Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 174:2 (2023) ► pp.177–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Vocabulary size estimates for Lithuanian native speakers

Is it possible to talk about L1 vocabulary size cross-linguistically?

ORCiD logo with link | Vilnius University
 | Vilnius University
Published online: 14 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.22005.vil
Abstract
The vocabulary size estimates suggested for native speakers used to vary considerably. More recently, researchers using Yes/No tests reported numbers that are much closer together. This article seeks to answer the question of whether we can give an estimate of an adult native speaker’s vocabulary size without specifying a language. First, it presents the estimate for a native speaker’s vocabulary size in Lithuanian and explores its variation depending on the person’s age (ranging from 16 to 71 years old), place of residence, their reading for pleasure habits, and gender. Then it compares this estimate to the ones suggested for German, English, and Dutch native speakers. The analysis suggests that the estimates for different languages, at least the ones based on empirical data rather than statistical predictions, do not differ considerably.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Measuring vocabulary size with Yes/No tests
  • Vocabulary size estimates for different L1s
  • Individual characteristics affecting one’s vocabulary size
  • Counting units
  • The present study
  • Methodology
    • Lithuanian vocabulary size test
    • Data collection
    • Participants
    • Data analysis
  • Results and discussion
    • RQ1.What is an average vocabulary size of a Lithuanian native speaker and how does it change with age?
    • RQ2.How do other factors (gender, place of residence, reading for pleasure habits) affect the vocabulary size of the Lithuanian language?
    • RQ3.How do the results of Lithuanian vocabulary size compare to the estimates for German, Dutch, and English?
  • Limitations
  • Implications
  • Conclusions
  • References
References (49)
References
Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amenta, S., Badan, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). LexITA: A Quick and Reliable Assessment Tool for Italian L2 Receptive Vocabulary Size. Applied Linguistics, amaa020. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andriuškevičiūtė, K. & Vilkienė, L. (2019). Vocabulary size of an adult Lithuanian native speaker. Taikomoji kalbotyra, (12), 154–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andriuškevičiūtė, K., & Vilkienė, L. (2019). Suaugusio lietuvio gimtosios kalbos žodyno dydis. Taikomoji Kalbotyra, 121, 154–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeckmans, R., Eyckmans, J., Janssens, V., Dufranne, M., & Van de Velde, H. (2001). Examining the Yes/No vocabulary test: Some methodological issues in theory and practice. Language Testing, 18(3), 235–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., Mclean, S., & Stewart, J. (2020). The most appropriate lexical unit for L2 vocabulary research and pedagogy: A brief review of the evidence. Applied Linguistics, amaa061. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, D., Stewart, J., Stoeckel, T., & McLean, S. (2021). The coming paradigm shift in the use of lexical units. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 950–953. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cobb, T., & Laufer, B. (2021). The nuclear word family list: A list of the most frequent family members, including base and affixed words. Language Learning, 71(3), 834–871. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eyckmans, J., de Velde, H. V., van Hout, R., & Boers, F. (2007). Learners’ response behaviour in yes/no vocabulary tests. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller, Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 59–76). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferré, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Can Lextale-Esp discriminate between groups of highly proficient Catalan-Spanish bilinguals with different language dominances? Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 717–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goulden, R., Nation, P., & Read, J. (1990). How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 341–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27(2), 236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izura, C., Cuetos, F., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Lextale-Esp: A test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary size. Psicológica, 351, 49–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1665–1692. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kompiuterinės Lingvistikos Centras. (2011). Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos tekstynas. VDU. [URL]
Kremmel, B. (2016). Word families and frequency bands in vocabulary tests: Challenging conventions. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 976–987. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Selling the (word) family silver?: A response to Webb’s “Lemma Dilemma”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 962–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2021). Lemmas, flemmas, word families, and common sense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 965–968. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science, 11(3), F9–F16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marjanovič-Umek, L., Fekonja-Peklaj, U., & Sočan, G. (2017). Early vocabulary, parental education, and the frequency of shared reading as predictors of toddler’s vocabulary and grammar at age 2;7: A Slovenian longitudinal CDI study*. Journal of Child Language, 44(2), 457–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. ERIC Clearinghouse. [URL]
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miškinytė, R. & Vilkienė, L. (2020). The size of the native Lithuanian vocabulary of the 11th grade students. Pedagogika, 138(2), 61–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Coxhead, A. (2021). Measuring native-speaker vocabulary size. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Thoughts on word families. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 969–972. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pancsofar, N., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2006). Mother and father language input to young children: Contributions to later language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 571–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulson, J. F., Dauber, S., & Leiferman, J. A. (2006). Individual and Combined Effects of Postpartum Depression in Mothers and Fathers on Parenting Behavior. Pediatrics, 118(2), 659–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paulson, J. F., Keefe, H. A., & Leiferman, J. A. (2009). Early parental depression and child language development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(3), 254–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Scoring Yes-No vocabulary tests: Reaction time vs. nonword approaches. Language Testing, 29(4), 489–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Richman, W. A., & Colombo, J. (2007). Joint book reading in the second year and vocabulary outcomes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(3), 242–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 913–951. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segbers, J., & Schroeder, S. (2017). How many words do children know? A corpus-based estimation of children’s total vocabulary size. Language Testing, 34(3), 0265532216641152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaisėtaitė, E. (2020). Irish Lithuanian L1: Vocabulary size and signs of its attrition. Taikomoji Kalbotyra, 141, 116–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L., & Schmitt, N. (2019). Frequency as a Guide for Vocabulary Usefulness. The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, 811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkienė, L., Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L. & Bružaitė-Liseckienė, J. (2019). The Lithuanian Language at the Lithuanian, Polish, and Russian Gymnasiums in Vilnius: Language Competence, Attitudes, and Motivation. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vilkienė, L., Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, L., & Bružaitė-Liseckienė, J. (2019). Lietuvių kalba Vilniaus lietuviškose, lenkiškose ir rusiškose gimnazijose: Mokėjimo kokybė, kalbinės nuostatos ir motyvacija. Vilniaus Universiteto Leidykla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waring, R., & Nation, I. S. P. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy, Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2021). The lemma dilemma: How should words be operationalized in research and pedagogy? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 941–949. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vilkaitė-Lozdienė, Laura
2025. Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue