Cover not available

Article published In: Interaction Studies
Vol. 25:2 (2024) ► pp.190–217

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Studying the detailed work of play using conversation analysis

Three case studies of pig interaction in industrial‑rearing settings

ORCiD logo with link | Radboud University
 | Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen | Maastricht University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Radboud University Nijmegen.

Published online: 7 February 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.22059.der
Abstract
This paper seeks to explore what happens when research methods predominantly reserved for the human animal are applied to study behavior of other animals. Specifically, we apply conversation analysis to investigate play fighting behavior of piglets in industrial-rearing conditions through three case studies. The analysis shows how play fighting is a mutually and continually (re-)established activity that relies on monitoring the other party’s continued willingness to engage. We show this orientation to continued willingness distinguishes the activity from more serious fighting. Maintaining mutual willingness is sequentially achieved through mutually constructed opening and closing sequences, floor yielding, and locally negotiating the rules for play. The head toss, a known play marker for pigs, was used flexibly by these piglets. These findings add to or reframe findings from behavioral studies of pig play. In conclusion, applying conversation analysis to pig interaction proves not only possible but fruitful as an additional approach to methods in the field of animal communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The conversation analytic approach
    • 1.2Conversation analysis and animal communication
    • 1.3Play behavior
    • 1.4Pig play behavior
    • 1.5Pig play fighting
  • 2.Data and method
    • 2.1Farms
    • 2.2Data collection and analysis
    • 2.3Transcriptions
    • 2.4Additional conventions current study
    • 2.5Ethics statement
  • 3.Analysis
    • Case study 1: Opening and closing the activity together
    • Case study 2: Role-reversals and (not) yielding the floor
    • Case study 3: Negotiating the rules of play
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Abrell, W. E., & Gruen, L. (2020). Ethics and Animal Ethnography Working Paper. [URL]
Bateson, G. (1955). A theory of play and fantasy. America Psychiatric Association Research Reports, 21, 39–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bekoff, M. (1974). Social play in coyotes, wolves, and dogs. Bioscience, 24(4), 225–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Play signals as punctuation: The structure of social play in canids. Behaviour, 132(5–6), 419–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Wild justice and fair play: Cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology and Philosophy, 191, 489–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bekoff, M., & Pierce, J. (2009). Wild justice: The moral lives of animals. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burghardt, G. M. (2005). The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byosiere, S.-E., Espinosa, J., & Smuts, B. (2016). Investigating the function of play bows in adult pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 1251, 106–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chalmers, N. R., & Locke-Haydon, J. (1981). Temporal patterns of play bouts in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Animal Behaviour, 29(4), 1229–1238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cordoni, G., Gioia, M., Demuru, E., & Norscia, I. (2021). The dark side of play: Play fighting as a substitute for real fighting in domestic pigs, Sus scrofa. Animal Behaviour, 1751, 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornips, L. (2022). The animal turn in postcolonial (socio) linguistics: the interspecies greeting of the dairy cow. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 61, 210–232. [URL]
Cornips, L., & van Koppen, M. (2024). Multimodal dairy cow–human interaction in an intensive farming context. Language Sciences, 1011, 101587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Malsche, F., & Cornips, L. (2021). Examining interspecies interactions in light of discourse analytic theory: A case study on the genre of human-goat communication at a petting farm. Language & Communication, 791, 53–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dierenbescherming (n.d.). Varkens. Retrieved February 2022 from: [URL]
Dobao, M. T., Rodrigañez, J., & Silio, L. (1985). Choice of companions in social play in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 13(3), 259–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Due, B. L. (2023). Interspecies intercorporeality and mediated haptic sociality: Distributing perception with a guide dog. Visual Studies, 38(1), 3–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enomoto, T. (1990). Social play and sexual behavior of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) with special reference to flexibility. Primates, 31(4), 469–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagen, R. M. (1981). Animal Play Behavior. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fröhlich, M., Kuchenbuch, P., Müller, G., Fruth, B., Furuichi, T., Wittig, R. M., & Pika, S. (2016). Unpeeling the layers of language: Bonobos and chimpanzees engage in cooperative turn-taking sequences. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 25887. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. In and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) — an announcement of studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genty, E., Heesen, R., Guéry, J.-P., Rossano, F., Zuberbühler, K., & Bangerter, A. (2020). How apes get into and out of joint actions: Shared intentionality as an interactional achievement. Interaction Studies, 21(3), 353–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. The Bobbs-Merrill Compan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1963). Behavior in public places; notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goode, D. (2007). Playing with my dog Katie: An ethnomethodological study of dog-human interaction. Purdue University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 222–244). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harjunpää, K. (2022). Repetition and prosodic matching in responding to pets’ vocalizations. Langage & Société, 176(2), 69–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heesen, R., Genty, E., Rossano, F., Zuberbühler, K., & Bangerter, A. (2017). Social play as joint action: A framework to study the evolution of shared intentionality as an interactional achievement. Learning & Behavior, 451, 390–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heesen, R., Fröhlich, M., Sievers, C., Woensdregt, M., & Dingemanse, M. (2022). Coordinating social action: A primer for the cross-species investigation of communicative repair. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1859), 20210110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Held, S. D. E., & Špinka, M. (2011). Animal play and animal welfare. Animal behaviour 811, 891–899. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horback, K. (2014). Nosing around: Play in pigs. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(2), 186–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, H. R. C., Bruce, J. M., English, P. R., Fowler, V. R., & Edwards, S. A. (2000). Behaviour of 3-week weaned pigs in Straw-Flow®, deep straw and flatdeck housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 68(4), 269–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurier, E., Maze, R., & Lundin, J. (2006). Putting the dog back in the park: Animal and human mind-in-action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 2–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logue, D. M., & Stivers, T. (2012). Squawk in interaction: A primer of conversation analysis for students of animal communication. Behaviour, 149(13–14), 1283–1298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maglieri, V., Zanoli, A., Mastrandrea, F., & Palagi, E. (2023). Don’t stop me now, I’m having such a good time! Czechoslovakian wolfdogs renovate the motivation to play with a bow. Current Zoology, 69(1), 50–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. (1991). Bateson’s concept of “metacommunication” in play. New Ideas in Psychology, 91, 73–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on language and social interaction, 51(1), 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L., & Meguerditchian, A. (2022). Sequence organization and embodied mutual orientations: Openings of social interactions between baboons. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1859), 20210101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondémé, C. (2011). Animal as Subject Matter for Social Sciences: When Linguistics Addresses the Issue of a Dog’s ‘Speakership. In Non-humans in social science: Animals, spaces, things (pp. 87–105). Pavel Mervart Červenỳ Kostelec.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). How do we talk to animals? Modes and pragmatic effects of communication with pets. Langage et societe, 163(1), 77–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). Why study turn-taking sequences in interspecies interactions? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 52(1), 67–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Interspecies Haptic Sociality: The Interactional Constitution of the Horse’s Esthesiologic Body in Equestrian Activities. Human Studies. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, E., Nordquist, R. E., & van der Staay, F. J. (2014). A review of behavioural methods to study emotion and mood in pigs, Sus scrofa. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1591, 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newberry, R. C., Wood-Gush, D. G. M., & Hall, J. W. (1988). Playful behaviour of piglets. Behavioural Processes, 17(3), 205–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palagi, E. (2008). Sharing the motivation to play: The use of signals in adult bonobos. Animal Behaviour, 75(3), 887–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palagi, E., & Pellis, S. (2022). Play Behaviour: A Comparative Perspective. In T. M. Freeberg, A. R. Ridley, P. d’Ettorre (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Comparative Psychology (1st ed., pp. 202–212). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellis, S. M., & Pellis, V. C. (2016). Play fighting in Visayan warty pigs (Sus cebifrons): Insights on restraint and reciprocity in the maintenance of play. Behaviour, 153(6–7), 727–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). What is play fighting and what is it good for? Learning & Behavior, 45(4), 355–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pika, S., Wilkinson, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Vernes, S. C. (2018). Taking turns: Bridging the gap between human and animal communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1880), 20180598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauw, W. M. (2013). A note on the consistency of a behavioral play marker in piglets. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 4(1), 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossano, F. (2013a). Gaze in Conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 308–329). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossano, F., & Liebal, K. (2014). ‘Requests’ and ‘offers’ in orangutans and human infants. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction (pp. 335–364). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (I-II). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sawyer, K. R. (1993). The pragmatics of play: Interactional strategies during children’s pretend play. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 3(3), 259–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. (1997). Play fighting and real fighting: Perspectives on their relationship. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer, & K. Schäfer (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welfare Quality®. (2009). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. [URL]
Wilkinson, R., Leudar, I., & Pika, S. (2012). Requesting behaviours within episodes of active sharing: A new look on chimpanzee signaling. In S. Pika & K. Liebal (Eds.), Developments in Primate Gesture Research (pp. 199–222). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cornips, Leonie, Ana Deumert & Alastair Pennycook
2024. Posthumanism and pragmatics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

video

Extract 1.1

Extract 1.2

Extract 1.3

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue