Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (40)
ALSAGOFF, L. (1998). The grammar of Singapore English. In L. Alsagoff, Z. Bao, A. Pakir, I.S. Talib & L. Wee (Eds.), Society, Style and Structure in Language (pp. 215–246). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BEACH, R. (1989). Showing students how to assess: Demonstrating techniques for response in the writing conference. In C.M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and Response (pp. 127–148). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of EnglishGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BRlTTON, J.N., BURGESS, T., MARTIN, N., MCLEOD, A. & ROSEN, H. (1975). The Development of Written Abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BURKLAND, J. & GRIMM, N. (1986). Motivating through responding. Journal of Teaching Writing 51, 237–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CARNICELLI, T.A. (1980). The writing conference: A one-to-one conversation. In T.R. Donovan and B.W. McClelland (Eds.), Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition (pp. 101–132). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CARSON, J.G. & NELSON, G.L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing 3(1), 17–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COHEN, A.D. & CAVALCANTI, M.C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 155–177). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COOPER, C. & ODELL, L. (1976). Considerations of sound in the composing process of published writers. RTE 131, 121–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DAIKER, D.A. (1989). Learning to praise. In C.M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and Response (pp. 103–113). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DEAN, T. (1994). Multicultural classrooms, monocultural teachers. In G. Tate, E.P.J. Corbett & N. Myers (Eds.), The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook (pp. 105–118), 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
EMIG, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. NCTE Research Report 131. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
English Language Syllabus (1991). Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Curriculum Planning and Development Division, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FATHMAN, A.K. & WHALLEY, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 178–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FERRlS, D.R., PEZONE, S., TADE, C.R. & TINTI, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 6(2),155–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FLORIO, S. & CLARK, C. (1982). The functions of writing in an elementary classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 161, 115–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FLOWER, L. & HAYES, J.R. (1980). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication 31(1), 21–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 31(5), 311–324.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FREEDMAN, S.W. (1987). Response to student writing. NCTE Research Report 231. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
GAGE, J.T. (1986). The teaching of writing: Theory and practice. In A R. Petrosky and D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The Teaching of Writing (pp. 8–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
GRAVES, D. (1975). An examination of the writing processes of seven-year-old children. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 227–241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Writing: Children and Teachers at Work. Exeter: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
GUPTA, A. F. (1992). The pragmatic particles of Singapore colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics 181,31–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
JONES, N. (1982). Design, discovery, and development: A case study. DAI, 43(04A).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KINKEAD, J.A. & HARRIS, J.G. (Eds.) (1993). Writing Centers in Context: Twelve Case Studies. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KNOBLAUCH, C.H. & BRANNON, L. (1984). Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing. New Jersey: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LEKI, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 57–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MANGELSDORF, K. & SCHLUMBERGER, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1 (3), 235–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MORGAN, M. (1988). The Composing Process of Student Collaborative Writers. PhD dissertation. Purdue University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MURRAY, D.M. (1968). A Writer Teaches Writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In C.R. Cooper and L. Odell (Eds.), Research on Composing: Points of Departure (pp. 85–103). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Writing as process. In T.R. Donovan and B.W. McClelland (Eds.), Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition (pp. 3–20). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ODELL, L. GOSWAMI, P. (Eds.) (1986). Writing in Nonacademic Settings. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAIMES, A. (1987). Exploring through Writing: A Process Approach to ESL Composition: Instructor's Manual. New York: Saint Martin's Press, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ROSKELLY, H. (1994). The risky business of group work. In G. Tate, E.P.J. Corbett, and N. Myers (Eds.), The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook (pp. 141–146), 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RUBIN, L. (1985). Uneven performance: What students do and don't know about their own writing. The Writing Instructor, 41, 157–167.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singapore Department of Statistics (2000). Statistics Singapore [URL]
THOMAS, D. THOMAS, G. (1989). The use of Rogerian reflection in small-group writing conferences. In C.M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and Response (pp. 114–126). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
TSUI, A.B.M. & NG, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WHITE, E.M. (1994). Teaching and Assessing Writing. 2nd edition. California: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Song, Geraldine, Lee Hwee Hoon & Leong Ping Alvin
2017. Students’ Response to Feedback: An Exploratory Study. RELC Journal 48:3  pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Jamalinesari, Ali, Farahnaz Rahimi, Hsbib Gowhary & Akbar Azizifar
2015. The Effects of Teacher-Written Direct vs. Indirect Feedback on Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 192  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Montgomery, Julie L. & Wendy Baker
2007. Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 16:2  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue