Cover not available

Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 135/136 (2002) ► pp.1–35

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Reading Strategies in L1 and L2

Comparison of Four Groups of Readers with Different Reading Ability in L1 and L2

 | Nagoya University (Japan)
Published online: 1 January 2002
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.135-136.01yam
Abstract
This study compared LI (Japanese) and L2 (English) reading strategies reported by four groups of readers with different reading ability backgrounds. Information on the strategies was extracted by a think aloud method. The following points emerged. (1) Generally speaking, readers tend to transfer their LI reading strategies to their L2 reading. (2) Language independent strategies are more likely to be transferred from LI to L2 than language dependent strategies. (3) High LI reading ability compensates for weak L2 reading ability, but there is a limit to this compensation. These results suggested a stronger relationship between LI and L2 reading processes than is predicted by the linguistic threshold hypothesis. The possibility that we can explain the results by combining the linguistic threshold hypothesis and the linguistic interdependence hypothesis, which have often been treated as conflicting, was discussed.
References (27)
References
ALDERSON, J.C. (1984). Reading in a Foreign Language: a Reading Problem or a Language Problem. In Alderson J.C, and Urquhart A.H. (eds.).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ALDERSON, J.C., and Urquhart, A.H. (eds.) (1984). Reading in a Foreign Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BERNHARDT, E.B., and KAMIL, M.L.. (1995). Interpreting Relationships between L1 and L2 Reading: Consolidating the Linguistic Threshold and the Linguistic Interdependence Hypotheses. Applied Linguistics. 16. 1. 15-34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BLOCK, E. (1986). The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers. TESOL Quarterly. 20. 3. 463-494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). See How They Read: Comprehension Monitoring of L1 and L2 Readers. TESOL Quarterly. 26. 2. 319-343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BOSSERS, B. (1991). On Thresholds, Ceilings and Short-Circuits: The Relation between L1 Reading, L2 Reading and L2 Knowledge. In Hulstijn, J.H., and Matter, J.F. (eds.) 45-60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Reading in Two Languages: A Study of Reading Comprehension in Dutch as a Second Language and in Turkish as a First Language. Rotterdam: Drukkerij Van Driel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BRISBOIS, J.I. (1995). Connections between First- and Second-Language Reading. Journal of Reading Behavior. 27. 4. 565-584. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CARRELL, P.L. (1991). Second Language Reading: Reading Ability or Language Proficiency? Applied Linguistics. 121. 59-179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COHEN, A.D. (1984a). Studying Second-Language Learing Strategies: How Do We Get the Information? Applied Linguistics. 5. 2. 101-112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984b). On Taking Language Tests: What the Students Report. Language Testing. 1. 1. 70-91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COHEN, A. D.(1986). Mentalistic Measures in Reading Strategy Research: Some Recent Findings. English for Specific Purposes. 5. 2. 131-145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
COHEN, A.D., and Hosenfeld, C. (1981). Some Uses of Mentalistic Data in Second Language Research. Language Learning. 31. 2. 285-313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DAVIS, J.N., and BISTODEAU, L. (1993). How do L1 and L2 Reading Differ: Evidence from Think Aloud Protocals. Modern Language Journal. 771. 459-472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DEVINE, J., CARRELL, P., and ESKEY, D.E. (1987). Research in Reading in English as a Second Language. TESOL, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ERICSSON, A., and SIMON, H. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (revised edition). MIT Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FAERCH, C. and KASPER, G. (1987). Introspection in Second Language Research. Philadelphia. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
HORIBY, Y. (1990). Narrative Comprehension Processes: A Study of Native and Non-Native Readers of Japanese. Modern Language Journal. 74. 2. 188-202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
HULSTIJN, J.H. and MATTER, J.F. (eds.) (1991) Reading in Two Languages. AILA Review. 81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LEE, J., and SCHALLERT, D.L. (1997). The Relative Contribution of L2 Language Proficiency and L1 Reading Ability to L2 Reading Performance: A Test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL Context. TESOL Quarterly. 31. 4. 713-739. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PERKINS, K., BRUTTEN, S.R., and POHLMANNM, J.T. (1989). First and Second Language Reading Comprehension. RELC Journal. 201. 1-9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PRESSLEY, M., and AFFLERBACH, P. (1995). Verbal Protocols of Reading. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SARIG, G. (1987). High-level Reading in the First and in the Foreign Language: Some Comparative Process Data. In Devine, J. et al. (eds.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SCHOONEN, R., HULSTIJN, J., and BOSSERS, B. (1998). Metacognitive and Language-Specific Knowledge in Native and Foreign Language Reading Comprehension: An Empirical Study Among Dutch Students in Grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning. 481. 71-106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
TAILLEFER, G.E. (1996). L2 Reading Ability: Further Insight into the Short-circuit Hypothesis. Modern Language Journal. 80. 4. 461-477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
YAMASHITA, J. (1999). Reading in a First and a Foreign Language: A Study of Reading Comprehension in Japanese (the LI) and English (the L2). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Lancaster University. UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ZWAAN, R., and BROWN, C.M. (1996). The Influence of Language Proficiency and Comprehension Skill on Situation-Model Construction. Discourse Processes. 211. 289-327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Reynolds, Barry Lee & Chen Ding
2024. The predictive effects of reading speed and positive affect on first and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading an authentic novel. Applied Linguistics Review 15:5 ► pp. 2149 ff. DOI logo
Talebi, Seyed Hassan, Javad Fallahi & Ali Amjadi
2024. Strategic reading comprehension in L2 and L3: assuming relative interdependence within Cummins’ linguistic interdependence hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:4 ► pp. 1903 ff. DOI logo
Toplu, Nuray Caylak & Ismail Hakki Erten
2023. A Study into the Interplay Between First and Second Language Reading Motivation, Reading Habits and Vocabulary Size. Sustainable Multilingualism 22:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
KOBUL, Mustafa Kerem & Mustafa Naci KAYAOĞLU
2022. İngilizce’yi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenler İçin Yardımlı Okumaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği Geliştirilmesi. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD) DOI logo
Khaghaninejad, Mohammad Saber
2020. Are reading comprehension ability and its strategies transferable from L1 to L2? Evidence from upper-intermediate EFL learners in Iran. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38:4 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Song, Kwangok, Bokhee Na & Hyun Joo Kwon
2020. A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in English-as-an-additional language. Educational Research Review 29 ► pp. 100308 ff. DOI logo
Umek, Alenka
2020. Reading Comprehension of Subject-specific Texts in a Foreign Language. Andragoška spoznanja 26:2 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Bang, Jyun
2017. 2017 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Lu‐Chun & Wan‐Yu Yu
2015. A think‐aloud study of strategy use by EFL college readers reading Chinese and English texts. Journal of Research in Reading 38:3 ► pp. 286 ff. DOI logo
Gabryś-Barker, Danuta
2014. On Applying Simultaneous Introspection in Researching Language Acquisition. In Language Learning, Discourse and Communication [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Karimi, Mohammad Nabi & Mohamood Reza Atai
2014. ESAP Students’ Comprehension of Multiple Technical Reading Texts: Insights from Personal Epistemological Beliefs. Reading Psychology 35:8 ► pp. 736 ff. DOI logo
Bowles, Melissa A.
2010. Concurrent Verbal Reports in Second Language Acquisition Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
TAFAGHODTARI, MARZIEH H.
2008. SECOND AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE LISTENING: UNRAVELING THE CONSTRUCT. Perceptual and Motor Skills 107:5 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Tafaghodtari, Marzieh H. & Larry Vandergrift
2008. Second and Foreign Language Listening: Unraveling the Construct. Perceptual and Motor Skills 107:1 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Yamashita, Junko
2008. Extensive reading and development of different aspects of L2 proficiency. System 36:4 ► pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Bowles, Melissa A. & Ronald P. Leow
2005. REACTIVITY AND TYPE OF VERBAL REPORT IN SLA RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Expanding the Scope of Investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27:3 ► pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Amos, Rob Schoonen, Kees de Glopper, Jan Hulstijn, Annegien Simis, Patrick Snellings & Marie Stevenson
2004. Linguistic Knowledge, Processing Speed, and Metacognitive Knowledge in First- and Second-Language Reading Comprehension: A Componential Analysis.. Journal of Educational Psychology 96:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue