Article published In: Learning and Teaching L2 Writing:
Guest-edited by Daphne van Weijen, Elke Van Steendam and Gert Rijlaarsdam
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 156] 2008
► pp. 133–151
Development of Fluency and Revision in L1 and L2 Writing in Swedish High School Years Eight and Nine
Published online: 1 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034428
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034428
Abstract
In this paper we use keystroke logging to examine the development of fluency and revision in high school L1 Swedish and L2 English writing. Each writer wrote one text in English and one in Swedish in each year of the study. Using a combination of statistical and automatic analyses of the keystroke log, we attempted to investigate: i) how the on-line writing process in terms of revising, pausing and fluency in first and second language writing changes over time, ii) whether there are on-line writing process variables which can be identified as contributing to text improvement, and iii) whether there are any aspects of L1 writing which can be identified as contributing to L2 writing and learning processes and which may form part of a teaching programme. Previous studies of L2 writers have attested to changes in fluency, pause and revision behaviour, and amount of text produced, although associations with the quality of the final output are not clearly supported. The within-writer comparison of this study addresses differences in fluency, pause and revision behaviour between L1 and L2 writing. A regression analysis looking at quality and two types of revision (Form, and Conceptual) found that form revision frequency was related to the language of writing and that conceptual revision frequency was dependent on linguistic experience rather than on language. The findings suggest that conceptual revision and writing skills are transferred from the L1 to the L2, and that these skills should be taught accordingly.
References (40)
Allal, L. (2000). Metacognitive regulation of writing in the classroom. In A. Camps & M. Milian (Eds.), Metalinguistic Activity in Learning to Write (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bosher, S. (1998). The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: an exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 205–241.
Chanquoy, L. (2001). How to make it easier for children to revise their writing: A study of text revision from 3rd to 5th grades. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 711, 15–41.
Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J. N., & Fayol, M. (1996). Writing in adults: a real-time approach. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds), Current research in writing: Theories, models and methodology (pp 36–43). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18 (1), 80 - 98.
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 321, 400–414.
Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 221, 365–387.
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbot, R. D. Abbot, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school children: a new methodological approach. Journal of Educational psychology, 89(1), 170–182.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3–12.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.) The Science of Writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jacobs, H.I., Zingraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.F. & Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: a practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Jakobsen, A. L. (2006). Research methods in translation—Translog. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and K. P. H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren. (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing, Vol. 181, Computer Keystroke Logging-Methods and Applications (pp. 95–105). Oxford: Elsevier.
Janssen, D., van Waes, L., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.). The Science of Writing (pp. 233–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kollberg, P. (1998). S-notation - A Computer Based Method for Studying and Representing Text Composition. Licentiate thesis, Stockholm: Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Leijten, M., & van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-line writing processes in a Windows environment. In G. Rijlaardam (Series Ed.) and K. P. H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Studies in Writing, Vol. 181, Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications, (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Elsevier.
Lindgren, E. (2004). The uptake of peer-intervention in the writing classroom. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and G. Rijlaarsdam, van den Bergh, H. & Couzijn, M. (Volume Eds.) Studies in Writing, Volume 141, Effective teaching and learning of writing, (pp. 259–272). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K.P.H. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and language awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awareness, 121, 172–186.
(2006). Analysing on-line revision. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and K.P.H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren, (Volume Eds.), Studies in Writing, Vol. 181, Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 157–188). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Lindgren, E. & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Writing and the analysis of revision: An overview In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and K. P. H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren. (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing, Vol. 181, Computer Keystroke Logging-Methods and Applications, (31–44). Oxford: Elsevier.
Matsuhashi, A. (1981). Pausing and planning: The tempo of written discourse production. Research in the Teaching of English, 151, 113–134.
McCutchen, D. (1996). Acapacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8 (3), 299–325.
(2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13–23.
Phinney, M., & Khouri, S. (1993). Computers, revision, and ESL writers: the role of experience. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2131, 257–277.
Rijlaarsdam, G., Couzijn, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2004). The study of revision as a writing process and as a learning-to-write process. Two prospective research agendas. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Volume Eds). Revision: cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 21–38) Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schilperoord, J. (1996). The distribution of pause time in written text production. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Current research in writing: Theories, models and methodology (pp. 21–35). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202.
Severinson Eklundh, K., & Kollberg, P. (1996). Computer tools for tracing the writing process: from keystroke records to S-notation. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn, M. (Eds.), Current Research in writing: Theories, models and methodology (pp. 526–541). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Spelman Miller, K., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Keystroke logging: an introduction. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and K. P. H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren (Volume Eds.). Studies in Writing, Volume 18, Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (pp. 1–9). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E., Sullivan, K.P.H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging, TESOL QUARTERLY Volume: 42 lssue: 3 Pages: 433–454.
Stevenson, M. (2005). Reading and writing in a foreign language: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic processes in Dutch and English. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & De Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: a multidimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 151, 201–233.
Strömqvist, S., & Ahlsén, E. (Eds.) (1999). The Process of Writing: a progress report. (Gothenburg papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 83) Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Linguistics.
Strömqvist, S. & Karlsson, H. (2002). ScriptLog for Windows - User’s Manual. Technical Report. University of Lund: Department of Linguistics, and University College of Stavanger: Centre for Reading Research.
Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., & Wengelin, A. (2006). What keystroke logging can reveal about writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and K. P. H. Sullivan, & E. Lindgren (Volume Eds.). Studies in Writing, Volume 18, Computer key-stroke logging: Methods and applications (45–71). Oxford: Elsevier.
Sullivan, K. P. H., & Lindgren, E. (2002). Self-assessment in autonomous computer-aided L2 writing. ELT Journal, 561, 258–266.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Chukharev, Evgeny, Jens Roeser, Mark Torrance & Wei Lun Wong
Haake, Lisa, Sebastian Wallot, Monika Tschense & Joachim Grabowski
Mohsen, Mohammed Ali
Johansson, Victoria, Åsa Wengelin & Roger Johansson
2023. Using keystroke logging for studying L2 writing processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 161 ff.
Foucambert, Denis, Tracy Heranic, Christophe Leblay, Maarit Mutta, Minjing Zhong, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
Ivanov, Sergej, Annelie Johansson & Christian Waldmann
Révész, Andrea, Marije Michel, Xiaojun Lu, Nektaria Kourtali, Minjin Lee & Laís Borges
Zetterholm, Elisabeth & Eva Lindström
Choi, Ikkyu & Paul Deane
Al-Saadi, Zulaikha & Mohammad Al Heidari-Shahreza
Bennett, Randy E., Mo Zhang, Paul Deane & Peter W. van Rijn
Chukharev-Hudilainen, Evgeny, Aysel Saricaoglu, Mark Torrance & Hui-Hsien Feng
Van Waes, Luuk & Mariëlle Leijten
de Smet, Milou J.R., Saskia Brand-Gruwel, Mariëlle Leijten & Paul A. Kirschner
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.