Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 149/150 (2005) ► pp.47–76
Investigating the clause complex
An analysis of exposition-type essays written by Secondary School Students in Singapore
Published online: 1 January 2005
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004372
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.150.0.2004372
The situation in many composition classes in Singapore is characterized by scaffolding (Vygot-sky, 1962; Bruner, 1985), where students are given explicit guidance, particularly concerning the organizational structure of the essay. With scaffolding, there is a concern that the students will produce similarly-structured essays. How then does one differentiate a good essay from a less well-written one? Using Halliday's clause-complex framework (Halliday and Matthiessen, 2004), our analysis shows that while the better writers display a greater mastery of clause-complex structures, the weaker writers rely heavily on simplex constructions. In addition to scaffolding, we argue that the appropriate use of clause-complex structures should be incorporated as part of the writing lesson.
References (18)
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives (pp. 21–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S. and Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. Sydney: NCELTR.
Chew, G. L. P. (2005). Change and continuity: English language teaching in Singapore. Asian EFL Journal, 71(11): Article 1.
De Silva Joyce, H. and Feez, S. (2000). Creating Writing Skills: Literary and Media Text Types. Sydney: Phoenix Education. English Language Syllabus (2001). Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
Greenbaum, S. and Nelson, G. (1995). Clause relationships in spoken and written English. Functions of Language, 2(1), 1–21.
Guidelines to the English Language Syllabus (2001). Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore.
Gupta, A. F. (1994). The Step-Tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
(1981). Types of structures. In Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (Eds.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics (pp. 29–41). London: Batsford.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hassan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.
Nesbitt, C. and Plum, G. (1988). Probabilities in a systemic-functional grammar: The clause complex in English. In Fawcett, R. P. and Young, D. (Eds.), New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol. 21: Theory and Application (pp. 6–38). London: Pinter.
NG Y. L. T. (2005), Explicit Instruction to Narrative Writing: How it can Help Students Organize and Develop their Narratives. Unpublished MA Critical Inquiry, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Seow A. (1995). The writing process and ‘process writing’. Teaching of English Language and Literature, 11(1): 60–63.
Statistics Singapore (2000). Retrieved December 3, 2004, from [URL].
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Leong, Alvin Ping
Rasool, Attia, Asim Mehmood & M. Raheel Ashraf
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.