Article published In: Animal-Computer Interfaces: Novel Approaches for Studying Animal Behavior, Cognition and Communication
Edited by Irene M. Pepperberg
[Interaction Studies 24:2] 2023
► pp. 201–224
A biosemiotics perspective on dogs’ interaction with interfaces
An analytical and design framework
Published online: 3 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.22027.man
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.22027.man
Abstract
Understanding how animals might make sense of the interfaces they interact with is important to inform the design of animal-centered interactions. In this regard, biosemiotics provides a useful lens through which to examine animals’ interactions with interfaces and the sensemaking mechanisms that might underpin such interactions. This paper leverages Uexküll’s Umwelt theory, Peirce’s logic of sign relations and Gibson’s theory of affordances to analyze examples of dogs’ interactions with interfaces, particularly the role of the semiotic mechanisms of indexicality and isomorphism. Based on these analyses, the paper derives design implications, and proposes a semiotic framework to support the analysis and design of canine-centered interactions. The framework could be subsequently extended to support the analysis and design of interactive systems for other species.
Keywords: biosemiotics, dogs, animal-centered interactions, affordance, indexicality, isomorphism
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Influence of cognitive and behaviorist approaches on canine interaction design
- 3.A biosemiotics perspective on interaction
- 3.1The world from the organism’s perspective
- 3.2Signs as symbolic, iconic and indexical relations
- 4.The semiotics of affordance
- 4.1Gibson’s theory of affordances
- 4.2Affordance as a basis for substitution
- 4.3Affordance as a basis for dogs’ interpretation
- 5.The semiotics of dogs’ interaction with interfaces
- 5.1Case 1: Making sense of an affordance chain
- 5.2Case 2: Evolution of sensemaking from decoding to interpreting
- 5.3Case 3: Interpreting and translating interaction patterns
- 5.4Case 4: Semiotic consistency, sensemaking and experience
- 6.The semiotics of affordance in practice: implications for design
- 7.Concluding remarks
References
References (47)
(1998). The Organic Codes: the Basic Mechanisms of Macroevolution. Rivista di Biologia-Biology Forum, 91(3): 481–514.
Bhattacharjee, D., Mandal, S., Shit, P., Varghese, M. G., Vishnoi, A. and Bhadra, A. (2020). Free-Ranging Dogs Are Capable of Utilizing Complex Human Pointing Cues. Front. Psychol. 101:2818.
Byrne, C., Freil, L., Starnet, T., Jackson, M. M. (2016). A Method to Evaluate Haptic Interfaces for Working Dogs. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 981:196–207.
Eder, J., Rembold, H. (1992). Biosemiotics: A Paradigm of Biology: Biological Signalling on the Verge of Deterministic Chaos. Naturwissenschaften, 79(2): 60–67.
Freil, L., Byrne, C., Valentin, G., Zeagler, C., Roberts, D., Starner, T., Jackson, M. (2017). Canine-Centered Computing. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 10(2):1–82.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. CHI’91: Proc. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York: 79–84.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gombrich, E. H. (1963). Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art. The Alden Press, Oxford.
Hook, A. (2019). Exploring Speculative Methods: Building Artifacts to Investigate Interspecies Intersubjective Subjectivity. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 171: 146–164.
Jackson, M. M., Valentin, G., Freil, L., Burkeen, L., Zeagler, C., Gilliland, S., Currier, B., Starner, T. (2015). FIDO – Facilitating Interactions for Dogs with Occupations: Wearable Communication Interfaces for Working Dogs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(1):155–173.
Kohn, E. (2010). How Dogs Dream: Amazonian Natures and the Politics of Transspecies. American Ethnologist, 34 (1), pp. 3–24.
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Mancini, C., Hirsch-Matsioulas, O., Metcalfe, D. (2022). Politicising Animal-Computer Interaction: An Approach to Political Engagement with Animal-Centred Design. Proc. ACI’22, Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, ACM Digital Library, Art. 1, pp. 1–11.
Mancini, C., Lehtonen, J. (2018). The Emerging Nature of Participation in Multispecies Interaction Design. DIS’18: Proc. International Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM Press: 907–916.
Mancini, C., Lawson, S., Juhlin, O. (2016). Animal-Computer Interaction: the Emergence of a Discipline. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 981(Feb): 129–134.
Mancini, C., Li, S., O′Connor, G., Valencia, J., Edwards, D., McCain, H. (2016). Towards Multispecies Interaction Environments: Extending Accessibility to Canine Users. ACI’16: Proc. International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, ACM Press, New York.
Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Bryan, J., Stuart, A. (2012). Exploring Interspecies Sensemaking: Dog Tracking Semiotics and Multispecies Ethnography. UbiComp’12: Proc. International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM Press, New York, 143–152.
Metcalfe, D. (2015). Multispecies Design. PhD Thesis, University of Arts London and Falmouth University, UK.
Motamedi Fraser, M. (2019). Dog Words – or, How to Think without Language. The Sociological Review Monographs, 67(2): 374–390.
Norman, D., Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In User Centered System Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce, C. (1893–1910). Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs. From Buchler, J. Ed. (1955) The Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover. In Favareau, D. (2010). Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Springer.
Resner, B. I. (2001). Rover@Home: Computer Mediated Remote Interaction for Dogs. Media Arts and Sciences MS, Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Robinson, C., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Swanson, L., Marsden, H., Valencia, J., Aengenheister, B. (2015). Designing an Emergency Communication System for Human and Assistance Dog Partnerships. UbiComp’15: Proc. International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM Press: 337–347.
Robinson, C., Mancini, C., van der Linden, J., Guest, C., Harris, R. (2014). Canine-Centered Interface Design: Supporting the Work of Diabetes Alert Dogs. CHI’14: Proc. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press: 3757–3766.
Ruge, L., Mancini, C. (2019). Method for Evaluating Animal Usability (MEAU). ACI’19: Proc. International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, ACM DL, art. 141: 1–12.
Ruge, L., Cox, E., Mancini, C., Luck, R. (2018). User-Centered Design Approaches to Measuring Canine Behavior: Tail Wagging as a Measure of User Experience. ACI’18: Proc. Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, ACM DL, Art. 11: 1–12.
. ([1909] 1985). Umwelt and the Inner World of Animals. In Mellor, C. J., Gove, D., Burghardt, G. M. (Ed.) Foundations of Comparative Ethology. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold: 222–245.
Wallis, L. J., Range, F., Kubinyi, E., Chapagain, D., Serra, J., Huber, L. (2017). Utilising Dog-Computer Interactions to Provide Mental Stimulation in Dogs Especially During Ageing. Intl. Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction, Art.11:1–12.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Walkowiak, Piotr
Cunha, Jennifer, Corinne Renguette, Lily Stella & Clara Mancini
Kankaanpää, Vilma, Fay E Clark & Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas
Mancini, Clara, Daniel Metcalfe & Orit Hirsch-Matsioulas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
