Article published In: Holophrasis vs Compositionality in the Emergence of Protolanguage
Edited by Michael A. Arbib and Derek Bickerton
[Interaction Studies 9:1] 2008
► pp. 100–116
Protolanguage reconstructed
Published online: 7 March 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.08smi
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.08smi
One important difference between existing accounts of protolanguage lies in their assumptions on the semantic complexity of protolinguistic utterances. I bring evidence about the nature of linguistic communication to bear on the plausibility of these assumptions, and show that communication is fundamentally inferential and characterised by semantic uncertainty. This not only allows individuals to maintain variation in linguistic representation, but also imposes a selection pressure that meanings be reconstructible from context. I argue that protolanguage utterances had varying degrees of semantic complexity, and developed into complex language gradually, through the same processes of re-analysis and analogy which still underpin continual change in modern languages.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Chaer, Hasanuddin, Ahmad Sirulhaq, Abdu Rasyad & Djamil Abdurachman Malik
Martens, Betsy Van der Veer
Pleyer, Michael & Stefan Hartmann
Zywiczynski, Przemyslaw, Nathalie Gontier & Slawomir Wacewicz
Silvey, Catriona
Smith, Andrew D. M.
Smith, Andrew D.M.
Gong, Tao, Lan Shuai & Bernard Comrie
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
