Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 171:2 (2020) ► pp.280–306
Effects of rhetorical text analysis on idea generation and text quality
Published online: 15 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16013.rij
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.16013.rij
Abstract
Producing a meaningful written discourse in a foreign language requires a high cognitive effort of EFL learners.
They face challenges caused by L2 word or grammar-related difficulties, and also by the L2 genre and genre conventions that may be
quite different from what they experienced in their L1. The present study focusses on the support offered to Vietnamese L2 writers
to overcome these hindrances. An intensive four-week writing intervention was designed and tested to examine whether encouraging
genre awareness via a short session of sample text analysis could empower students to conduct effective brainstorming for
argumentative writing. In a pre-test post-test control group design with switching replications, with 66 EFL intermediate
undergraduate participants, the study obtained four indicators of L2 argumentative writing quality: idea generation, productivity,
global text quality and self-efficacy. The results showed that participants integrated the sample text analysis into the idea
generation stage. They created significantly longer self-expressive free writing texts, perceived the generated ideas as more
useful, and used more of these ideas in their argumentative texts composition, compared to students from the control condition
(with teacher instruction only). No treatment effects were found for productivity, global quality of final text, and
self-efficacy. Students in both control and treatment conditions generally showed a significant improvement on these
variables.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Genre pedagogy, idea generation practice and research in an EFL setting
- Free writing as an idea generation activity in the EFL classroom
- The present study
- Method
- Participants
- Intervention
- Measures
- Procedure
- Analyses
- Results
- Generation of ideas
- Productivity and quality of final text
- Self-efficacy
- Discussion and conclusion
References
References (52)
Ahmed, A., & Ahsan, M. A. F. (2011). The right approach to teaching writing in an EAP setting: Some perspectives. In A. Ahmed, G. Cane & M. Hanzala (Eds.), Teaching English in multilingual contexts: current challenges, future directions (pp. 53–68). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bowden, D. (1995). The rise of a metaphor: “voice” in composition pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 14(1), 173–188.
Chandler, S. (2007). Fear, teaching composition, and students’ discursive choices: re-thinking connections between emotions and college student writing. Composition Studies, 35(2), 53–70.
Cheng, A. (2008). Analyzing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 50–71.
Deng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ generic competence: A genre-based & process genre approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Dryer, D. B. (2015). Writing is not natural. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (pp. 27–29). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Elashri, I. I. E. A. (2013). The effect of the genre-based approach to teaching writing on the EFL Al-Azhr secondary students’ writing skills and their attitudes towards writing [Monograph]. Retrieved from [URL]
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 761, 65–74.
Gillett, A. (2012, October 24). Using English for Academic Purposes: What is EAP? [Web log post]. Retrieved from [URL]
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 991, 445–476.
Graham, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing, 291, 781–792.
Gui, L. (2008). Critical pedagogy in EFL college writing instruction in China: An untested feasibility (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Toledo). Retrieved from [URL]
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Scoring procedures for ESL contexts. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Eds.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 241–276). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Going beyond NLEs to a more balanced approach. Instructional Science, 361, 395–408.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hillocks, G. (1984). What Works in Teaching Composition: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Treatment Studies. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 133–170.
Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22.
Hyon, S. (2001). Long-term effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for Specific Purposes, 201, 417–438.
(2002). Genre and ESL reading: A classroom study. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 121–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 211, 264–282.
Kostrova, O., & Kulinich, M. (2015). Text genre ‘academic writing’: intercultural view. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2061, 85–89.
Lee, M. (2012). Teaching genre-based writing to Korean high school students at a basic level (Master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin-River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.
Lin, B. (2006). Vygotskian principles in a genre-based approach to teaching writing. NUCB JLCC, 8(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Luong, Q. T., & Nguyen, T. M. H. (2008). Student writing process, perceptions, problems, and strategies in writing academic essays in a second language: A case study. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 241, 184–197.
Manouchehry, A., Farangi, M. A., Fatemi, M. A., & Qaviketf, F. (2014). The effect of two brainstorming strategies on the improvement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners writing skill. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 176–187.
Maghsoudi, M., & Haririan, J. (2013). The impact of brainstorming strategies Iranian EFL learners writing skill regarding their social status. Journal of language and linguistics, 1(1), 60–67.
Nguyen, H. D. (1956). Verbal and non-verbal patterns of respect behavior in Vietnamese society. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York University, New York.
Nguyen, H. H. T. (2009). Teaching efl writing in Vietnam: Problems and solutions-a discussion from the outlook of applied linguistics. VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 251, 61–66.
Pham, T. H. N. (2011). Communicating with Vietnamese in intercultural communication contexts: Insights into Vietnamese values. Hanoi: Educational Publishing House.
Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. New York, NY: Penguin.
Rahman, M. M. (2011). Genre-based writing instruction: Implications in ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, 33(11). Retrieved from [URL]
Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal, 62(2), 100–106.
Reynolds, G. A., & Perin, D. (2009). A comparison of text structure and self-regulated writing strategies for composing from sources by middle school students. Reading Psychology, 301, 265–300.
Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalizability of writing scores: An application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 657–677.
Stewart, D. C. (1972). The authentic voice: A pre-writing approach to student writing. Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown Co. Publishers.
Tillema, M., Van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2012). Quantifying the quality difference between L1 and L2 essays: A rating procedure with bilingual raters and L1 and L2 benchmark essays. Language Testing, 30(1), 71–97.
Tran, T. L. (2007). Learners’ motivation and identity in the Vietnamese EFL writing classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 151–163. Retrieved from [URL]
Trinh, Q. L., & Nguyen, T. T. (2014). Enhancing Vietnamese learners’ ability in writing argumentative essays. The Journal of Asia TEFT, 11(2), 63–91.
Van den Bergh, H., & Eiting, M. H. (1989). A method of estimating rater reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(1), 29–40.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Curtis, Kerry, Sin Wang Chong & Ming Sum Kong
Gupta, Deepti
Ouyang, Fan, Ning Zhang, Yunqing Chen & Xingjiang Shao
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
