Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 25:3 (2024) ► pp.340–368
Impact of AI chatbots on EFL learners’ technology adoption
An extension of the UTAUT2 model
Published online: 27 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.24019.hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.24019.hua
Abstract
This study investigates the factors influencing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ adoption of AI
chatbots by extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) model. The research incorporates two
additional constructs, Core Self-Evaluation (CSE) and Learning Value (LV), to enhance the model’s predictive power in the context
of language learning technology.
A quantitative approach was employed, collecting data from 362 English-major undergraduates at a prominent
university, using structured survey questionnaires. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation
modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the relationships within the augmented UTAUT2 model.
The results reveal that performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, habit, CSE, and LV significantly
influence EFL learners’ behavioral intentions and actual use of AI chatbots. Effort expectancy, social influence, and hedonic
motivation were found to have no significant impact on adoption intentions. These findings underscore the importance of aligning
AI chatbot functionalities with learners’ educational goals and supporting their self-evaluative beliefs to promote technology
acceptance in language learning.
The study advances the UTAUT2 model by demonstrating the relevance of CSE and LV in predicting EFL learners’
adoption of AI chatbots. The findings offer insights for educators and developers to enhance chatbot design, meeting learners’
pedagogical needs and expectations.
Keywords: AI chatbots, UTAUT2, Core Self-Evaluation (CSE), EFL learner, Learning Value
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.1Integration of AI technology in EFL learning
- 2.2Application and integration of the UTAUT2 model in language learning
- 2.2.1Student attitudes and acceptance of AI chatbots
- 2.2.2Integration of CSE and learning value constructs
- 2.3Interaction authenticity and its role in EFL chatbot adoption
- 3.Model conceptualization and hypotheses development
- 3.1Performance expectancy (PE)
- 3.2Effort Expectancy (EE)
- 3.3Social Influence (SI)
- 3.4Facilitating Conditions (FC)
- 3.5Hedonic Motivation (HM)
- 3.6Habit (HT)
- 3.7Learning Value (LV)
- 3.8Core Self-Evaluation (CSE)
- 3.9Behavioral Intention (BI) and Use Behavior (USE)
- 4.Methods
- 4.1Participants and setting
- 4.2Research model
- 4.3Data collection and analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1Common method bias analysis
- 5.2Measurement model
- 5.3Structural model and hypotheses testing
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Findings
- 6.2Enhancing the pedagogical effectiveness of AI chatbots through learner acceptance and engagement
- 6.3Interaction authenticity, learning value, and intention to use
- 6.4Implications for educational practice and AI chatbot design
- 7.Limitations and future research directions
- 8.Conclusion
References
References (48)
Abdullah, F., and Ward, R. (2016). Developing
a general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external
factors. Computers in Human
Behavior, 561, 238–256.
Abusahyon, A., Alzyoud, A., Alshorman, O., & Al-Absi, B. (2023). AI-driven
Technology and Chatbots as Tools for Enhancing English Language Learning in the Context of Second Language Acquisition: A
Review Study. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology.
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Huamaní Jordan, O. et al. Analysis
of college students’ attitudes toward the use of ChatGPT in their academic activities: effect of intent to use, verification
of information and responsible use. BMC
Psychol 12, 255 (2024).
Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The
influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of
UTAUT2. Information
Development, 32(5), 1306–1321.
Akintayo, O. T., Eden, C. A., Ayeni, O. O., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Evaluating
the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic
review. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary
Studies.
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology
acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers &
Education, 1251, 389–412.
Alhalangy, A. G., & Abdalgane, M. (2023). Exploring
the Impact of AI on The EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Universities. Journal of
Intercultural Communication.
Belda-Medina, J., Kokošková, V. Integrating
chatbots in education: insights from the Chatbot-Human Interaction Satisfaction Model
(CHISM). Int J Educ Technol High
Educ 20, 62 (2023).
Bin-Hady, W. R., AL-KADI, A., Hazaea, A. N., & Ali, J. K. (2023). Exploring
the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: a global perspective. Library Hi
Tech.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer
Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing and
Research. Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Y. (2019). How
does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact? Education +
Training.
Das, S., & Datta, B. (2024). Application
of UTAUT2 on Adopting Artificial Intelligence Powered Lead Management System (AI-LMS) in passenger car
sales. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Dehghani, H., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Exploring
Iranian english as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT in english language teaching: Extending the technology
acceptance model. Education and Information
Technologies, 1–22.
Du, Y., & Gao, H. (2022). Determinants
affecting teachers’ adoption of AI-based applications in EFL context: An analysis of analytic hierarchy
process. Education and Information
Technologies, 271, 9357–9384.
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving
EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated
interactions. System.
Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M. S. (2024). Technology-enhanced
language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging
trends. Cogent
Education, 11(1).
Haynie, J., Flynn, C., & Mauldin, S. (2017). Proactive
personality, core self-evaluations, and engagement: the role of negative emotions. Management
Decision, 551, 450–463.
Hill, J., Ford, W. R., & Farreras, I. G. (2015). Real
conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human-human online conversations and human-chatbot
conversations. Comput. Hum.
Behav., 491, 245–250.
Huang, S., Hamdan, A. R., & Lin, B. (2024). Investigating
the Factors Influencing Chinese University EFL Learners’ Adoption of Mobile Technology-Integrated Vocabulary Learning Towards
Student-Centered Learning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Media
Development and Modernized Education, NMDME 2023, October 13–15,
2023, Xi’an, China.
Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining
students’ intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and
social-cognitive frameworks. Comput. Hum.
Behav., 721, 189–199.
Jameel, A., Karem, M., Aldulaimi, S., Muttar, A., & Ahmad, A. (2021). The
Acceptance of E-Learning Service in a Higher Education Context. Proceedings of International
Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems.
Jiang, R. (2022). How
does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL
context. Frontiers in Psychology, 131.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The
core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel
Psychology, 56(2), 303–331.
Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. (2008). Relationships
between the Perceived Value of Instructional Techniques and Academic Motivation. Journal of
Instructional
Psychology, 351, 70–82.
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M. & Machaidze, L. Role
of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. Int J Educ Technol High
Educ 201, 56 (2023).
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. (2007). How
Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems
Continuance. MIS
Q., 311, 705–737.
Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y. Q. & Lu, O. H. T. Artificial
intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart
Learn. Environ. 10, 41 (2023).
Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring
EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance
model. Innovation in Language Learning and
Teaching, 18(2), 125–138.
Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2024). Exploring
AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): a mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption
and experiences. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 1–29.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An
Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use
e-Learning. J. Educ. Technol.
Soc., 121, 150–162.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common
method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended
remedies. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K. F., & Tarhini, A. (2018). Factors
affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information
Technologies, 241, 509–530.
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S. S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The
impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online
learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 18(1).
Shikun, S., Grigoryan, G., Huichun, N., & Harutyunyan, H. (2024). AI
Chatbots: Developing English Language Proficiency in EFL Classroom. Arab World English Journal
(AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, April 2024: 292–305.
Teo, T. (2010). A
path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an
educational context. Interactive Learning
Environments, 181, 65–79.
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI
Chatbots in Chinese higher education: adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students — an integrated analysis
utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in
Psychology, 151.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davies, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User
acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS
Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer
acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of
technology. MIS
Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified
theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of
Association for Information
Systems, 17(5), 328–376.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Adoption
and Use of AI Tools: A Research Agenda Grounded in UTAUT (November 7, 2021).
Venkatesh, V. “Adoption
and Use of AI Tools: A Research Agenda Grounded in UTAUT,” Annals of Operations
Research, forthcoming. Available at SSRN: [URL]
Wang, X., Huang, R. “Tammy”, Sommer, M., Pei, B., Shidfar, P., Rehman, M. S., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Martin, F. (2024). The
Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Adaptive Learning Systems From 2010 to 2022 on Learner Outcomes: A
Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 0(0).
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers
and language learning: an overview. Language
Teaching, 31(2), 57–71.
Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are
We There Yet? — A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education. Frontiers in
Artificial Intelligence, 41.
Xiao, Y., Zhi, Y. An
Exploratory Study of EFL Learners’ Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks: Experience and
Perceptions. Languages. 2023; 8(3):212.
