Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 139/140 (2003) ► pp.153–190
Writing Processes of EFL Students in argumentative Essays
a Case Study
Published online: 1 January 2003
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003202
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003202
The paper reports on a case study of the writing processes and products of Tunisian EFL university students in an argumentative essay. The data came from (i) audio-taped think-aloud protocols followed by immediate retrospective comments, (ii) experts' comments and grades on the subjects' products, and (iii) a questionnaire administered to the students. Results of the process analysis, using an adapted version of the coding scheme used by A. RAIMES (1985;1987), corroborated by the questionnaire fmdings, showed that students wrote fluently and concerned themselves more with meaning than with granunatical correctness. However, they planned very little, rarely made notes before writing, and rarely rewrote. They faced difficulties especially in fmding the appropriate word and in organizing their ideas. At the local level, products showed inaccurate use of mechanics and granunar. At a more global level, most essays lacked clear thesis statement, substantial support of claims, adequate transitions, and hedged statements. The product problems were partially attributed to little planning, notemaking, and revising. The process strategies were themselves related to writing habits for which the classroom and the exam settings are partly responsible.
References (45)
AL-ABED-AL-HAQ, F. & AHMED, A.S.E..A. (1994). Discourse problems in argumentative writing. World Englishes 131, 307–323.
ARNDT, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal 41(4), 257–267.
ATARI, O.F. & TRIKI, M. (2000). The formal features of oral and literate strategies of communication: Their implications for EFL writing revision. IRAL 381, 95–107.
BERRIL, D.P. (1996). Reframing argument from the metaphor of war. In D.P. Berril (Ed.), Perspectives on written argument (pp. 171–187). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
CONNOR, U. (1987). Argumentative pattern in students' essays: Cross cultural differences. In U. Connor and R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages (pp. 57–72). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
CONRAD, S.M. & GOLDSTEIN, L.M.(1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly 24 (3),443–460.
CUMMING, A. (1995). Fostering writing expertise in ESL composition instruction: Modelling and evaluation. In D. Belcher and G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 375–397). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
DAOUD, M. (2000). LSP in North Africa: Status, problems, and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 201, 77–96.
DUDLEY-EVANS, T. and SWALES, J. (1980). Study modes and students from the Middle East. 109. Study modes and academic development of overseas students (pp. 91–98). The British Council.
ENKVIST, N.E. (1990). Seven problems in the study of coherence and interpretability. In U. Connor and A.M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 11–28). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
ERICSSON, K.A. and SIMON, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
FAERCH, C. and KASPER, G. (Eds.). (1983). Strategies in interlanguage communications. London: Longman, Ltd.
FAKHRI, A. (1994). Text organisation and transfer: The case of Arab ESL learners. IRAL, XXII, (1), 79–86.
FATHMAN, A.K. and WHALLEY, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
FRIEDLANDER, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of a fITst language on writing in English as a second language In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp.109–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
GOVIER, T. (1996). Writers, readers, and arguments. In D.R. Berril (Ed.), Perspectives on written argument (pp. 73–89). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
HALIMAH, A.M. (2001). Rhetorical duality and Arabic speaking EST learners. English for Specific Purposes 201, 111–139.
HYLAND, K. (1994). Hedging academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 181 (31), 239–256.
KAMEL, G. (1989). Argumentative writing by Arab learners of English as a foreign and second language: An empirical investigation of contrastive rhetoric. Dissertation Abstracts International 50 (3), 677A.
KAMIMURA, T. (2000). Integration of process and product orientations in EFL writing instruction. RELC Journal 31 (2), 1–28.
KAPLAN, R.B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16 (1), 1–20.
(1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor and R.B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 9–20). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing company.
LAY, N.D.S. (1982). Composing process of adult ESL learners: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (3), 406.
MAAMOURI-GHRIB, E. (2001). Thinking and writing in EFL: Cutting off Medusa's head. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 133–134, 243–269.
MAHFOUDHI, A. (2001a). Teaching EFL writing: Students' hidden agenda. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa 291, 19–50.
(2001b). ESL/EFL writing: Towards an integrative approach. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics 27(2), 149–166.
OSTLER, S.E. (1987). English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor and R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 169–184). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
OUAOUICHA, D. (1986). Contrastive rhetoric and structure of learnerproduced argumentative texts in Arabic and English. Dissertation Abstracts International 47 (9), 3339A.
RAIMES, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL learners do as they write: A classroom study of composing. Tesol Quarterly 25 (3), 407–430.
(1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning 371, 439–468.
ROSE, M. (1980). Rigid Rules, inflexible plans and the stifling of language: A cognitive analysis of writers= block. College Composition and Communication 31 (4), 389–401.
SASAKI, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(3), 259–291.
SASAKI, M. & HIROSE, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students' expository writing. Language Learning 46(1), 137–174.
SCHLEPPEGRELL, M.J. (1996). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics 17 (3), 271–285.
SILVA, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly 41 (1), 37–43.
SWALES, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Gao, Huixin, Harwati Hashim & Melor Md Yunus
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.