Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 172:1 (2021) ► pp.121–151
Implementing Task-based language teaching in an Asian context
Is it a real possibility or a nightmare? A case study in Vietnam
Published online: 17 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16022.ngu
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16022.ngu
Abstract
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has increasingly been used in an Asian context. However, research into its
implementation in Vietnam remains scarce. This study aims to investigate the effects of a task-based intervention on learners’
performance of listening, reading, speaking and writing tasks compared to the effects of a more traditional teaching method (TTM),
which is based on form-focused instruction in combination with the Presentation-Practice-Production method. Through a
pretest-posttest design, the researcher can measure the effects of the two settings on learners’ progress. The results show that
the participants in the TBLT setting outperformed the participants in the TTM setting for speaking, listening and writing, but not
for reading. The results of this study will encourage more research in the field of TBLT implementation in Vietnam.
Keywords: Task-based language teaching, reading, writing, listening, speaking
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- Confucian Heritage Culture: Impacts on language education in Vietnam
- Traditional teaching methods versus Task-based language teaching
- Why TBLT in Vietnam?
- Present study
- Method
- Participants
- Design
- The TBLT setting
- The TTM setting
- Task types
- Tests
- Scoring
- Data collection procedures
- Data analysis
- Results
- Differences in learners’ proficiency between the TBLT settingand the TTM setting
- Differential effect of TBLT and TTM on learners’ specific language skills
- Listening
- Speaking
- Reading
- Writing
- Discussion
- Method
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
References
References (61)
Anderson, A. A. (1997). The effects of sociocognitive writing strategy instruction on the writing achievement and writing self-efficacy of students with disabilities and typical achievement in an urban elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Ballard, B. & Clanchy, J. (1984). Study abroad: A manual for Asian students. Longmans, Kuala Lumpur.
Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centered assessment in language learning: the promise and the challenge. In N. Bird, P. Falvey, A. Tsui, D. Allison & A. McNeill (Eds.), Language and learning: papers presented at the Annual International language in Education Conference (Hong Kong, 1993), 73–94. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Department.
Canh, L. (2007). A historical review of English language education in Vietnam. In Y. H. Choi & B. Spolsky (Eds.), English education in Asia: History and policies. Seoul, South Korea: Asia TEFL.
(2011). Form-focused instruction: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished PhD, The University of Waikato.
Canh, L. V., & Barnard, R. (2009). Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnam case study. Prospect, 24 (2), 20–33.
Chalmers, D. & Volet, S. (1997). Common misconception about students from South-East Asia studying in Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 161, 87–100.
Chow, A. K. W., & Mok-Cheung, A. H. M. (2004). English language teaching in Hong Kong SAR: Tradition, transition, and transformation. In H. W. Kam & R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Language policies and language education: The impact in East Asian countries in the next decade (pp. 150–177). Singapore: Times Academic Press.
Cocroft, B. A. K., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1994). Face-work in Japan and in the United States. Intercultural Journal of Intercultural Relation, 181, 469–506.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996b). English Teaching and Learning in China. Language Teaching, 29 (2), 61–80.
(2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Lournal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 221–246.
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London, England: Routledge.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 299–324.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, J. (2005). Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd edition) (New York, McGraw-Hill).
Huy Thinh, D. (2006). The role of English in Vietnam’s foreign language policy: A brief history. Paper presented at the 19th Annual EA Education Conference. [URL]
Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocation across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organization psychology. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 640–675.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Lang. Teach, 401, 243–249.
Loc, N. (2005). Tertiary education and strategies for teaching and learning foreign languages in Vietnam. Paper presented at Conference on Teaching Tertiary English and International Relations in Vietnam Universities and Colleges, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Dai hoc Su pham.
Loi, N. V. (2011). Dynamic conceptions of input, output and interaction: Vietnamese EFL lecturers learning second language acquisition theory. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: University of Waikato, New Zealand.
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hylstenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 77–79). Clevedon: Multilingual Matterns.
(1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. M. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives (pp. 115–141). New York. NY: Harper & Row.
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Maley, A. (1983). A miracle of rare device: the teaching of English in China. In: J. M. Valdes (Eds.), Culture bound: bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 102–111.
Ministry of Education and Training [MOET] (2006). Chuong trinh giao duc pho thong: Mon Tieng Anh [English curriculum for the secondary school]. Hanoi, Vietnam: Education Publishing House.
Nguyen, T. H. (2002). Vietnam: Cultural background for ESL/EFL teachers. Review of Vietnamese Studies, 2 (1), 1–6.
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. Long and C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Cambridge: Blackwell.
(2016). Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 230–244.
Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia – Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 371, 589–613.
Paltridge, B. (1992). EAP placement testing: an integrated approach. English for Specific Purposes, 111, 243–268.
Phuong-Mai, N., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2005b). Cooperative learning vs. CHC’s collectivism. The analysis in Vietnam. Paper presented at ORD conference, Gent, Belgium, 30 May-1 June.
(2006). Culturally appropriate pedagogy: the case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture context. Intercultural Education, 17 (1), 1–19.
Phuong, H. Y., Van den Branden, K., Van Steendam, E., & Sercu, L. (2015). The impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulatory writing strategies. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1661, 37–93.
Rao, Z. (1996). Reconciling communicative approaches to the teaching of English with traditional Chinese methods. Research in the Teaching of English, 301, 458–471.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. A Description and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 971, 43–54.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second languge learning. Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sato, R. (2010). Reconsidering the effectiveness and suitability of PPP and TBLT in the Japanese EFL classroom. JALT fournal, 32(2), 189–200.
Samimy, K. K., & Kobayashi, C. (2004). Toward the Development of Intercultural Communicative Competence: Theoretical and Pedagogical Implications for Japanese English Teachers. JALT Journal, 26, (2), 245–261.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Tomlinson, B., & Bao Dat. (2004). The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to EFL methodology. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 199–222.
Tsui, A. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language teaching. In: K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 145–167.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching, 238–252. New York: Routledge.
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 261, 70–89.
(2011). Second Language Listening: Presage, Process, Product and Pedagogy. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching And Learning, 455–471. New York: Routledge.
Willis, J., & Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Heinemann.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Nguyen, Nhi Tran Yen, Anh Nguyen Nhu Le & Ida Fatimawati bt Adi Badiozaman
Huynh , Truong Sang & Van Loi Nguyen
Wang, Cong, Sida Zhu & Haijing Zhang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
