Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 133/134 (2001) ► pp.243–269
Thinking and Writing in EFL
Cutting off Medusa's Head
Published online: 1 January 2001
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.133-134.04maa
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.133-134.04maa
Abstract
This research examines university students' writing problems and strategies; it also tries to investigate the way learner difficulties and strategies are perceived by students and teachers. Two questionnaires were conducted to find out both students' and teachers' assessment of these difficulties and strategies, and a corpus of 25 exam copies was examined, errors were classified, their sources analysed and strategies defined.
This study aims to point out the major difficulties that our EFL learners encountered in writing and to find out some of the reasons that could explain them. It also tries to see whether there were any discrepancies between the students’ and teachers’ assessment of writing difficulties and strategies and the students’ ‘real’ problems and strategy use, at least, as they were displayed in their exam copies. One of the major goals is also to identify and define Tunisian learners’ writing strategies and see whether they match those of ESL and EFL learners in the literature.
The research is based on the following hypotheses:
a) Students have difficulties in expressing their thoughts and ideas in the FL because they generate them in the L1 and then try to translate them in the FL.
b) Students’ problems are mainly conceptual; i.e, they result from a lack of understanding of the new concepts introduced in the course and course materials.
The results showed that the learners’ difficulties were mainly grammatical and organizational and that, just like other learners, our students made use of metacognitive, cognitive, social and affective strategies when handling their linguistic tasks.
References (22)
BROWN, H. Douglas. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Inc., N.J.
COHEN, D. Andrew & Marilda C. CAVALCANTI. 1991. Feedback on Compositions : Teacher and Student Verbal Reports, in Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom, B. Kroll (ed.) Cambridge University Press. 2nd Printing, pp. 155–177.
DUDLEY-EVANS, Tony. 1988. A Consideration of the Meaning of ‘Discuss’ in Examination Questions, in E.L.T. Documents: 129 : Academic Writing: Process and Product, Modern English Publications in association with the British Council, P.C. Robinson (ed.), Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading, pp. 47–52.
FAERCH, Claus & Gabriele KASPER (eds.). 1992. Strategies in Inter-language Communication, Longman Group Limited. 5th impression.
GHRIB-MAAMOURI, Esma & Leila LAKHOUA-NlGROU 1996 : Conceptual Bugs in E.F.L. Students’ Texts, paper presented at the Second I.A.T.E.F.L. Balkan E.L.T. Conference, Istambul, Turkey, September (not published).
GHRIB-MAAMOURI, Esma 1998 : Attitudinal Factors Underlying Spelling, Capitalization and Punctuation errors in EFL Writing', in Proceedings of the 1998 European Writing Conference, the ‘Writing and Learning to Write at the Dawn of the 21st Century’ Proceedings, LaCo-CNRS, Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société, Université de Poitiers, pp. 87–92.
HAMP-LYONS, Liz. 1988. The Product Before : Task-Related Influences on the Writer, in E.L.T. Documents: 129 : Academic Writing : Process and Product, Modern English in association with the British Council, P.C. Robinson (ed.) Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading pp. 35–46.
HAMP-LYONS, Liz & Grant HENNING. 1991. Communicative Writing Profiles : An Investigation of the Transferability of a Multiple - Trait Scoring Instrument Across ESL Writing Assessment Contexts, inLanguage Learning, Vol. 41, No. 3, Sept., pp. 337–373.
KOBAYASHI, Hiroe & Carol RINNERT. 1992. Effects of First language on Second Language Writing : Translation versus Direct Composition, in Language Learning 42:2, pp. 183–215.
KRASHEN, D. Stephen. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Pergamon Institute of English.
KROLL, Barbara. 1991. What does Time Buy? ESL Student Performance on Home versus Class Compositions, in Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom, B. Kroll (ed.), Cambridge University Press. 2nd Printing, pp. 140–154.
KROLL, Barbara (ed.). 1991. Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. Cambridge University Press, 2nd Printing.
LARSEN-FREEMAN, Diane & Michael H. LONG 1991 : An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research, Longman, Inc. N. Y.
Mc.DONOUGH, S. 1995. Strategy and Skill in Learning a Foreign Language, Edward Arnold (ed.), St. Martin's Press Inc.
O'BRIEN, Teresa. 1988. Writing for Continuous Assessment or Examinations. A Comparison of Style, in E.L.T. Documents: 129 Academic Writing : Process and Product, Modern English Publications in association with the British Council. P.C. Robinson (ed.), Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading, pp. 67–74.
O'MALLEY, Michael J., Anna Uhl CHAMOT. 1990. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press.
ROBINSON, Pauline C. (ed.). 1988. E.L.T. Documents: 129 : Academic Writing: Process and Product, Modern English Publications in association with the British Council, Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
SCHLEPPEGRELL, J. Mary. 1996. Conjunction in Spoken English and ESL Writing, in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 17, No. 3, September, Oxford University Press, pp. 271–285.
SCHUMANN, John & Nancy STENSON (eds.). 1974. New Frontiers in Second Language Learning. Rowley, Mass. Newbury House.
WALL, Dianne, Andrew NICKSON, R.R. JORDAN, Joan ALLWRIGHT & Diane HOUGHTON. 1988. Developing Student Writing. A Subject Tutor and Writing Tutors Compare Points of View, in E.L.T. Documents: 129. Academic Writing: Process and Product, Modern English Publications in association with the British Council, P.C. Robinson (ed.), Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading, pp. 117–129.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Abba, Katherine A., R. Malatesha Joshi & Xuejun Ryan Ji
2019. Analyzing writing performance of L1, L2, and Generation 1.5 community college students through Coh-Metrix. Written Language & Literacy 22:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.