Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 168:2 (2017) ► pp.183–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Procedural repetition in task-based interaction among young EFL learners

Does it make a difference?

 | Public University of Navarre
 | University of the Basque Country
Published online: 30 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16024.laz
Abstract
Interactive tasks are valuable tools for L2 learners and have long made their way into language lessons. Among the different task conditions, only few studies have dealt with procedural repetition, which consists of repeating the same task type with different contents and which is frequently used in schools. In this study we explore the effects of procedural repetition on the oral interactions of ten pairs of English learners (age 11) who had to repeat a task three times. Their negotiation strategies and general performance (accuracy, fluency and complexity) were analysed. Results show that, in the third repetition, the amount of confirmation checks and repetitions decreased significantly and accuracy timidly improved. All other aspects remained unaffected. The pedagogical implications of these results are also discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Task repetition
    • 2.2Repetition effects on interaction
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2The task
    • 4.3Procedure
    • 4.4Transcriptions
    • 4.5Data coding
      • 4.5.1Coding of NoM strategies
      • 4.5.2Coding of general competence
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Bret Blasco, A. (2014). L2 English young learners’ oral production skills in instructed second language contexts: A longitudinal study of CLIL and EFL settings. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruton, A. (2011). Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 236–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & Swain, M. (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2007). (Ed.) Investigating tasks in formal second language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 451–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System 541, 40–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 491, 549–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: a meta-analysis. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2013a). Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 3–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Effects of pretask modelling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 471, 8–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 411, 829–840. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 51, 177–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983b). Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 41, 126–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 41, 221–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). A case of exercising: effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. (2011). Interactionist approaches. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Kanganas, A. P., & Oliver, R. (2007). Task familiarity and interactional feedback in child ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 411, 285–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The relationship between conversational interaction and second language acquisition. Modern language journal, 821, 372–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patanasorn, C. (2010). Effects of procedural content and task repetition on accuracy and fluency in an EFL context. Unpublished PHD dissertation. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System, 341, 547–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1987). SLA, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 81, 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). From input, output and comprehension to negotiation, evidence and attention: An overview of theory and research on learner interaction in SLA. In M. P. García Mayo, J. Gutierrez, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 49–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). Input and interaction in the communicative language classroom: A comparison of teacher-fronted and group activities. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (115–132). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 111, 189–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: integrating theory and practice (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sample, E., & Michel, M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency in young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 3(Special Issue 8), 23–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Hanzawa, Keiko, Yuichi Suzuki, Akifumi Yanagisawa & Junya Fukuta
2026. A scoping review of oral task repetition: Evolving concepts for speaking skills development. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 100292 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar & Sima Khezrlou
2025. The role of task repetition in shaping L2 writing self-efficacy, L2 writing anxiety, and L2 written production. System 130 ► pp. 103629 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Hansol Lee
2025. Impact of task repetition schedules and emotions on L2 writing performance profiles using latent transition analysis. Assessing Writing 66 ► pp. 100974 ff. DOI logo
Aramaki, Takashi
2025. Task-supported and task-based language teaching and their effects on task motivation. The Journal of Educational Research ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & Agurtzane Azkarai
2025. Examining Young Learners’ Engagement with Language in Task-Based Interaction Across Time. In Investigating Attention to Form and Individual Differences:Research with EFL Children [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
García Mayo, María del Pilar
2025. Task-based language learning among children in an EFL context. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Guerrero-Gomez, Janire, María Orcasitas-Vicandi & Marta Kopinska
2025. Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 1421 ff. DOI logo
Aaj, Ali, Parviz Maftoon & Masood Siyyari
2024. Do young EFL learners benefit from task repetition?. The Language Learning Journal 52:6 ► pp. 650 ff. DOI logo
Dao, Phung, Suong Thi Thu Hoang & Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen
2024. Young learners’ synchronous online peer interaction: teachers’ beliefs of its benefits and implementation. Language Awareness 33:1 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Vraciu, Alexandra & Agnès Leroux
2024. The development of CAF in the oral production of French L1 young learners of EFL. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 15:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Trang Le Diem & Phung Dao
2023. Primary school children’s peer interaction: Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2023. Focus on form in task repetition through oral and written task modeling. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:2 ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & Raúl Azpilicueta-Martinez
2022. Negotiation of meaning in child-child vs. adult-adult interactions: Evidence from low proficiency EFL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 463 ff. DOI logo
Regagliolo, Alberto
2022. Oral production A2+ in Italian as foreign language: autonomy and repetition tasks. Forum Filologiczne Ateneum :1(10)2022 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo, Maria Angeles
2021. Differences in the task-supported negotiations of younger and older EFL children: From repair into prevention . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:3 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo, María Ángeles & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research 25:4 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2021. Give me a second chance. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Celaya, M. Luz
2019. The Emergence and Development of Syntactic Patterns in EFL Writing in a School Context: A Longitudinal Study. Languages 4:2 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Oliver, Rhonda & Agurtzane Azkarai
2019. Patterns of interaction and young ESL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue