Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 139/140 (2003) ► pp.77–100
An implicational Hierarchy of Morpheme Acquisition Order in second Language Learning
Longxin Wei | Linguistics Department, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, New Jersey 07043, USA
Published online: 1 January 2003
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199
https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199
Unlike most early second language morpheme acquisition studies which remained at a surface descriptive level, this paper provides the reasons for the natural morpheme acquisition order by characterizing morphemes based on how they are projected from the mental lexicon. Three types of morphemes are identified based on how they are activated: Morphemes directly elected at the lemma level are content morphemes, morphemes indirectly elected together with content morpheme heads are early system morphemes, and morphemes structurally assigned at the functional level are late system morphemes. It argues that the levels of morpheme activation, whether at the lemma level or at the fimctional level, determines the acquisition order. Based on the characterization of morphemes and the natural second language data, an irnplicational hierarchy of morpheme acquisition order in second language learning is proposed: content morphemes are acquired before system morphemes, and early system morphemes are acquired before late system morphemes. Unlike early second language morpheme acquisition order studies, this study not only identifies or describes the morpheme order itself but also provides some reasons for this order.
References (38)
ABNEY, S.P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
BAILEY, N., C. MADDEN & S.D. KRASHEN. 1974. Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning 241:235–44.
BOCK, K. W.M. LEVELT. 1994. Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M.A. Gemsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). New York: Academic Press.
DULAY, H.C. and M.K. BURT. 1972. Goofing: an indicator of children's second language strategies. Language Learning 221:234–52.
DULAY, H.C. and M.K. BURT. 1974a. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 241:37–53.
. 1974b. You can't learn without goofing. In J. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.
DULAY, H.C. M.K. BURT. 1975. Creative construction in second language learning and teaching. In M. Burt and H. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL =75: New directions in second language learning, teaching and bilingual education (pp. 21–32). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
FINCH, H.. 1996. Personal communication. The Statistics Laboratory at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
FRIEDERICI, A.D., J. WEISSENBORN & M. KAIL. 1991. Pronoun comprehension in aphasia: A comparison of three languages. Brain and Language 411:289–310.
HATCH, E. & H. FARHADY. 1982. Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
JAKE, J.L. 1994. Intrasentential codes witching and pronouns: On the categorical status offunctional elements. Linguistics 321:271–98.
JAKE, J.L. and C. MYERS-SCOTTON. 1997. Relating interlanguage to codeswitching: The composite matrix language. Proceedings of Boston University Conference on Language Development 319–330. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
JOSHI, A. 1985. Processing of sentences with intrasentential code switching. In D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A.M. Awicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 190–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KLEIN, W., R. DIETRICH & C. NOYAU. 1993. The acquisition of temporality. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives, Vol. 21 (pp. 73–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KLEIN, W. & C. PERDUE. 1993. Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives, Vol. 21 (pp. 3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KLEINMANN, H. 1977. Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning 271: 93–107.
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. 1975a. The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult learners of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
LONG, M. and C. SATO. 1983. Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. Seliger and M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
MYERS-SCOTTON, C.. 1993. Duelling Languages: Grammatical structures in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
. 1997. Afterward. In Duelling languages: Grammatical structures in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MYERS-SCOTTON, C. & J.K. JAKE. 1995. Matching lemmas in a bilingual competence and performance model: Evidence from intrasentential code switching. Linguistics 331:981–1024.
. 2000. Explaining aspects of codeswitching and their implications. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 91–125). Oxford: Blackwell.
PERDUE, C. (Ed.). 1993. Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
VANPATTEN, B. 1984. Processing strategies and morpheme acquisition. In F.R. Eckman, L.H. Bell, and D. Nelson (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 88–98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
. 1995. Cognitive aspects of input processing in second language-acquisition. In P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado, and M. Van Naerssen (Eds.), Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 170–83). New York: McGraw-Hill.
WEI, L. 1996a. Organizational principles behind codes witching and interlanguage development in early adult second language acquisition. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, B. Davidson, S. Schwenter, and J. Solomon (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Selected papers from NWAV 23 (pp. 417–31). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
WEI, L.. 1996b. Variation in the acquisition of morpheme types in the interlanguage of Chinese and Japanese learners of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
. 2000. Unequal election of morphemes in adult second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 21/1: 106–140.
. 2001a. Lemma congruence checking between languages as an organizing principle in intrasentential code switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 5/1: 153–173.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Lozano, Cristóbal & Ana Díaz-Negrillo
2019. Using learner corpus methods in L2 acquisition
research. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
