Article published In: ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 115/116 (1997) ► pp.1–26
L2 Processing of Dutch regular and irregular Verbs
Vincent J. van Heuven | Department of Linguistics/Phonetics Laboratory | Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics (HIL) Leiden University
Published online: 1 January 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.115-116.01lal
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.115-116.01lal
Abstract
Do Ll and (advanced) L2 speakers of Dutch employ distinct processes — rule application for regulars and lexical lookup for irregulars — when producing Dutch past tense forms? Do L2 speakers of a language that observes the same dual conjugation system as in Dutch (e.g. English, German) produce Dutch past tenses by a different process (i.e. more like that of Ll speakers) than learners of Dutch with a different Ll verb system (e.g. Japanese and Chinese)? We studied the on-line past tense production performance of Ll speakers and of advanced L2 speakers of Dutch varying relative past tense frequency of regular and irreg-ular Dutch verbs. Performance proved slower and less accurate with both Ll and L2 speakers for irregular verbs with relatively low past tense frequency. No frequency effects were found for regular verbs. The results were qualitatively the same for English/German and for Japanese/Chinese L2 speakers, with a striking tendency to overgeneralize the regular past tense formation. We conclude that the mental representation of the Dutch past tense rule is essentially the same for Ll and L2 language users.
References (11)
BYBEE, J.L. (1988). 'Morphology as lexical organization', in M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical MOrophology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 119–141.
BYBEE, J., & SLOBIN, D. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 581, 265–289.
EUBANK, L., & BECK, M. (1992). 'Is L2 Knowledge Rule-Governed?' Paper presented At The Deck Symposium on Congnition and Second Language Acquisition, University of Oregon, February 26-27,1992.
EXTRA, G. (1978). Eerste- en tweede-taalverwerving [First and second language acquisition], Muiderberg : Coutinho.
GEERTS, G., HAESERYN, W., ROOIJ, J. DE, & TOORN, M.C. VAN DEN (1984). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst [Reference grammar of Dutch], Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
LALLEMAN, J., & SANTEN, A. VAN (1994). De produktie van Nederlandse regel-matige en onregelmatige verledentijdsvormen door moedertaalsprekers en tweede-taalverwervers [The production of Dutch regular and irregular past tense forms by native speakers and second language learners]. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 46/471, 173–184.
PINKER, S., & PRINCE, A. (1992). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In Proceedings of the 1991 Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
PRASADA, S., PINKER, S., & SNYDER, W. (1990). 'Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-generated'. Poster presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
RUMELHART, D.E. & MCCLELLAND, J.L. (1986). 'On learning the past tenses of English verbs'. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol 2. Psychological and biological modes. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press, 216–271.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.