Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 167:1 (2016) ► pp.3–15
TBLT through the lens of applied linguistics
Engaging with the real world of the classroom
Published online: 29 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.01byg
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.1.01byg
Ever since the establishment in the 1940’s of the distinguished journal Language Learning, a significant proportion of research in applied linguistics has defined itself as aiming to address practical problems of language teaching. Given the definition of applied linguistics as ‘the theoretical and empirical study of real world problems in which language has a central role’ (after Brumfit, 2001), an ambition to relate its work to practical language teaching problems is appropriate. Task-based language teaching is a subarea of applied linguistics which deliberately aims to link research to practice. With this in mind, this paper will seek to evaluate the extent to which TBLT research has to date engaged with — and helped address — the real world problems of language education. It then attempts to derive some implications for future directions of TBLT research as a part of an empirical applied linguistics.
References (35)
Bygate, M. (1988). Linguistic and strategic features of the language of learners working in oral communication exercises. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London Institute of Education.
Byrnes, H., & Manchon, R. (Eds.). (2014). Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cameron, L.J., Moon, J.P., & Bygate, M. (1996). Language development in the mainstream: How do teachers and pupils use language? Language and Education, 10(4), 221–236.
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development: A study of classroom interaction and language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (Eds.). (2009). Special issue: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465.
Lambert, C. (2015). A micro-genetic study of task-induced L2 development: The emergence of complexity in L2 descriptive discourse. Paper presented at the
6th Biennial International Conference on TBLT
. Leuven, Belgium, 16–19 September 2015.
Long, M.H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 3791, 259–278.
. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4(2), 126–141.
. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Long, M., Adams, L., McLean, M., & Castanos, F. (1976). Doing things with words: Verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’76 (pp. 137–153). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55(2), 124–132.
. (2009). Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 1–13.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 221–250.
. (2001). ‘A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and research (pp. 141–162). Harlow: Longman.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (Eds.). (2013). Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker-von Ditfurth, M. (2011). Teaching English: Task-supported language learning. Paderborn: Schöningh
Robinson, P. (2015). The cognition hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and research (pp. 119–140). Harlow: Longman.
. 2015. Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 271–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tarone, E. (2015). Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925–2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 444–453.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (2015). Tasks for real! Hold on, how real is ‘real’?. Plenary presentation to the
6th Biennial International Conference on TBLT
. Leuven, Belgium, 16-19 September 2015.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Ku, Yunjung Yunie
East, Martin
2025. The teacher variable in TBLT. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 255 ff.
Bygate, Martin
Torres-Martínez, Sergio
Torres–Martínez, Sergio
Feryok, Anne
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
