidental learning of single words and collocations from different captioning conditions: The role of vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teng, F., & Zhang, D. (2021). The associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytic ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. L. & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., Saito, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2022). Does mode of input affect how second language learners create form–meaning connections and pronounce second language words? Modern Language Journal, 106(2), 351–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the Antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1302–1321.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2020). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual enhancement: Insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 53(1), 85-100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Michel, M. (2021). An exploratory study on the aspects of vocabulary knowledge addressed in EAP textbooks. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 101, 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2022a). Incidental learning of collocations from meaningful input: A longitudinal study into three reading modes and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(3), 685–707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022b). A longitudinal study on the effect of mode of reading on incidental collocation learning and predictors of learning gains. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations to text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 315–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(3), 267–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J.N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 551, 177-233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. (2022). How does mode of input affect the incidental learning of collocations? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 35–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 431, 55–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yi, W. (2018). Statistical sensitivity, cognitive aptitudes, and processing of collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 831–856. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gu, Chanyuan, Samuel A. Nastase, Zaid Zada & Ping Li
2025. Reading comprehension in L1 and L2 readers: neurocomputational mechanisms revealed through large language models. npj Science of Learning 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue