Article published In: Approaches to learning, testing, and researching L2 vocabulary
Edited by Stuart Webb
[ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169:1] 2018
► pp. 212–231
Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages
An approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009)
Published online: 16 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00013.nor
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00013.nor
Abstract
The present study aims to replicate Stæhr, L. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 577–607. study on the relationship between
vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. To explore the generalizability of Stæhr’s findings, two experiments were
conducted. However, the study changed the population (Flemish learners) and proficiency level of the materials in the first
experiment (intermediate) and also the language in the second experiment (French). Our results generally confirm Stæhr’s findings.
We also found a positive correlation between vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. Although our findings reveal that
learners probably need fewer words for adequate listening comprehension at an intermediate proficiency level, our study also
showed that learners who knew more words had higher listening comprehension scores. Finally, our study seems to suggest that
learners might need less lexical coverage for intermediate listening.
Article outline
- 1.Background
- 1.1The original study
- 1.2Importance of the problem
- 1.3Relevant scholarship
- 1.4Statement of purpose
- 2.Research questions
- 3.Experiment 1: English
- 3.1Method
- 3.1.1Participants
- 3.1.2Materials
- 3.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for English: Preliminary English Test for schools (PET)
- 3.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
- 3.1.3Procedure
- 3.1.4Scoring and analyses
- 3.2Results
- 3.2.1Descriptive statistics
- 3.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
- 3.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
- 3.1Method
- 4.Experiment 2: French
- 4.1Method
- 4.1.1Participants
- 4.1.2Materials
- 4.1.2.1Listening comprehension test for French: Diplôme d’études en langue française (DELF)
- 4.1.2.2Receptive vocabulary test
- 4.1.3Procedure
- 4.1.4Scoring and analyses
- 4.2Results
- 4.2.1Descriptive statistics
- 4.2.2To what extent is vocabulary knowledge associated with listening comprehension?
- 4.2.3How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
- 4.3The relationship between vocabulary and listening comprehension
- 4.4How much vocabulary is needed for adequate listening comprehension?
- 4.1Method
- 5.Limitations
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (21)
Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 425–438.
Bonk, W. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31.
Cobb, T. (n.d.) Compleat lexical tutor. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages; Learning, teaching, assessment.
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). English for specific purposes. The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 331, 66–76.
Davies, M. (2008). Corpus of Contemporary American English. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Elgort, I. (2013). Effects of L1 definitions and cognate status of test items on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 30(2), 253–272.
Laufer, B., & Levitzky-Aviad, T. (2018). Loanword proportion in vocabulary size tests: Does it make a difference? ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 94–113.
Laufer, B., & McLean, S. (2016). Loanwords and vocabulary size test scores: A case of different estimates for different L1 learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217.
Londsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y. (2009). A frequency dictionary of French core vocabulary for learners. Londen: Routledge.
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82.
Peters, E., Velghe, T., & Van Rompaey, T. (2015, May). A post-entry English and French vocabulary size for Flemish learners. Paper presented at EALTA. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Plonsky, L., & Derrick, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 538–553.
Porte, G. (2012). Introduction. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp.1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355–371.
Schmitt, N., Cobb, R., Horst, M. & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and
Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 181, 55–89.
Cited by (44)
Cited by 44 other publications
Majuddin, Elvenna, Frank Boers & Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
Bagheri, Morteza & Martin East
2025. Second language listening pedagogy. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 451 ff.
Cox, Ashleigh, Daniel Dixon & Tülay Dixon
Davaribina, Mehran & Elshan Varghaei
Jandhyala, Prabhakara Rao, Prakash Purshewar, Princy Pappachan, Imam Santosa & Harlinda Syofyan
Lindqvist, Christina
2025. Examining vocabulary knowledge in languages other than English. In Approaches and Methods in French Second Language Acquisition Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 9], ► pp. 95 ff.
Montero Perez, Maribel & Anastasia Pattemore
Van Parys, Amaury, Vanessa De Wilde, Lieve Macken & Maribel Montero Perez
Verbeke, Gil, Holger Mitterer & Ellen Simon
Abdullah Alharbi, Majed & Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal
Durbahn, Marion, Michael Rodgers, Marijana Macis & Elke Peters
Finlayson, Natalie, Emma Marsden & Rachel Hawkes
Suter, Lea, Raphael Berthele & Anita Thomas
Suter, Lea, Raphael Berthele & Anita Thomas
Aldukhayel, Dukhayel
Arndt, Rebeca
Fievez, Isabeau, Maribel Montero Perez, Frederik Cornillie & Piet Desmet
Finlayson, Natalie, Emma Marsden & Laurence Anthony
Giordano, Michael J.
Huynh Le, Nhu & Hung Tan Ha
Kremmel, Benjamin, Bimali Indrarathne, Judit Kormos & Shungo Suzuki
Peters, Elke, Eva Puimège & Paweł Szudarski
GÖKCAN, Mustafa & Derya ÇOBANOĞLU AKTAN
Reynolds, Barry Lee, Xiaowen (Serina) Xie & Quy Huynh Phu Pham
Ha, Hung Tan
Ha, Hung Tan
Ha, Hung Tan
Laufer, Batia, Stuart Webb, Su Kyung Kim & Beverley Yohanan
2021. How well do learners know derived words in a second language?. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 172:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Majuddin, Elvenna, Anna Siyanova-Chanturia & Frank Boers
Satori, Miki
Satori, Miki
Durbahn, Marion, Michael Rodgers & Elke Peters
Masrai, Ahmed
Noreillie, Ann-Sophie, Piet Desmet & Elke Peters
Peters, Elke
2020. The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners’ vocabulary knowledge. In Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary [Benjamins Current Topics, 109], ► pp. 143 ff.
Pujadas, Geòrgia & Carmen Muñoz
Uchihara, Takumi & Jon Clenton
Uchihara, Takumi & Jon Clenton
Peters, Elke, Ann‐Sophie Noreillie, Kris Heylen, Bram Bulté & Piet Desmet
Peters, Elke, Tom Velghe & Tinne Van Rompaey
Sakata, Naoki
Suárez, Maria del Mar & Ferran Gesa
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
