Article published In: Task-Based Language Teaching:
Edited by Kris Van den Branden and Machteld Verhelst
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 152] 2006
► pp. 55–84
The Effect of Task Complexity and Task Conditions on Foreign Language Development and Performance. Three Empirical Studies.
Published online: 1 January 2006
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017863
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017863
Abstract
It has been argued that tasks constitute a valid alternative unit to sequence the language learning process, as opposed to linguistically defined syllabuses. Implementing this claim presupposes that it is possible to assess the cognitive and linguistic demands of tasks, so that they can be sequenced in such a way that they optimally support and promote the L2 learning process. Knowing what demands a task will make opens up the possibility of using task design to manipulate the learner's attention between form and meaning in ways that may help interlanguage development.
In this article, we present three empirical studies, which have tried to manipulate task complexity in order to study the effects of differing levels of task complexity on (L2) performance. We situate our studies within the Triadic Componential Framework for Task Design (TCFTD), elaborated by Robinson (1995; 2001; 2005) and interpret our findings in the light of two alternative theories, trying to explain effects on L2 performance arising from task manipulation, namely the Limited Attentional Capacity Model (Skehan & Foster 2001), and the Cognition Hypothesis (Robinson 2001; 2005). Apart from yielding evidence against or in favour of these theories, our studies demonstrate that manipulating L2 learners' attention while performing a task is anything but straightforward. The studies also illustrate how task conditions appear to interact with task complexity.
References (40)
Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. (1993). Factors affecting the acquisition of vocabulary: frequency and saliency of words. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 263–286). Norwood: NJ: Ablex.
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 191, 197–205.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 3,215–247.
Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. PhD thesis, University of Barcelona.
(forthcoming). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and +/-Here-and-Now: effects on oral production. In M. Garda Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Huckin, T. & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 181–193.
Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M. & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language stUdents: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 801,327–339.
Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (forthcoming). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(2004a). II Bed, & Breakfast piu bello d'italia. Cognitieve taakcomplexiteit en tekstkwaliteit in Italiaans T2. [II Bed & Breakfast piu bello d'italia. Cognitive task complexity and text quality in Italian L2.]Incontri, 19,1 ,31–39.
(2004b). De relatie tussen cognitieve taakcomplexiteit en lingu'istische performance bij het schrijven in T1 en T2. [The relationship between cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in L 1 and L2 writing.] Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 721, 23–32.
Kuiken, F., Mas, M. & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M.P. Garcia-Mayo and J. Cenol (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook. Vol. 51 (pp. 195–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. In S.H. Foster-Cohen, M. Garcia-Mayo, & J. Cenol (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook Vol. 51 (pp. 223–250). Amsterdaml Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ughtbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 1, 27–56.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mondria, J-A., & Wit-de Boer, M. (1991). The Effects of contextual richness on the guessability and the retention of words in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 12, 3, 249–266.
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 3, 417–528.
Oberauer, K. et al. (2000). Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 291, 1017–1045.
Peters, E. (forthcoming). L2 vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. The influence of task complexity In. M. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(submitted). Manipulating students' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology.
Peters, E. & Sercu, L. (submitted). The influence of task complexity on vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. In Vliegen, M. ed., Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb. Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam 2004. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning 451, 283–331.
(2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Oxford: Blackwell.
(2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a triadic componential framework for second language task design. IRAL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1, 1–32.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching Abstracts, 301, 73–87.
Staud, T. (2003 October). Ossis sind Türken. 13 Jahre Einheit: In Gesamt-Westdeutschland sind die Ostdeutschen Einwanderer. Die Zeit, 411. Retrieved October 2, 2003 from [URL].
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Julia Goetze
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
O'Leary, John A. & Rasmus Steinkrauss
Dao, Phung, Noriko Iwashita & Elizabeth Gatbonton
Frear, Mark Wain & John Bitchener
Peters, Elke, Jan H. Hulstijn, Lies Sercu & Madeline Lutjeharms
Abraham, Lee B.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.