Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 159 (2010) ► pp.52–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Punctuation in English and Its Interlanguage Effects

Underuse, Overuse and Misuse

 | Institut Supérieur Pédagogique de Mbanza-Ngungu (République démocratique du Congo)
 | Institut Supérieur Pédagogique de Mbanza-Ngungu (République démocratique du Congo)
Published online: 1 January 2010
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.159.03nsa
Abstract
This article discusses the manifestations of interlanguage punctuation from a short dialogue in which the subjects of the investigation had to restore missing punctuation marks. The testees realized a meagre score in the task, leaving out punctuation marks where they were compulsory, inserting punctuation marks where they were not needed, and placing punctuation marks where others were required. This state of affairs emanated from a poor command of these orthographic devices. The sample was composed of four groups of students of English, and the one-way analysis of variance conducted on their performance showed a significant difference across the groups. Such a situation proves that although punctuation is under-represented in grammar classes, students manage to acquire incidentally personal information on this area in their target language development. However, the knowledge acquired is inadequate to satisfy the specifications of punctuation in a piece of textual material. It was also observed that students encounter more problems with non-terminal than with terminal punctuation marks. Therefore, systematic instruction is recommended in order to promote students’ control of these devices in text production and in text reception.
References (39)
References
Bley-Vroman, R. W. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning, 331, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (2004). Fowler’s modern English usage, revised 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Fowler’s modern English usage, pocket ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Close, R. A. (1975). A reference grammar for students of English. Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41: 161–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corley, M. & Stewart, O. W. (2008). Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: the meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 4: 589–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckersley, C. E. and Eckersley, J. M. (1989). A comprehensive English grammar for foreign students. Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayol, M. & Costermans, J. (1997). Processing interclausal relationships in the production and comprehension of texts. Mahwal: Erlbaum. ([URL]).
Frank, M. (1993). Modern English. A practical reference guide, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goosse, A. (1993). Le bon usage. Grammaire française, 13è éd. Paris-Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, J. O. & Cappella, J. N. (1986). Cognition and talk: the relationship of semantic units to temporal patterns of fluency in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 29, 2:141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevise, M. (1980). Le bon usage. Grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse, M. & Goosse, A. (2008). Le bon usage, 14è éd. Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier/Editions De Boeck Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1980). Temporal variables within and between languages. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Towards a cross-linguistic assessment of speech production (pp. 39–54). Frankfurt: Verlag Peter D. Lang Gmb H.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatch, E. & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, Massachussets: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K & Johnson, H. (Eds.) (1999). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1975). A communicative grammar of English. Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1971). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mounin, G. (1995). Dictionnaire de la linguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemser, W. (1971). Approximative systems of foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 91: 115–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nsakala, L. (1984). Some suggestions for teaching reading. English Teaching Forum, 22, 3:45–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). What is an error? English Teaching Forum, 33, 3: 20–24, cont 19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nsakala, L. & Matondo, L. (2002). Approximations in impromptu interlanguage. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 137–138, 301–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partridge, E. (1995). Usage and abusage. A guide to good English. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A university grammar of English. London: Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayers, P. (2007). Why don’t learners learn what teachers teach? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center, San Antonio, TX. ([URL]).
Swan, M. (2005). Practical English usage, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Todd, L. (2000). The cassell guide to punctuation. Cassell. ([URL]).
Truss, L. (2003). Eats, shoots & leaves: The zero tolerance approach to punctuation. London: Profile Books. ([URL]).
Wilmet, M. (2003). Grammaire critique du français, 3è éd. Bruxelles: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webstites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
http://grammar.ccc.commet.edu/grammar/marks/quotation.htm
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue