Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 127/128 (2000) ► pp.101–126
Effects of Cultural Contextualization in Listening Materials on Motivation and Strategy Use
Published online: 1 January 2000
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.127-128.05kaw
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.127-128.05kaw
Abstract
There are two fundamentally different views regarding which side of culture, i.e., target or base, foreign language learning materials should take. Approaches that emphasize the learner's assimilation into the target culture tend to advocate the use of learning materials which focus on the target side, while those that signify cross-cultural communication are inclined to emphasize the need for information-sending regarding the learner's own culture. From a constructivist perspective, content relevance of learning materials to the learner's existing knowledge is a key ingredient for intrinsic motivation. Acculturation theories, on the other hand, predict that those who are ready to be assimilated in the target culture will have more chance of success in foreign language learning, and therefore learning materials should focus on the target culture.
The author conducted a study investigating if the use of culture-bound proper nouns in materials for listening comprehension may influence the motivation towards foreign language learning, which could eventually make a difference in the use of general learning strategies. Japanese learners of English, subjects in this study, were divided into two groups : one which listened to listening materials using Japanese proper nouns such as Hanako, Sapporo, Judo, etc., and the other which listened to those using English counterparts such as Jane, Atlanta, basketball, etc. The other parts of the material were the same. Pre- and post-tests were conducted regarding motivation and strategy use before and after the ten-week-long listening practice.
The research results revealed that the expected tendency exists but that was not statistically significant. The researcher further investigated the effects of learning styles. The relationship among these variables is intricate, and foreign language learning appeared multidimensional. The results implies that learning materials do not have to reside on one-side of either base or target cultures. Further investigation is recommended to examine if other means of learning material personalization may affect motivation and strategy use.
References (32)
CROOKES, G. & SCHMIDT, R. (1991) : Motivation : Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning 411:469–512.
DANSEREAU, D.F. (1985) : Learning strategy research. In J.W. Segal,D.F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills : Relating Learning to Basic Research, pp.209–240. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
DÖRNYEI, Z. (1994) : Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal 781:273–284.
EHRMAN, M.E. & OXFORD, R.L. (1995) : Cognition plus : Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal 791:67–89.
ELY, C. (1986) : Language learning motivation : A descriptive and causal analysis. Modern Language Journal 701:28–35.
GARDNER, R.C. (1979) : Social psychological aspects of second language acquisition. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.) Language and Social Psychology, pp.193–220. Oxford : Blackwell.
(1985) : Social Psychology and Second Language Learning : The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London, Ontario : Arnold.
GARDNER, R.C. & LAMBERT, W.E. (1972) : Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
IRAN-NEJAD, A. (1994) : Thematic organizer as a toll for teaching from a wholetheme perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
JORDEN, E.H. & NODA, M. (1987) : Japanese : The Spoken Language. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
MUCHNICK, A. & WOLFE, D., (1982) : Attitudes and motivations of American students of Spanish. 262–81.
O'MALLEY, J.M., & CHAMOT, A.U.(1990) : Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
OKADA, M., OXFORD, R.L., & ABO, S. (1996): Not all alike : Motivation and learning strategies among students of Japanese and Spanish in an exploratory study, In R.L. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Motivation : Pathways to the New Century, pp. 105–119. Honolulu : HA : University of Hawai Press.
OXFORD, R.L. (1989) : Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System 171: 235–247.
(1990) : Language Learning Strategies : What Every Teacher Should Know. New York : Newbury House/Harper & Row. [Japanese translation by SHISHIDO, M. & BAN, N. (1994), Tokyon: Bonjinsha].
OXFORD, R., LAVINE, R., & CROOKALL, D. (1989) : Language learning strategies, the communicative approach, and their classroom implications. Foreign Language Annals 22(l):29–39.
OXFORD, R.L., SHEARIN, J. & BARNARD, K. (1993) : Japanese by Satellite : Effects of Motivation, Language Learning Styles and Strategies, Gender, Course Level and Previous Language Learning Experience on Japanese Language Achievement, Foreign Language Annals, 26(3) 359–371.
OXFORD, R.L. & SHEARIN, J. (1994): Language learning motivation : Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal 781: 12–28.
RlGNEY, J.W. (1978) : Learning strategies : A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Learning Strategies, pp. 165–205. New York : Academic Press.
RUBIN, J. & THOMPSON, I. (1994) : How to be a More Successful Language Learner, 2nd, Edition. Boston : Heinle & Heinle.
SCHUMANN, J. (1978) : The acculturation model for second language acquisition, In Gingras (Ed.) Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, pp.27–50. Arlington, VA : Center for Applied Linguistics.
UNGER, J.M., LORISH, F.C., NODA, M., & WADA, Y.(1993) : A Framework for Introductory Japanese Language Curricula in American High Schools and Colleges. Washington, DC : National Foreign Language Center.
USUKI, M. (1997) : Fostering learner awareness on autonomy : A case of learner training. Language Teacher 21(10):41–49.
