Article published In: Making Minds I
Edited by Petra Hauf and Friedrich Försterling
[Interaction Studies 6:1] 2005
► pp. 119–130
Attributions and peer harassment
Published online: 18 April 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.6.1.09gra
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.6.1.09gra
Attribution theory is used as a conceptual framework for examining how causal beliefs about peer harassment influence how victims think and feel about themselves. Evidence is presented that victims who make characterological self-blaming attributions (“it must be me”) are particularly at risk of negative self-views. Also examined is the influence of social context, particularly the ethnic composition of schools and classrooms. It was found that students who were both victims of harassment and members of the majority ethnic group were more vulnerable to self-blaming attributions. In contrast, greater ethnic diversity, that is, classrooms where no one group was in the majority, tended to ward off self-blaming tendencies. Studies of peer harassment are a good context for examining one of the main themes of the special issue, which is how the social context (e.g., peer groups, ethnic groups) influences the way individuals think and feel about themselves.
Keywords: ethnicity, peer victimization, attribution
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Gusfre, Kari Stamland, Janne Støen & Hildegunn Fandrem
Negi, Rekha
Palmer, Sally B., Kelly Lynn Mulvey & Adam Rutland
Bayram Özdemir, Sevgi, Metin Özdemir & Håkan Stattin
Mali, Luiza V., David Schwartz, Daryaneh Badaly, Tana J. Luo, Sarah Malamut, Alexandra C. Ross & Mylien T. Duong
Morrow, Michael T., Julie A. Hubbard & Marissa K. Sharp
Danielson, Carly M. & Tara M. Emmers-Sommer
D’hondt, Fanny, Mieke Van Houtte & Peter A. J. Stevens
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
