Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 172:1 (2021) ► pp.26–57

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Articles

The impact of explicit instruction on different types of linguistic properties

Syntactic vs. syntax-discourse properties

ORCiD logo with link | CLUNL - Linguistic Research Centre of Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Published online: 29 October 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.18022.tei
Abstract
Over the past decades, L2 research has shown that properties involving the syntax-discourse interface are typically more complex to acquire than strictly syntactic properties. To determine whether the complexity of the target property moderates the effectiveness of explicit instruction, this study investigates the impact of explicit instruction on the development of a syntactic property (the ungrammaticality of free inversion) and a syntax-discourse property (the unacceptability of locative inversion with informationally heavy verbs) in L1 European Portuguese-L2 English (B2 and C1 levels), using a pre-test/post-test design. Results reveal that instruction only produced lasting effects when it targeted syntax and learners were at the C1 level. These results indicate that syntax may be more permeable to instructional effects than the syntax-discourse interface and that the effectiveness of explicit instruction depends on learners’ stage of L2 development.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Target structures
    • 2.1Subject-verb inversion in English and EP
    • 2.2Subject-verb inversion in L2 English
  • 3.The present study
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Timetable and research design
    • 3.4Teaching materials
    • 3.5Tests
    • 3.6Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1SV/VS orders
    • 4.2LI
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (59)
References
Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 9–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bader, M., & Häussler, J. (2010). Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 273–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, B. (1996). The discourse function of inversion in English. New York / London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1994). Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language, 70(1), 72–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). Subject positions and interfaces. The case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Winkler, S. (2008). English focus inversion. Journal of Linguistics, 44(03), 625–658. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Graaff, R. (1997). The experanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 249–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–755). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2002a). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 14–34). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Philp, J., Reinders, H., & Erlam, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53(3), 497–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holler, S., & Hartmann, J. (2012). Locative inversion in English: Implications of a rating study. In S. Featherston & B. Stolterfoht (Eds.), Empirical approaches to linguistic theory: Studies in meaning and structure (pp. 241–265). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2007). Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. (PhD thesis), University of Groningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., Pierrard, M., & Van Daele, S. (2005). Rule complexity and the effectiveness of explicit grammar instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 207–241). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 111, 97–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, T., Montrul, S., & Santos, H. (2011). An experimental investigation of the expression of genericity in English, Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua, 121(5), 963–985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J.-E., & Nam, H. (2016). Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 431–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago / London: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linck, J., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 651, 185–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano, C., & Mendikoetxea, A. (2010). Interface conditions on postverbal subjects: A corpus study of L2 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(04), 475–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaro, E., & Masterman, L. (2006). Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 297–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, A. (2006). Some notes on the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties of locative inversion in English. In M. Carretero, L. H. Downing, J. Lavid, E. M. Caro, S. P. D. Ayala, & E. Sánchez-Pardo (Eds.), A Pleasure of Life in Words. A Festschrift for Angela Downing. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereira, C. (1998). Inversão locativa em português. (MA dissertation), Universidade do Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentza, A., & Tsimpli, I. (2013). The interpretability of features in second language acquisition: Evidence from null and postverbal subjects in L2 English. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 131, 323–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 27–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2010). Theoretical linguistics meets pedagogical practice: Pronominal subject use in Spanish as a second language. Hispania, 93(1), 52–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R. (2017). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. (pp. 3–32). Cambridge / New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. (2010). ‘Free’ inversion in Romance and the null subject parameter. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 231–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2002). The compounding parameter in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 507–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2006). Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In G. Fanselow, C. Fery, M. Schlesewsky, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Gradience in grammars: Generative perspectives (pp. 106–123). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 669–684. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teixeira, J. (2018). L2 acquisition at the interfaces: Subject-verb inversion in L2 English and its pedagogical implications. (PhD thesis), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019a). From a Romance null subject grammar to a non-null subject grammar: The syntax of pronominal subjects in advanced and near-native English. In I. Feldhausen, M. Elsig, I. Kuchenbrandt, & M. Neuhaus (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 30, Frankfurt (pp. 256–274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019b). Is the syntax-discourse interface a locus of permanent optionality? The case of locative inversion in L2 English. In R. Slabakova, L. Corbet, L. Domínguez, A. Dudley, & A. Wallington (Eds.), Explorations in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 120–137). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, E., & McCormack, B. (2013). The syntax-discourse interface and the interface between generative theory and pedagogical approaches to SLA. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 101–114). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Rothman, J. (2015). What does current generative theory have to say about the explicit-implicit debate? In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, G., Birner, B., & Huddleston, R. (2002). Information packaging. In R. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 1363–1447). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7(2), 133–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whong, M. (2013). Applied Generative SLA: The need for an agenda and a methodology. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 231–247). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (2014). Beyond paradigm: The ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of classroom research. Second Language Research, 30(4), 551–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ayoun, Dalila
2025. The Second Language Acquisition of English Tense, Aspect and Modality, DOI logo
Jiang, Shan & Huiping Zhang
2025. The acquisition of locative inversion at the syntax-pragmatics interface by Chinese learners of English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Suga, Kiyotaka & Shawn Loewen
2023. Potential test-learning effects of an oral elicited imitation test: Methodological considerations for form-focused instruction studies. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 100035 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue