Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 158 (2009) ► pp.77–96

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The Efficacy of Context and Cognitive Expert Patterns in Academic Vocabulary Learning

 | Departamento de Filología Inglesa Universidad de Salamanca
Published online: 1 January 2009
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046921
Abstract
This research intends to detect which instruction is most advisable for unknown English academic terms in first course students of English Philology. Fot this purpose it evaluates whether or not the context, with a small number of encounters (6) is superior to the visual help (expert cognitive pattern), obtained with the Pathfinder procedure (Schvaneveldt, Durso and Dearholt, 1989; Schvaneveldt, 1990; Thompson, Gomez and Schvaneveldt, 2000), when learning a complex vocabulary set; in this case, academic vocabulary (Coxhead, 1998). Results confirm that both types of instruction are useful when teaching this vocabulary however, context seems to be superior in spite of the small number of encounters used in the instruction. Bearing in mind the ease of getting appropriate contexts of use, this is the type of instruction that our research points to as the most recommendable.
References (54)
References
Academic Word List information. [URL].
Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Great Britain: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amer, A. A. (2002). Advanced vocabulary instruction in EFL. I-TESL-J, 8(11). [URL]
Cain, K. (2007). Deriving word meanings from context: Does explanation facilitate contextual analysis? Journal of research and reading, 30 (4), 347–359.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cañas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., Navarro, R., Padilla, F., & Puerta, M. C. (1998). Representación mental y programación de ordenadores. Cognitiva, 1-2 (10), 239–255.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, G. (1996). Memory for expertise. Memory in the real world. East Sussex: Psychology Press. 209–235.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooke, N. M. & McDonald, J. E. (1986). A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge. Proceedings of the IEEE, 74 (10), 1422–1430.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986). Recall and measures of memory organization. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 12 (4), 538–549.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (1998). An academic word list, Occasional Publication Number 18, LALS, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egan, D. E. & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and cognition, 7 (2), 149–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erten, I. H. & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on vocabulary acquisition of presenting new words in semantic sets versus semantically unrelated sets. System, 361, 407–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Beaton, A. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 46A (3), 533–558.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211–282). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engle, R. W. & Bukstel, L. (1978). Memory processes among Bridge players of differing expertise. American journal of psychology, 91 (4), 673–689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, P. & Blachowicz, C. (2007). Teaching how to think about words. Voices from the middle, 15 (1), 6–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grandy, R. E. (1992). Semantic fields, prototypes, and the lexicon. In A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 105–120). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, T. E., P. Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of educational psychology, 83 (1), 88–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonzalvo, P., Cañas, J. J., & Bajo, M. T. (1994). Structural representations in knowledge acquisition. Journal of educational psychology, 86 (4), 601–616.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Google search engine, scholar section. [URL]
Hashemi, R. H. & Gowdasiaei, F. (2005). An attribute-treatment interaction study: Lexical-set versus semantically unrelated vocabulary instruction. Regional language centre journal, 36(3), 341–361.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, M. M. 2000. Words on the web: Taking vocabulary out of the classroom and into cyberspace. ONLINE-ED internet journal, University of Melbourne, Australia.[URL]
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language, learning and technology, 9(2), 90–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, P. J., Goldsmith, T. E., & Teague, K. W. (1995). Similarity, structure, and knowledge: A representional approach to assessment. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman and R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 221–249). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The modern language journal, 731, 440–464.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: A Monte Carlo analysis. Applied linguistics, 26(1), 32–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara P. & Fitzpatrick, T. (2000). Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System, 28(1), 19–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meara. P., Lightbown, P. M., & Halter, R. H. (1997). Classrooms as lexical environments. Language teaching research, 1(1), 28–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, L. & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of TESL student performance. System, 32(1), 75–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development: Comparing lexical frequency profiles across drafts. System, 30(2), 225–235.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 Vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL quarterly, 37(4), 645–670.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. In M. H. Long and J. C. Richards (Series Eds.) and J. Coady and T. Huckin (Vol. Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 238–254). New York: Cambridge U. P.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in second language acquisition, 211, 589–619.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowe, A. L., Cooke, N. L., Hall, E. P., & Halgren, T. L. (1996). Toward an on-line knowledge assessment methodology: Building on the relationship between knowing and doing. Journal of experimental psychology: Applied, 2 (1), 31–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz, J. C., Algarabel, S., Dasí, C., & Pitarque, A. (1998). El papel de los diagramas en la organización del conocimiento: Evidencia desde el Pathfinder y el escalamiento multidimensional. Psicológica, 191, 367–386.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez, M. J. (2001). Eficacia del Word Association Test y del Pathfinder para medir el aprendizaje léxico del inglés como lengua extranjera. Miscelánea. A journal of English and American studies, 231, 99–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Efecto de la instrucción con patrones lingüísticos en el aprendizaje léxico: campo semántico ‘shine’. Estudios ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 101, 183–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Importancia de la composición de los campos semánticos en su aprendizaje. Miscelánea. A journal of English and American studies, 271, 229–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Effect of instruction with expert patterns on the lexical learning of English as a foreign language. System, 32 (1), 89–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez, M. J. & González, L, M. (2006). Instrucción léxica y aprendizaje. Atlantis, 28(2), 89–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saragi, T., Nation, P., & Meister, G. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 61, 72–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schvaneveldt, R. W., Ed. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schvaneveldt, R. M., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., & De Maio, J. C. (1985). Measuring the structure of expertise. International journal of man¬machine studies, 23(6), 699–728.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., & Dearholt, D. W. (1989). Network structures in proximity data. InG. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 241 (pp. 249–284). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shea, J. B. & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory, 5 (2), 179–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (1997). Learning and processing L2 vocabulary. Language teaching 30 (4), 213–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, D. M. & Johnson, K. E. (1995). Effects of varying levels of expertise on Backgammon strategy prioritization. Poster presented at the 36th annual meeting of The Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, L. A., Gomez, R. L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The salience of temporal cues in the developing structure of event knowledge. American journal of psychology 113 (4): 591–619.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2007a). The effects of synonymy on second language vocabulary learning. Reading in a foreign language, 19(2), 120–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: The effects of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language teaching research, 11 (1), 63–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a foreign language, 20(2), 232–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WordNet ([URL])
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue